arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2606.23698

FP8 is All You Need (Part 2): Full-FP64 3-D FFT on FP8-Generation Tensor CoresThe Integer-Epilogue Wall and the Minimal Hardware That Would Remove It

Satoshi Matsuoka
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The NVIDIA Blackwell Ultra (B300) GPU cuts FP64 vector throughput $\sim 30\times$ while multiplying FP8 tensor throughput. After the recovery of FP64 GEMM via Ozaki Scheme II on FP8 tensor cores and the Tensor-Memory Equilibrium model of the companions ("FP8 is All You Need, Part 1" and "Ozaki 2.5") we ask whether the fifth canonical HPC primitive, the full-FP64 $1024^3$ 3-D FFT, can be carried by the same substrate, and answer with a design and its limit. It is a Bailey six-step transform with no FP64 arithmetic: FP8-tensor DFT GEMMs with fused twiddles, residue-domain Karatsuba combines and exact CRT reconstruction whose bulk is a small GEMM on the FP16 tensor path and whose remainder is a Kulisch fixed-point accumulation with a two-sided modulo-$M$ lift, so the only rounding is the final conversion; constants are machine-generated and verified bit-exactly. The central finding: the binding resource is not floating point but a per-output integer epilogue with floor $(c_{\rm epi}/8),B_{\rm mem}$, $c_{\rm epi} \approx 203$-$281$ instructions per output: on B300 it holds the transform at 63-87 ms against a 12.9 ms roof ($4.9$-$6.7\times$ short); at most $1.3$-$1.9\times$ faster than the collapsed native path, possibly no faster at realised issue rates; no software route reaches the roof; on the NVIDIA Rubin GPU emulation loses $8$-$11\times$. An FP32 variant meets the same wall: the cause is per-scalar reconstruction, not FP64. Each floor term names its remedy: the NVIDIA B200 GPU's INT8 tensor core restored with a position-weighted cross-column accumulation primitive, a load-path deconstruction datapath shared with the companions, two ISA idioms and modular reduction at the MMA output give 16.0-23.5 ms with minor hardware and 12.9-15.0 ms with one moderate ask. All figures are projected floors, not measurements, with sensitivities and the FP8 layout condition given.

Explore related subjects

cs.MScs.AIcs.DCcs.PF

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Satoshi Matsuoka. 2026-05-28. FP8 is All You Need (Part 2): Full-FP64 3-D FFT on FP8-Generation Tensor CoresThe Integer-Epilogue Wall and the Minimal Hardware That Would Remove It. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23698

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.DC subjectcs.MS subjectcs.PF subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Art of Closed-Formula Defaults: Search-Free Code Generation for Tensor Operators

Agentic search and automated optimization of GPU kernels are powerful tools for large language model inference. Their effectiveness, however, depends not on the sophistication of the search itself, but on the clarity of the optimization problem being solved. We provide an application-first approach that drives a hierarchical code generation tool from operator specifi cation down to GPU instructions, and show that a clearly defined computational model makes the optimization problem tractable.

cs.MS↗
arXiv2026

Ozaki 2.5: Engineering the Deconstruction Path of fp64-Emulated Dense Matrix Multiplication on FP8 Tensor Cores

FP8 Ozaki II emulates FP64 matrix multiplication by tensor-core products over a CRT residue system; converting the operands into residue planes (the deconstruction term in the Tensor-Memory Equilibrium model of the companion paper "FP8 is All You Need, Part 1") costs integer-pipe and memory resources before tensor instructions issue. This paper engineers that path; every result is a model projection pending measurement. First, a deconstruction-aware model: on the NVIDIA Rubin GPU the emulated rate reaches the arithmetic roof $P_{\rm FP8}/(3r+1)$ ($\approx 473$ TFLOPS at $r=12$) only within one thread-block cluster; larger outputs are re-split on the fly and held at a floor of $\approx 235$ TFLOPS (half the roof, a ratio of three design integers, not a fit), while real solvers' tall/skinny shapes stay near the crossover, $1.6$-$1.9\times$ over simple deconstruction today. Second, the method: convert-once residue workspaces, an exact two-limb constant-reduction GEMM on integer tensor pipes (or pure-SIMT dp4a), and conversion pipelined behind the MMAs, moving the crossover from $\approx 1211$ to $\approx 480$-$730$. Third, modulus co-design: all-byte and hybrid sets, two supply bounds and a carry-corrected E4M3 split of tail moduli. Fourth and central, the closed-form floor names its hardware escape, and the prize is Rubin's: a stream-side residue-conversion mode on the asynchronous copy path (Option C), a narrow fixed-function block sized as a bill of materials, takes plane formation off the arithmetic pipes and lifts the floor from 235 TFLOPS to the full 473-TFLOPS roof at unchanged cluster reach, about doubling HPL-class FP64 per Rubin GPU, and unbinds conversion-bound sparse kernels. The NVIDIA GB300 GPU, whose 135-TFLOPS roof sits at its own floor, gains little; floor and remedy are Rubin-scale. Application traces ground the analysis; constants are script-checked.

cs.MS↗
arXiv2026

Geometric Function Atlas: certified computing for geometric function theory in Python

We describe geometric-function-atlas, our open-source Python package for the sharp extremal problems of geometric function theory. We organise it around a catalogue of thirty-nine Ma--Minda starlike generators. From this catalogue we compute exact Taylor coefficients, closed-form Fekete--Szeg\H{o} constants, exact coefficients of the Ma--Minda extremal function, and admissibility screens. Our verifier answers membership questions for normalised polynomials at three levels of evidence: a floating-point grid screen, an exact sufficient condition decided in rational arithmetic, and a certified interval enclosure at the worst screened point. Every answer names the level at which we obtained it. We ship a checksummed artifact snapshot with three hundred and six coefficient certificates and seven hundred and two directed inclusion radii. Eight reviewed radius lanes carry certificates whose proof chains we replay symbolically, and we re-execute every coefficient certificate through our exact Schur-parameter machinery on request. We emit all results through one versioned envelope that records the method, the evidence status, the assumptions, and the artifact identifiers. Two optional laboratories apply the same discipline to cryptographic S-box metrics and to image-quality metrics. We present our design, state as propositions what each tier establishes, follow one radius lane from screen to replayed certificate, report measured timings, and place our package among symbolic-algebra, rigorous-numerics, and mathematical-database software. We release geometric-function-atlas under the MIT licence on the Python Package Index and at https://github.com/Prasanna28Devadiga/geometric-function-atlas.

cs.MS↗