arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2203.14101

A Roadmap for Big Model

Sha Yuan·Hanyu Zhao·Shuai Zhao·Jiahong Leng·Yangxiao Liang·Xiaozhi Wang·Jifan Yu·Xin Lv·Zhou Shao·Jiaao He·Yankai Lin·Xu Han·Zhenghao Liu·Ning Ding·Yongming Rao·Yizhao Gao·Liang Zhang·Ming Ding·Cong Fang·Yisen Wang·Mingsheng Long·Jing Zhang·Yinpeng Dong·Tianyu Pang·Peng Cui·Lingxiao Huang·Zheng Liang·Huawei Shen·Hui Zhang·Quanshi Zhang·Qingxiu Dong·Zhixing Tan·Mingxuan Wang·Shuo Wang·Long Zhou·Haoran Li·Junwei Bao·Yingwei Pan·Weinan Zhang·Zhou Yu·Rui Yan·Chence Shi·Minghao Xu·Zuobai Zhang·Guoqiang Wang·Xiang Pan·Mengjie Li·Xiaoyu Chu·Zijun Yao·Fangwei Zhu·Shulin Cao·Weicheng Xue·Zixuan Ma·Zhengyan Zhang·Shengding Hu·Yujia Qin·Chaojun Xiao·Zheni Zeng·Ganqu Cui·Weize Chen·Weilin Zhao·Yuan Yao·Peng Li·Wenzhao Zheng·Wenliang Zhao·Ziyi Wang·Borui Zhang·Nanyi Fei·Anwen Hu·Zenan Ling·Haoyang Li·Boxi Cao·Xianpei Han·Weidong Zhan·Baobao Chang·Hao Sun·Jiawen Deng·Chujie Zheng·Juanzi Li·Lei Hou·Xigang Cao·Jidong Zhai·Zhiyuan Liu·Maosong Sun·Jiwen Lu·Zhiwu Lu·Qin Jin·Ruihua Song·Ji-Rong Wen·Zhouchen Lin·Liwei Wang·Hang Su·Jun Zhu·Zhifang Sui·Jiajun Zhang·Yang Liu·Xiaodong He·Minlie Huang·Jian Tang·Jie Tang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With the rapid development of deep learning, training Big Models (BMs) for multiple downstream tasks becomes a popular paradigm. Researchers have achieved various outcomes in the construction of BMs and the BM application in many fields. At present, there is a lack of research work that sorts out the overall progress of BMs and guides the follow-up research. In this paper, we cover not only the BM technologies themselves but also the prerequisites for BM training and applications with BMs, dividing the BM review into four parts: Resource, Models, Key Technologies and Application. We introduce 16 specific BM-related topics in those four parts, they are Data, Knowledge, Computing System, Parallel Training System, Language Model, Vision Model, Multi-modal Model, Theory&Interpretability, Commonsense Reasoning, Reliability&Security, Governance, Evaluation, Machine Translation, Text Generation, Dialogue and Protein Research. In each topic, we summarize clearly the current studies and propose some future research directions. At the end of this paper, we conclude the further development of BMs in a more general view.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sha Yuan, Hanyu Zhao, Shuai Zhao, Jiahong Leng, Yangxiao Liang, Xiaozhi Wang, Jifan Yu, Xin Lv, Zhou Shao, Jiaao He, Yankai Lin, Xu Han, Zhenghao Liu, Ning Ding, Yongming Rao, Yizhao Gao, Liang Zhang, Ming Ding, Cong Fang, Yisen Wang, Mingsheng Long, Jing Zhang, Yinpeng Dong, Tianyu Pang, Peng Cui, Lingxiao Huang, Zheng Liang, Huawei Shen, Hui Zhang, Quanshi Zhang, Qingxiu Dong, Zhixing Tan, Mingxuan Wang, Shuo Wang, Long Zhou, Haoran Li, Junwei Bao, Yingwei Pan, Weinan Zhang, Zhou Yu, Rui Yan, Chence Shi, Minghao Xu, Zuobai Zhang, Guoqiang Wang, Xiang Pan, Mengjie Li, Xiaoyu Chu, Zijun Yao, Fangwei Zhu, Shulin Cao, Weicheng Xue, Zixuan Ma, Zhengyan Zhang, Shengding Hu, Yujia Qin, Chaojun Xiao, Zheni Zeng, Ganqu Cui, Weize Chen, Weilin Zhao, Yuan Yao, Peng Li, Wenzhao Zheng, Wenliang Zhao, Ziyi Wang, Borui Zhang, Nanyi Fei, Anwen Hu, Zenan Ling, Haoyang Li, Boxi Cao, Xianpei Han, Weidong Zhan, Baobao Chang, Hao Sun, Jiawen Deng, Chujie Zheng, Juanzi Li, Lei Hou, Xigang Cao, Jidong Zhai, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Jiwen Lu, Zhiwu Lu, Qin Jin, Ruihua Song, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhouchen Lin, Liwei Wang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, Zhifang Sui, Jiajun Zhang, Yang Liu, Xiaodong He, Minlie Huang, Jian Tang, Jie Tang. 2022-03-26. A Roadmap for Big Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14101

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