arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Weinan Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Weinan Zhang.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Agent Planning Benchmark: A Diagnostic Framework for Planning Capabilities in LLM Agents

Planning is central to LLM agents: before acting, an agent must decompose goals, select tools, reason over constraints, and decide when a task is infeasible. Yet existing agent evaluations often report only end-to-end success, making it difficult to determine whether failures stem from planning or execution. We introduce Agent Planning Benchmark (APB), a planning-specific diagnostic benchmark with 4,209 multimodal cases across 22 domains and five settings, covering holistic planning, feedback-conditioned step-wise planning, and robustness under extraneous tools, broken tools, and unsolvable tasks. Across 12 MLLMs, APB reveals systematic weaknesses in long-horizon planning, tool-noise robustness, calibrated refusal, and inference-time refinement. We further validate APB on 200 ToolSandbox tasks and 200 $τ^2$-bench tasks, where APB-guided refinement consistently improves plan correctness, plan grade, and downstream execution metrics across three representative models. APB thus serves as an upstream diagnostic complement to execution benchmarks. The APB benchmark and code are available in \href{https://github.com/Mikivishy/AgentPlanningBenchmark}{this URL}.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Profiling a Frontier Agent with EBench: From Direct Control to Harness with Policy

Frontier multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can control robots without robot-specific training, but how their capabilities compare and interact with post-trained vision-language-action (VLA) and world action model (WAM) policies across manipulation demands remains to be thoroughly evaluated. In this report, we evaluate GPT-6-Astra on EBench as the core of an agent that controls a robot through an agent harness under the same visual and proprioceptive observation protocol as post-trained policies. We study two agent configurations: direct control, in which the agent generates waypoint commands directly, and harness with policy, in which it can also invoke a post-trained VLA or WAM policy for action execution. Under direct control, the agent achieves competitive overall performance relative to post-trained policies. It leads on short-horizon tasks and exhibits the least performance variation across generalization dimensions, whereas it underperforms post-trained policies on long-horizon tasks, tabletop manipulation, and high-precision contact-rich tasks. In the harness with policy, invoking a post-trained VLA or WAM combines the complementary strengths of both components, raising overall task success to the level of the strongest compared post-trained policies while substantially reducing token cost. However, performance remains below the per-task upper bound of the standalone components due to suboptimal policy invocation, fixed-instruction execution without subgoals, and grasp disruption when the agent resumes control. Overall, our study characterizes the capability boundary of a frontier MLLM agent and suggests directions for improving future agent harness design. Project page: https://internrobotics.github.io/EBench-Astra-Tech-Report/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

MultiEvoSkill: Structure-Aware Multi-Agent Skill Evolution for Generalizable Skill Artifacts

Skill documents are becoming the default adaptation surface for frozen large language model (LLM) agents, but current skill generators face two key limitations. First, humans and different LLMs differ in how they organize procedural knowledge and approach task solving. Skills authored from a human or single-model perspective may therefore fail to align with the reasoning behaviors of other backbones, limiting cross-model generalization. Second, sequential skill descriptions inadequately represent procedures with parallel branches and explicit dependencies, while existing skill optimizers primarily operate on prose and lack explicit support for graph-structured skill evolution. We introduce MultiEvoSkill, a skill-optimization framework comprising three core components: 1) Skill compiler casts the skill as a typed graph with tailored operators, producing a compact, informative representation with explicit procedural topology; 2) Heterogeneous agent system proposes revision advices using collective intelligence, where minimal and informative issues are identified based on multiple sets of experiences. 3) Structure-aware debate and evolution mechanism organizes candidate edits into a heterogeneous graph, resolves them under dependency and importance constraints, and distills the collective proposal into the artifact. Multi-dimensional gating ensures the information gain and topological correctness of each evolution. Optimal skills are then obtained when the system converges at a consistent state. Various experiments and ablations against SOTA methods validate the effectiveness and generalization of MultiEvoSkill.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Relative braid group symmetries on modified iquantum groups and their modules

