arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.16584

The need to implement FAIR principles in biomolecular simulations

Rommie Amaro·Johan Åqvist·Ivet Bahar·Federica Battistini·Adam Bellaiche·Daniel Beltran·Philip C. Biggin·Massimiliano Bonomi·Gregory R. Bowman·Richard Bryce·Giovanni Bussi·Paolo Carloni·David Case·Andrea Cavalli·Chie-En A. Chang·Thomas E. Cheatham III·Margaret S. Cheung·Cris Chipot·Lillian T. Chong·Preeti Choudhary·Gerardo Andres Cisneros·Cecilia Clementi·Rosana Collepardo-Guevara·Peter Coveney·Roberto Covino·T. Daniel Crawford·Matteo Dal Peraro·Bert de Groot·Lucie Delemotte·Marco De Vivo·Jonathan Essex·Franca Fraternali·Jiali Gao·Josep Lluís Gelpí·Francesco Luigi Gervasio·Fernando Danilo Gonzalez-Nilo·Helmut Grubmüller·Marina Guenza·Horacio V. Guzman·Sarah Harris·Teresa Head-Gordon·Rigoberto Hernandez·Adam Hospital·Niu Huang·Xuhui Huang·Gerhard Hummer·Javier Iglesias-Fernández·Jan H. Jensen·Shantenu Jha·Wanting Jiao·William L. Jorgensen·Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin·Syma Khalid·Charles Laughton·Michael Levitt·Vittorio Limongelli·Erik Lindahl·Kresten Lindorff-Larsen·Sharon Loverde·Magnus Lundborg·Yun Lyna Luo·Francisco Javier Luque·Charlotte I. Lynch·Alexander MacKerell·Alessandra Magistrato·Siewert J. Marrink·Hugh Martin·J. Andrew McCammon·Kenneth Merz·Vicent Moliner·Adrian Mulholland·Sohail Murad·Athi N. Naganathan·Shikha Nangia·Frank Noe·Agnes Noy·Julianna Oláh·Megan O'Mara·Mary Jo Ondrechen·José N. Onuchic·Alexey Onufriev·Silvia Osuna·Anna R. Panchenko·Sergio Pantano·Carol Parish·Michele Parrinello·Alberto Perez·Tomas Perez-Acle·Juan R. Perilla·B. Montgomery Pettitt·Adriana Pietropalo·Jean-Philip Piquemal·Adolfo Poma·Matej Praprotnik·Maria J. Ramos·Pengyu Ren·Nathalie Reuter·Adrian Roitberg·Edina Rosta·Carme Rovira
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This letter illustrates the opinion of the molecular dynamics (MD) community on the need to adopt a new FAIR paradigm for the use of molecular simulations. It highlights the necessity of a collaborative effort to create, establish, and sustain a database that allows findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability of molecular dynamics simulation data. Such a development would democratize the field and significantly improve the impact of MD simulations on life science research. This will transform our working paradigm, pushing the field to a new frontier. We invite you to support our initiative at the MDDB community (https://mddbr.eu/community/) Now published as: Amaro, R.E., et al. The need to implement FAIR principles in biomolecular simulations. Nat Methods (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02635-0

Explore related subjects

q-bio.BM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rommie Amaro, Johan Åqvist, Ivet Bahar, Federica Battistini, Adam Bellaiche, Daniel Beltran, Philip C. Biggin, Massimiliano Bonomi, Gregory R. Bowman, Richard Bryce, Giovanni Bussi, Paolo Carloni, David Case, Andrea Cavalli, Chie-En A. Chang, Thomas E. Cheatham III, Margaret S. Cheung, Cris Chipot, Lillian T. Chong, Preeti Choudhary, Gerardo Andres Cisneros, Cecilia Clementi, Rosana Collepardo-Guevara, Peter Coveney, Roberto Covino, T. Daniel Crawford, Matteo Dal Peraro, Bert de Groot, Lucie Delemotte, Marco De Vivo, Jonathan Essex, Franca Fraternali, Jiali Gao, Josep Lluís Gelpí, Francesco Luigi Gervasio, Fernando Danilo Gonzalez-Nilo, Helmut Grubmüller, Marina Guenza, Horacio V. Guzman, Sarah Harris, Teresa Head-Gordon, Rigoberto Hernandez, Adam Hospital, Niu Huang, Xuhui Huang, Gerhard Hummer, Javier Iglesias-Fernández, Jan H. Jensen, Shantenu Jha, Wanting Jiao, William L. Jorgensen, Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin, Syma Khalid, Charles Laughton, Michael Levitt, Vittorio Limongelli, Erik Lindahl, Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Sharon Loverde, Magnus Lundborg, Yun Lyna Luo, Francisco Javier Luque, Charlotte I. Lynch, Alexander MacKerell, Alessandra Magistrato, Siewert J. Marrink, Hugh Martin, J. Andrew McCammon, Kenneth Merz, Vicent Moliner, Adrian Mulholland, Sohail Murad, Athi N. Naganathan, Shikha Nangia, Frank Noe, Agnes Noy, Julianna Oláh, Megan O'Mara, Mary Jo Ondrechen, José N. Onuchic, Alexey Onufriev, Silvia Osuna, Anna R. Panchenko, Sergio Pantano, Carol Parish, Michele Parrinello, Alberto Perez, Tomas Perez-Acle, Juan R. Perilla, B. Montgomery Pettitt, Adriana Pietropalo, Jean-Philip Piquemal, Adolfo Poma, Matej Praprotnik, Maria J. Ramos, Pengyu Ren, Nathalie Reuter, Adrian Roitberg, Edina Rosta, Carme Rovira. 2025-04-03. The need to implement FAIR principles in biomolecular simulations. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02635-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SaltyMeta: a curated benchmark and protein language model-informed web tool for salty peptide prediction

