arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2404.17011

First-Fit Coloring of Forests in Random Arrival Model

Abstract

We consider a graph coloring algorithm that processes vertices in order taken uniformly at random and assigns colors to them using First-Fit strategy. We show that this algorithm uses, in expectation, at most $(1 + o(1))\cdot \ln n \,/\, \ln\ln n$ different colors to color any forest with $n$ vertices. We also construct a family of forests that shows that this bound is best possible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bartłomiej Bosek, Grzegorz Gutowski, Michał Lasoń, Jakub Przybyło. 2024-08-08. First-Fit Coloring of Forests in Random Arrival Model. https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.mfcs.2024.33

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Ramsey Obstructions to Disambiguation

A partial matrix has entries in $\{0,1,\star\}$, and a disambiguation replaces each $\star$ by $0$ or $1$. We construct partial matrices whose fully specified submatrices satisfy strong restrictions, yet every disambiguation contains every binary matrix of a prescribed size. Our first result answers a question of Alon, Hanneke, Holzman and Moran on the disambiguation of linear classifiers with margin. For $0<\varepsilon<π/2$, let $M_\varepsilon^d$ be the partial matrix indexed by points of the unit sphere $\mathbb S^d$, with entry $0$ for pairs at spherical distance at most $\varepsilon$, $1$ for pairs at distance at least $π-\varepsilon$, and $\star$ otherwise. Although these matrices have VC-dimension bounded independently of $d$, we prove that every disambiguation contains every binary $k\times k$ matrix once $d$ is sufficiently large. This also yields a partial concept class of Littlestone dimension $1$ with no disambiguation of finite VC-dimension. We also construct, for every $k$, a finite partial matrix whose fully specified $2\times2$ submatrices are all constant, while every disambiguation contains every binary $k\times k$ matrix. A symmetric analogue holds for partial graphs: for every $k$, there exists a partial graph of VC-dimension at most $1$ whose fully specified induced subgraphs are all cliques or stable sets, yet every disambiguation contains every $k$-vertex graph as an induced subgraph. A disambiguation can be viewed as a $2$-coloring of the unspecified entries, making Ramsey theory a natural framework for forcing prescribed patterns. Our proofs draw on two recent Ramsey theorems: the geometric argument uses Pálvölgyi's Dense Block theorem, while the combinatorial constructions rely on the girth Ramsey theorem of Reiher and Rödl, a suitable strengthening of the induced Ramsey theorem.

cs.DM

Oblivious Self-Distance Symmetric Rendezvous on the Integer Line

Symmetric rendezvous on the line is a search problem in which two agents, initially placed at distance $2d$, must follow the same randomized strategy to meet as quickly as possible. In the standard model, agents may condition their actions on the entire execution history, and both the known- and unknown-distance variants admit expected rendezvous time $Θ(d)$. We study the role of memory by introducing oblivious self-distance strategies, in which an agent's decision depends only on her position relative to her own starting location. For an initial separation of $2d$, let $R_d$ denote the optimal oblivious expected rendezvous time in the known-distance setting. We develop two finite-state frameworks based on absorbing Markov chains. Truncated chains give computable upper bounds through finite-support strategies, while weak-peek chains give lower bounds through a revealed-information relaxation. Together, they provide a mechanism for certifying optimality. Using that mechanism, we determine $R_1$ exactly and prove that it is attained by a finite-support strategy. For $d=2,\ldots,6$, numerical optimization gives the same truncation structure and objective values, yielding rigorous upper bounds below $7.83d^2$. We do not prove that the computed weak-peek minimizers are global, but the stability of the computations leads us to conjecture that they are, in which case the corresponding truncated strategies are optimal. We also prove that $R_d=Θ(d^2)$. In the unknown-distance setting, we construct a universal strategy, independent of $d$, with expected rendezvous time $O(d^{2+η})$ for every fixed $η>0$. Thus, under the memory restriction, the known-distance rendezvous time becomes quadratic, while near-quadratic performance remains possible even without knowing $d$. The asymptotic analysis uses birth-death Markov chains and their electrical-network interpretation.

cs.DM

Tournaments not inducible by five voters

A tournament T is k-inducible if there are k linear orders on its vertex set such that, for every arc $i \to j$ of T, a majority of the orders rank i above j. For odd k, let N(k) be the least order at which some tournament is not k-inducible. Only N(3) = 8 is known exactly; for N(5) the best bounds were $12 \le N(5) \le 38$, from our previous paper [2], which also gave the first explicit example of moderate order, the Paley tournament $P_{43}$. Results. A bespoke search algorithm improves both ends: $13 \le N(5) \le 23$. The upper bound comes from proving that $P_{23}$ is not 5-inducible, the case Bachmeier et al. [1] reported they could not decide, their SAT solver not having terminated within a cumulative six weeks; ours takes 22 hours on one laptop. The lower bound comes from an analysis at order 12. We also show that $P_{31}$ is not 5-inducible, while $P_{19}$ is 5-inducible but not with unit margin, that is, not by a profile in which every arc is carried by exactly three voters against two. Both $P_{19}$ and $P_{23}$ are arc-critical for their respective properties, whereas $P_{31}$ and $P_{43}$ are not vertex-critical: deleting a vertex leaves a tournament that is still not 5-inducible. Method. The search places one vertex at a time, always choosing the vertex with the fewest options left, and propagates the consequences. Together with the automorphisms of the tournament, this decides on a single laptop instances that neither integer programming nor a general-purpose SAT solver can settle. The refutations for $P_{19}$ and $P_{23}$ are certified as well: the search is split into independent subproblems, a SAT solver emits a machine-checkable proof for each, and a separate program rechecks every proof. All results, subject to two human-checked lemmas, are reproducible from https://github.com/Leonardini/TournamentsBeyond5Voters.

cs.DM