arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2407.04706

Minimization of Nonlinear Energies in Python Using FEM and Automatic Differentiation Tools

Michal Béreš·Jan Valdman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This contribution examines the capabilities of the Python ecosystem to solve nonlinear energy minimization problems, with a particular focus on transitioning from traditional MATLAB methods to Python's advanced computational tools, such as automatic differentiation. We demonstrate Python's streamlined approach to minimizing nonlinear energies by analyzing three problem benchmarks - the p-Laplacian, the Ginzburg-Landau model, and the Neo-Hookean hyperelasticity. This approach merely requires the provision of the energy functional itself, making it a simple and efficient way to solve this category of problems. The results show that the implementation is about ten times faster than the MATLAB implementation for large-scale problems. Our findings highlight Python's efficiency and ease of use in scientific computing, establishing it as a preferable choice for implementing sophisticated mathematical models and accelerating the development of numerical simulations.

Explore related subjects

cs.MS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michal Béreš, Jan Valdman. 2024-05-03. Minimization of Nonlinear Energies in Python Using FEM and Automatic Differentiation Tools. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04706

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Eigensolvers for polynomial roots and tensor decomposition

Computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors is at the heart of the solution of many non-linear problems. For instance, finding the roots of polynomial systems reduces to computing joint eigenvectors of operators of multiplication. Similarly, tensor decomposition can be performed via the joint diagonalization of submatrices of the Catalecticant of the tensor. We describe and illustrate symbolic-numeric methods for computing the solutions of these algebraic problems from the computation of joint eigenvectors of commuting operators, and for analysing their multiplicity structure, as well as their implementation in the package AlgebraicSolvers.jl.

cs.MS↗
arXiv2026

The Art of Closed-Formula Defaults: Search-Free Code Generation for Tensor Operators

Agentic search and automated optimization of GPU kernels are powerful tools for large language model inference. Their effectiveness, however, depends not on the sophistication of the search itself, but on the clarity of the optimization problem being solved. We provide an application-first approach that drives a hierarchical code generation tool from operator specifi cation down to GPU instructions, and show that a clearly defined computational model makes the optimization problem tractable.

cs.MS↗
arXiv2026

FP8 is All You Need (Part 2): Full-FP64 3-D FFT on FP8-Generation Tensor CoresThe Integer-Epilogue Wall and the Minimal Hardware That Would Remove It

The NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra (B300) GPU cuts FP64 vector throughput $\sim 30\times$ while multiplying FP8 tensor throughput. After the recovery of FP64 GEMM via Ozaki Scheme II on FP8 tensor cores and the Tensor-Memory Equilibrium model of the companions ("FP8 is All You Need, Part 1" and "Ozaki 2.5") we ask whether the fifth canonical HPC primitive, the full-FP64 $1024^3$ 3-D FFT, can be carried by the same substrate, and answer with a design and its limit. It is a Bailey six-step transform with no FP64 arithmetic: FP8-tensor DFT GEMMs with fused twiddles, residue-domain Karatsuba combines and exact CRT reconstruction whose bulk is a small GEMM on the FP16 tensor path and whose remainder is a Kulisch fixed-point accumulation with a two-sided modulo-$M$ lift, so the only rounding is the final conversion; constants are machine-generated and verified bit-exactly. The central finding: the binding resource is not floating point but a per-output integer epilogue with floor $(c_{\rm epi}/8),B_{\rm mem}$, $c_{\rm epi} \approx 203$-$281$ instructions per output: on B300 it holds the transform at 63-87 ms against a 12.9 ms roof ($4.9$-$6.7\times$ short); at most $1.3$-$1.9\times$ faster than the collapsed native path, possibly no faster at realised issue rates; no software route reaches the roof; on the NVIDIA Rubin GPU emulation loses $8$-$11\times$. An FP32 variant meets the same wall: the cause is per-scalar reconstruction, not FP64. Each floor term names its remedy: the NVIDIA B200 GPU's INT8 tensor core restored with a position-weighted cross-column accumulation primitive, a load-path deconstruction datapath shared with the companions, two ISA idioms and modular reduction at the MMA output give 16.0-23.5 ms with minor hardware and 12.9-15.0 ms with one moderate ask. All figures are projected floors, not measurements, with sensitivities and the FP8 layout condition given.

cs.MS↗