arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2502.12439

Gorenstein categories relative to G-admissible triples

Abstract

We present the notion of Gorenstein categories relative to G-admissible triples. This is a relativization of the concept of Gorenstein category (an abelian category with enough projective and injective objects, in which the suprema of the sets $\{ {\rm pd}(I) \ \text{:} \ I \text{ is injective} \}$ and $\{ {\rm id}(P) \ \text{:} \ P \text{ is projective} \}$ are finite). Such categories turn out to be a suitable setting on which it is possible to obtain hereditary abelian model structures where the (co)fibrant objects are Gorenstein injective (resp., Gorenstein projective) objects relative to GI-admissible (resp., GP-admissible) pairs. Applications and examples of these structures are given. Moreover, we link relative Gorenstein categories with tilting theory and obtain relations between different relative homological dimensions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sergio Estrada, Octavio Mendoza, Marco A. Pérez. 2025-02-18. Gorenstein categories relative to G-admissible triples. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures

Let $(\mathscr{C},\mathbb{E},\mathfrak{s})$ be a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. We generalize Cole's Theorem to construct a mixed admissible model structure $\mathcal{M}_m$ from two compatible admissible model structures relative to proper classes $ξ_1\subseteqξ_2$ of $\mathscr{C}$. We then explicitly characterize the cofibrant objects of $\mathcal{M}_m$. Finally, we apply these results to exact and triangulated categories, recovering and extending recent work on mixed model structures.

math.CT

Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories

For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagger categories and cofree dagger categories via internal dagger category structure. To characterize cofree dagger categories, we use rectangular bands and show that a dagger category is cofree if and only if it is enriched over rectangular bands. For free dagger categories, we define the notion of a zigzag dagger category, and then show that a dagger category is free if and only if it is a zigzag dagger category. We also show that free dagger categories can be characterized as the coalgebras of the induced comonad from the free dagger category adjunction, and similarly that cofree free dagger categories can be characterized as the algebras of the induced monad from the cofree dagger category adjunction.

math.CT

A Counterexample to the Open Question on Object Ideals

We give a counterexample to completeness descent from ideal cotorsion pairs to their objects. A radical-square-zero algebra on the two-cycle gives a finite-dimensional example. The construction is intrinsically non-weakly-idempotent-complete.

math.CT