Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures

Junpeng Ren; Xianhui Fu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.15653

Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures

Junpeng Ren·Xianhui Fu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Let $(\mathscr{C},\mathbb{E},\mathfrak{s})$ be a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. We generalize Cole's Theorem to construct a mixed admissible model structure $\mathcal{M}_m$ from two compatible admissible model structures relative to proper classes $ξ_1\subseteqξ_2$ of $\mathscr{C}$. We then explicitly characterize the cofibrant objects of $\mathcal{M}_m$. Finally, we apply these results to exact and triangulated categories, recovering and extending recent work on mixed model structures.

Explore related subjects

math.CT math.RA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Junpeng Ren, Xianhui Fu. 2026-09-14. Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15653

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories

For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagger categories and cofree dagger categories via internal dagger category structure. To characterize cofree dagger categories, we use rectangular bands and show that a dagger category is cofree if and only if it is enriched over rectangular bands. For free dagger categories, we define the notion of a zigzag dagger category, and then show that a dagger category is free if and only if it is a zigzag dagger category. We also show that free dagger categories can be characterized as the coalgebras of the induced comonad from the free dagger category adjunction, and similarly that cofree free dagger categories can be characterized as the algebras of the induced monad from the cofree dagger category adjunction.

math.CT↗

arXiv2026

A Counterexample to the Open Question on Object Ideals

We give a counterexample to completeness descent from ideal cotorsion pairs to their objects. A radical-square-zero algebra on the two-cycle gives a finite-dimensional example. The construction is intrinsically non-weakly-idempotent-complete.

math.CT↗

arXiv2026

Grothendieck Topologies Are Extensional Presentations of the Form of Sieves

A Grothendieck topology on a category determines both a subform of covering sieves and a quotient form obtained by identifying locally equivalent sieves. We place these two constructions in a single short exact sequence. For this purpose we introduce distributivity forms: indexed meet-semilattices equipped with distinguished indexed joins over which finite indexed meets distribute, and a strong version in which these joins also satisfy Beck--Chevalley. Over a fixed base, the resulting categories have all small limits and have kernels and cokernels relative to the closed ideal of fibrewise constant-top morphisms. Their monomorphisms are the fibrewise injective morphisms, and their relative cokernels, together with the top-reflecting morphisms, form an orthogonal factorization system. Cokernels compose but need not be stable under pullback, whereas kernels need not compose. We call a short exact sequence with prescribed middle term an extensional presentation, and prove that Grothendieck topologies on a category are precisely the extensional presentations of its maximally distributive form of sieves. Further applications recover universal productive closure operators and Lawvere--Tierney topologies, functorial non-Archimedean group topologies, and functorial linear topologies on commutative rings.

math.CT↗