arXiv · 2604.25762
Euclid preparation. Testing template-fitting models for the multipoles of the two-point clustering of galaxy clusters
Abstract
The Euclid satellite will deliver a catalogue of optically selected galaxy clusters spanning from around 2000 deg$^2$ in Data Release (DR) 1 to around $14\,000$ deg$^2$ in DR3. In this work, we assess the validity of cluster clustering (CC) models for template-fitting, which complements the full-shape methodology by providing cosmological information from the anisotropy of the redshift-space two-point correlation function (2PCF). Both methods will be used to analyse the cluster 2PCF multipoles with Euclid. We examined the multipoles of the two-point redshift-space clustering of galaxy clusters simulated with the semi-analytic PINOCCHIO code using third-order Lagrangian perturbation theory, assuming a Euclid DR1-like footprint of 500 deg$^2$ in the northern hemisphere and 1400 deg$^2$ in the southern hemisphere. We estimated the first three even multipoles of the 2PCF and associated covariance matrix from 1000 DR1-like synthetic catalogues. We studied the impact of modelling the relevant non-linearities, halo bias, and photometric redshift uncertainties on the 2PCF. We applied three clustering models to the mock catalogues at 0 10^{14}\;h^{-1}\,M_\odot$ under realistic and optimistic photometric redshift uncertainty scenarios. We formulated a set of permissive and conservative criteria that ought to be fulfilled by the multipole cut-off scales and validated them against 100 mock catalogues via an inference of the growth rate multiplied by the matter power spectrum normalisation parameter, $f\sigma_8$. We tested the dispersion, Scoccimarro, and Taruya-Nishimichi-Saito models. We find that the dispersion model yields unbiased inferences on $f\sigma_8$ from CC down to 10 $h^{-1}$ Mpc in a DR1-like setting. All clustering models provide similar goodness-of-fit metrics in the presence of DR1-like cluster redshift uncertainties.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Euclid Collaboration, E. Tsaprazi, A. Fumagalli, F. Marulli, A. Heavens, G. F. Lesci, M. Romanello, M. Bolzonella, Z. Sakr, B. Altieri, S. Andreon, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, P. Battaglia, A. Biviano, E. Branchini, M. Brescia, S. Camera, V. Capobianco, C. Carbone, V. F. Cardone, J. Carretero, M. Castellano, G. Castignani, S. Cavuoti, K. C. Chambers, A. Cimatti, C. Colodro-Conde, G. Congedo, L. Conversi, Y. Copin, F. Courbin, H. M. Courtois, H. Degaudenzi, S. de la Torre, G. De Lucia, H. Dole, F. Dubath, X. Dupac, S. Dusini, S. Escoffier, M. Farina, R. Farinelli, S. Farrens, S. Ferriol, F. Finelli, P. Fosalba, S. Fotopoulou, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, M. Fumana, S. Galeotta, K. George, B. Gillis, C. Giocoli, J. Gracia-Carpio, A. Grazian, F. Grupp, S. V. H. Haugan, W. Holmes, F. Hormuth, A. Hornstrup, K. Jahnke, M. Jhabvala, B. Joachimi, S. Kermiche, A. Kiessling, B. Kubik, M. Kümmel, M. Kunz, H. Kurki-Suonio, A. M. C. Le Brun, S. Ligori, P. B. Lilje, V. Lindholm, I. Lloro, G. Mainetti, O. Mansutti, O. Marggraf, M. Martinelli, N. Martinet, R. J. Massey, S. Maurogordato, E. Medinaceli, S. Mei, M. Meneghetti, E. Merlin, G. Meylan, A. Mora, M. Moresco, L. Moscardini, E. Munari, C. Neissner, S. -M. Niemi, J. W. Nightingale, C. Padilla, S. Paltani, F. Pasian, K. Pedersen. 2026-04-28. Euclid preparation. Testing template-fitting models for the multipoles of the two-point clustering of galaxy clusters. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202660667
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.