We present a comprehensive generalization of Lusztig's braid group symmetries for quasi-split iquantum groups. Specifically, we give 3 explicit rank one formulas for symmetries acting on integrable modules over a quasi-split iquantum group of arbitrary Kac-Moody type with general parameters. These symmetries are formulated in terms of idivided powers and iweights of the vectors being acted upon. We show that these symmetries are consistent with the relative braid group symmetries on iquantum groups, and they are also related to Lusztig's symmetries via quasi $K$-matrices. Furthermore, through appropriate rescaling, we obtain compatible symmetries for the integral forms of modified iquantum groups and their integrable modules. We verify that these symmetries satisfy the relative braid group relations.

math.QA↗
arXiv2026

Beyond Imitation: Reinforcement Learning-Based Sim-Real Co-Training for VLA Models

Simulation offers a scalable and low-cost way to enrich vision-language-action (VLA) training, reducing reliance on expensive real-robot demonstrations. However, most sim-real co-training methods rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which treats simulation as a static source of demonstrations and does not exploit large-scale closed-loop interaction. Consequently, real-world gains and generalization are often limited. In this paper, we propose an RL-based sim-real Co-training (RL-Co) framework that leverages interactive simulation while preserving real-world capabilities. Our method follows a generic two-stage design: we first warm-start the policy with SFT on a mixture of real and simulated demonstrations, then fine-tune it with reinforcement learning in simulation while adding an auxiliary supervised loss on real-world data to anchor the policy and mitigate catastrophic forgetting. We evaluate our framework on four real-world tabletop manipulation tasks using two representative VLA architectures, OpenVLA and $π_{0.5}$, and observe consistent improvements over real-only fine-tuning and SFT-based co-training, including +24% real-world success on OpenVLA and +20% on $π_{0.5}$. Beyond higher success rates, RL co-training yields stronger generalization to unseen task variations and substantially improved real-world data efficiency, providing a practical and scalable pathway for leveraging simulation to enhance real-robot deployment.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

From Predictive Geometry to Action: Learning Complementary Predictive Representations for Embodied Manipulation

Effective manipulation requires a policy to capture not only about the current scene geometry, but also about how that geometry will evolve under interaction. Existing approaches either augment policies with geometric information from current observations or introduce future prediction as auxiliary supervision, leaving open how predictive geometry should be represented for action generation. Therefore, we propose a two-stage framework, which learns complementary predictive representations from multi-view video clips. During pretraining, a frozen 3D foundation model provides dense geometric features that are compressed into predictive geometric representations and optimized to preserve scene structure and its temporal evolution. Action supervision is then applied to geometric transitions to extract a complementary motor representation that emphasizes action-relevant transitions. During downstream post-training, predictive geometry is transferred through geometry queries, while the motor representation guides intermediate features along the action-generation pathway. Future observations are used only as privileged supervision during training and are not required at inference time. Across LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, SimplerEnv, and real-world bimanual and single-arm tasks, our approach consistently improves downstream policies, including an absolute gain of 10.4 percentage points on the WidowX evaluation. We further demonstrate transfer across multiple VLA architectures and WAMs, with improvements in both future-world and action prediction. The code will be available at https://github.com/xuxiaoxxxx/CPR.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Quantum symmetric spaces at roots of 1

We study the integral form of quantized coordinate algebras of symmetric spaces and its specializations at roots of unity. Our main tool is an integral localization, whose classical specialization recovers the open Borel orbit in the symmetric space. At a suitable odd root of unity, we prove that the quantum symmetric space is a finite projective module over its Frobenius center, which is canonically isomorphic to the classical coordinate algebra of the symmetric space. We show that the fibre algebras are isomorphic along each double Bruhat cell of the symmetric space. We determine the PI degree and propose a conjectural dimension formula for irreducible modules. In the simply connected case, we introduce a framed Kac-Moody data, which leads to a description of fibre algebras of quantum symmetric spaces via those of quantum Schubert cells.

