arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2604.22578

Weak action representability of 2-nilpotent groups

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the representability of actions of the category $\mathsf{Nil}_2(\mathsf{Grp})$ of $2$-nilpotent groups. We first provide an algebraic characterisation of derived actions in $\mathsf{Nil}_2(\mathsf{Grp})$ by determining a universal strict general actor of an object $X$, which turns out to be the group $\operatorname{Aut}_c(X)$ of central automorphisms of $X$. We also characterise the morphisms $B \to \operatorname{Aut}_c(X)$ that define an action of $B$ on $X$ in $\mathsf{Nil}_2(\mathsf{Grp})$. We then show that $\mathsf{Nil}_2(\mathsf{Grp})$ is not action representable, and that the existence of a weak representation is related to the amalgamation property. Using the construction of an amalgam of a suitable family of abelian subgroups of $\operatorname{Aut}_c(X)$, we prove that the category $\mathsf{Nil}_2(\mathsf{Grp})$ is weakly action representable, and that a weak representing object can be chosen to be an abelian group. Finally, we show that $\mathsf{Nil}_2(\mathsf{Grp})$ is not locally algebraically cartesian closed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro Dioguardi Burgio, Manuel Mancini, Tim Van der Linden. 2026-04-24. Weak action representability of 2-nilpotent groups. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22578

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures

Let $(\mathscr{C},\mathbb{E},\mathfrak{s})$ be a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. We generalize Cole's Theorem to construct a mixed admissible model structure $\mathcal{M}_m$ from two compatible admissible model structures relative to proper classes $ξ_1\subseteqξ_2$ of $\mathscr{C}$. We then explicitly characterize the cofibrant objects of $\mathcal{M}_m$. Finally, we apply these results to exact and triangulated categories, recovering and extending recent work on mixed model structures.

math.CT

Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories

For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagger categories and cofree dagger categories via internal dagger category structure. To characterize cofree dagger categories, we use rectangular bands and show that a dagger category is cofree if and only if it is enriched over rectangular bands. For free dagger categories, we define the notion of a zigzag dagger category, and then show that a dagger category is free if and only if it is a zigzag dagger category. We also show that free dagger categories can be characterized as the coalgebras of the induced comonad from the free dagger category adjunction, and similarly that cofree free dagger categories can be characterized as the algebras of the induced monad from the cofree dagger category adjunction.

math.CT

A Counterexample to the Open Question on Object Ideals

We give a counterexample to completeness descent from ideal cotorsion pairs to their objects. A radical-square-zero algebra on the two-cycle gives a finite-dimensional example. The construction is intrinsically non-weakly-idempotent-complete.

math.CT