Quantified propositional calculi and narrow implicit proofs

Pavel Pudlák; Neil Thapen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.10535

Quantified propositional calculi and narrow implicit proofs

Pavel Pudlák·Neil Thapen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the implicit version of a propositional proof system Q, we work with Q-proofs that are not written down directly, but are succinctly encoded by circuits. Thus implicit Q-proofs are potentially exponentially shorter than usual Q-proofs. We study narrow implicit proofs, a restricted version of this notion, in which lines in the encoded proof can only have polynomial size. We use a cut-elimination construction to show that G_{i+1} is equivalent to narrow implicit G_i, for i >= 1, where G_i is the extension of Frege allowing reasoning with Sigma^q_i quantified propositional formulas. We show that G_1 is equivalent to implicit resolution.

Explore related subjects

cs.LO cs.CC math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Pavel Pudlák, Neil Thapen. 2026-09-01. Quantified propositional calculi and narrow implicit proofs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10535

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.CC subject cs.LO subject math.LO subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Subgroup Accessibility in Group Order Logic

We investigate the expressive power of fixed-point logics (FP) and their extensions in defining generating sets for accessible subgroups of definable permutation groups. This operation, computable in polynomial time via the Schreier-Sims algorithm, plays a central role in the group-theoretic approach to Graph Isomorphism and Graph Canonisation. In particular, it underpins polynomial-time canonisation for bounded colour-class graphs--a class for which no natural logic capturing P is currently known. We first show that this operation cannot, in general, be expressed in any logic for P. This limitation arises from the fact that accessible subgroups need not admit symmetric generating sets of polynomial size. However, we prove that when the base group admits a definable ordered generating set, the accessible subgroup operation becomes definable in fixed-point logic with the group order operator (FP + ord). This is achieved by partially simulating the Schreier-Sims algorithm within FP + ord. As a corollary, we show that fixed-point logic with counting (FPC) can also define the operation when the base group is abelian. In particular, FPC can define the automorphism group of any graph with abelian colours--despite being unable to canonise such graphs.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Unconditional $V^0_1$-independence of a certified hitting-set principle

We show that a certified formalization of the hitting-set-existence axiom of Atserias and Tzameret, instantiated on the parity-based Nisan-Wigderson compression class of Khaniki, is independent of the two-sorted theory $V^0_1$ of $\mathrm{AC}^0$-reasoning, unconditionally: $V^0_1$ proves neither it nor its negation. The same holds for the corresponding certified dual weak pigeonhole principle, whose refutation is witnessed by a single seed that certified-computes every string of the model simultaneously. The mechanism is a bounded-arithmetic transfer of Atserias-Tzameret's reduction from hitting sets to the dual weak pigeonhole principle: the amplification half of that reduction, the sole source of its NP-oracle, is unnecessary at the native stretch of the Nisan-Wigderson map, and the compression half becomes a $V^0_1$-provable implication once circuit evaluation is replaced by its certified $Σ^B_0$ unfolding. This is, to our knowledge, the first independence result for a derandomization-flavoured existence principle at the $\mathrm{AC}^0$-reasoning level, and it makes explicit the bridge between the Khaniki Nisan-Wigderson line and the Atserias-Tzameret reverse mathematics of hitting sets.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Constructive solvability and the P versus NP problem

The relation between the computational complexity class NP and other complexity classes is addressed in the context of provability and limitations on the possibility of finding sound axioms for formal theories. We construct a family D of decision problems and show that under a certain finiteness condition, D contains a problem which is in NP. Further, it is shown that if the term ``constructible theory'' is defined in a way satisfying a specific natural condition, then no constructible and sound theory verifies a solution algorithm for any of the problems in D. Arguably, this solves the P versus NP problem under a constructive interpretation. The relation to classical proofs of NP $\subseteq$ EXPTIME is discussed. These proofs tacitly use an assumption which may fail for problems in D.

cs.CC↗