Predicting risk of delirium from ambient noise and light information in the ICU

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay; Ahna Cecil; Jessica Sena; Andrea Davidson; Ziyuan Guan; Subhash Nerella; Jiaqing Zhang; Kia Khezeli; Brooke Armfield; Azra Bihorac; Parisa Rashidi

arXiv · 2303.06253

Predicting risk of delirium from ambient noise and light information in the ICU

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay·Ahna Cecil·Jessica Sena·Andrea Davidson·Ziyuan Guan·Subhash Nerella·Jiaqing Zhang·Kia Khezeli·Brooke Armfield·Azra Bihorac·Parisa Rashidi

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Existing Intensive Care Unit (ICU) delirium prediction models do not consider environmental factors despite strong evidence of their influence on delirium. This study reports the first deep-learning based delirium prediction model for ICU patients using only ambient noise and light information. Ambient light and noise intensities were measured from ICU rooms of 102 patients from May 2021 to September 2022 using Thunderboard, ActiGraph sensors and an iPod with AudioTools application. These measurements were divided into daytime (0700 to 1859) and nighttime (1900 to 0659). Deep learning models were trained using this data to predict the incidence of delirium during ICU stay or within 4 days of discharge. Finally, outcome scores were analyzed to evaluate the importance and directionality of every feature. Daytime noise levels were significantly higher than nighttime noise levels. When using only noise features or a combination of noise and light features 1-D convolutional neural networks (CNN) achieved the strongest performance: AUC=0.77, 0.74; Sensitivity=0.60, 0.56; Specificity=0.74, 0.74; Precision=0.46, 0.40 respectively. Using only light features, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks performed best: AUC=0.80, Sensitivity=0.60, Specificity=0.77, Precision=0.37. Maximum nighttime and minimum daytime noise levels were the strongest positive and negative predictors of delirium respectively. Nighttime light level was a stronger predictor of delirium than daytime light level. Total influence of light features outweighed that of noise features on the second and fourth day of ICU stay. This study shows that ambient light and noise intensities are strong predictors of long-term delirium incidence in the ICU. It reveals that daytime and nighttime environmental factors might influence delirium differently and that the importance of light and noise levels vary over the course of an ICU stay.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay, Ahna Cecil, Jessica Sena, Andrea Davidson, Ziyuan Guan, Subhash Nerella, Jiaqing Zhang, Kia Khezeli, Brooke Armfield, Azra Bihorac, Parisa Rashidi. 2023-03-11. Predicting risk of delirium from ambient noise and light information in the ICU. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