Excess sodium intake remains a major public health challenge, while salty and saltiness-enhancing peptides offer a potential route to preserve sensory saltiness in reduced-sodium foods. Machine-learning studies of salty peptides, however, are constrained by small datasets, heterogeneous evidence standards, uncertain negative labels, and sequence similarity leakage. Here we present SaltyMeta, a curated benchmark and web-accessible screening framework for salty or saltiness-enhancing short peptides. The benchmark contains 580 peptides, including 280 positive peptides and 300 negative peptides, all standardized to 2-15 residue one-letter amino-acid sequences. Quality control found no non-standard residues, exact duplicates, or positive-negative overlaps. A similarity-grouped split retained 456 peptides for training and 124 for held-out testing. We evaluated 548 interpretable peptide descriptors, frozen ESM2 embeddings at 8M, 35M, and 150M parameter scales, and descriptor-embedding fusion models under grouped cross-validation. The traditional ExtraTrees baseline selected by training-set grouped cross-validation achieved ROC-AUC=0.693 in cross-validation and ROC-AUC=0.704, PR-AUC=0.702, F1=0.626, and MCC=0.304 on the held-out test set. The best initial protein-language-model fusion was traditional descriptors plus ESM2-8M embeddings, with grouped CV ROC-AUC=0.696 and test ROC-AUC=0.700. Advanced optimization using PCA95 dimensionality reduction and ExtraTrees feature-importance filtering yielded a practical ESM2-8M PCA95 top-300 model with test ROC-AUC=0.715 and PR-AUC=0.703, although repeated-CV gains remained modest. SaltyMeta is a transparent prioritization tool, not a sensory validation substitute. We provide benchmark, models, scripts, GitHub, and Streamlit for reproducible screening of food-derived peptides.

q-bio.BM↗
arXiv2026

Synthesizing State-of-the-Art Structure Predictions from Soup of Co-folding Models

Co-folding models have advanced rapidly, yet no single model consistently performs best across all biomolecular complexes. This raises the question of whether independently trained co-folding models encode complementary information that can be transferred across co-folding models. We introduce SoupFold, which improves co-folding predictions by learning simple mappings between the representation spaces of co-folding models. At inference time, SoupFold transfers and incorporates representations from other co-folding models to update the representation used for structure prediction. Importantly, this does not re-train the co-folding models. We evaluate SoupFold on protein-protein and protein-ligand prediction tasks of FoldBench using AlphaFold3, Protenix, ESMFold2, and OpenDDE. By combining their representations, SoupFold achieves state-of-the-art performance on both protein-protein and protein-ligand structure prediction, showing that independently trained co-folding models encode complementary information that can be effectively transferred across models.

q-bio.BM↗
arXiv2026

Exploring Optimal Parameters for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening in Early Drug Discovery

Ligand-based virtual screening depends on choices that are often treated as implementation details, including the similarity threshold, fingerprint setting and atom-invariant scheme. We examined how these choices altered the composition of ranked searches against the Enamine library for four aminergic reference ligands: atomoxetine, bupropion, mirtazapine and venlafaxine. Candidate sets were evaluated by compound-weighted scaffold novelty, normalized Shannon scaffold diversity and three computational estimates of synthetic accessibility. We first identified ligand-specific operating points along cumulative Tanimoto-ranked searches. We then compared five extended-connectivity fingerprint settings at matched retrieval depths and compared ECFP4 with the feature-class analogue FCSFP4. Finally, 240 records, corresponding to 229 unique structures, were scored independently by three chemists who were blinded to the computational scores. No single Tanimoto cutoff described all four searches. ECFP8 provided the most stable pooled setting, although venlafaxine favored ECFP2. ECFP4 was the stronger primary fingerprint in pooled comparisons, whereas FCSFP4 contributed nonredundant chemical space. Agreement among individual chemists was moderate, and the mean rating was more reliable than a single rating. SCScore showed the highest association with the blinded consensus, but performance varied by ligand. These results support a staged screening design in which a pooled default is followed by ligand-specific calibration and expert review.

q-bio.BM↗