math.RT↗
arXiv2026

Physical AI: Concepts, Techniques, and Challenges

In recent years, physical artificial intelligence (physical AI) has experienced rapid development, capturing significant attention in academia and industry. However, the field has yet to reach consensus on its definition, technical landscape, and core challenges. To address this gap, this monograph seeks to define physical AI, present its technical landscape, and examine each key technical subfield in depth. In doing so, it establishes a unified framework for Physical AI: artificial systems that perceive, model, and act upon the physical world through continuous feedback under real-world constraints. Further, this monograph distinguishes physical AI from conventional digital AI, embodied AI, cyber-physical systems, and digital twins. It develops the foundations of physical AI across physics, control, cognition, learning, and reasoning. It reviews key methodologies, including multimodal perception, physical data and simulation, world models, embodied foundation models, motor-control systems, multi-agent coordination, and hardware-software co-design. Furthermore, it examines applications spanning robotics, manufacturing, infrastructure, scientific experimentation, and autonomous services. Particular attention is given to sim-to-real transfer, reliability, real-time execution, evaluation, safety, governance, and long-term deployment. By connecting perception, prediction, decision-making, action, and adaptation in a closed loop, this monograph identifies the technical challenges and research directions required to advance from narrow automation toward more generalizable physical AI and, ultimately, physical artificial general intelligence (Physical AGI).

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Test-Time Compute for Humanoid Behavior Foundation Models

Humanoid Behavior Foundation Models (BFMs) can execute impressive motions, but downstream applications such as loco-manipulation demand high whole-body positional accuracy. Existing BFMs suffer from a systematic command-execution gap, where executed motions deviate from desired ones. We show that additional test-time compute can improve execution without retraining the BFM. First, we introduce Test-Time Command Optimization (TTCO), which adapts the input command to the specific BFM to produce an executed trajectory closer to the desired motion. TTCO finds such commands by sampling-based optimization through closed-loop simulations of the BFM and robot dynamics. Across three BFMs on the AMASS dataset, TTCO reduces mean global body-position error by 79-84% in simulation. Second, we analyze test-time compute scaling and derive an approximate compute-optimal strategy that can sustain performance gains as the compute budget increases. Third, TTCO can generate BFM-specific action labels from recorded robot trajectories without requiring the original teleoperation body-motion commands. Simulation and real-robot experiments show that these labels are effective for training high-level loco-manipulation policies. This method also supports reusing existing demonstrations across BFMs.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Evaluating Agentic Capabilities Before Post-Training: An End-to-End Approach

Agentic capabilities are increasingly important for modern LLMs, yet remain difficult to evaluate during pretraining. Existing approaches typically rely on static trajectory-derived tasks or likelihood-based proxies, which are lightweight but provide limited visibility into how base models behave in interactive environments. We introduce ASAP (Agent Scaffold Adaptation for Pretraining Evaluation), a lightweight framework for eliciting and evaluating agentic behavior from pretrained base models on end-to-end tasks. Rather than converting base models into chat-style agents, ASAP preserves the completion interface and adapts existing agent scaffolds through structured trajectory continuation, short reference prefixes, and minimal recovery mechanisms. Across software-engineering and deep-research benchmarks, ASAP yields discriminative end-to-end performance across base models and pretraining checkpoints. Beyond aggregate scores, ASAP exposes model-generated execution trajectories, enabling analysis of exploration, editing, testing, recovery, and task completion across training stages. These trajectories provide a behavioral view of how agent-relevant capabilities change during pretraining and how execution patterns differ after post-training. Our results suggest that end-to-end agent evaluation can complement conventional pretraining benchmarks by providing a practical diagnostic of interactive model behavior.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

LabCompiler: A Framework for Verifiable Human-Machine Laboratory Execution from Imperfect Protocols

Closing the loop of AI-driven science requires reliably translating natural-language protocols into executable laboratory workflows despite protocol defects and heterogeneous hardware. Existing approaches often couple scientific interpretation with device-specific code generation, making errors difficult to localize and limiting reuse across laboratory platforms. We introduce LabCompiler, a robust protocol-to-execution framework that transforms imperfect natural-language protocols into verifiable human-machine workflows. Its protocol firewall diagnoses and repairs defects before compilation while preserving unaffected content, guided by troubleshooting knowledge accumulated through perturbation-guided self-evolution. A two-level, device-agnostic graph representation separates experimental semantics from hardware-specific implementation and supports capability-based device assignment with coordinated human execution. We further introduce a protocol recovery benchmark covering four controlled perturbation types and naturally occurring errors collected from protocols written by iGEM participants. Experiments show that LabCompiler outperforms frontier LLMs in protocol error correction while enabling coordinated human-machine execution across heterogeneous, partially automated laboratory settings.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

LabOPBench: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Laboratory Decision Making

Laboratory experiments involve more than following predefined protocols; they require adaptive decision-making as the experimental state changes. Existing scientific benchmarks rarely assess such evidence-based decisions in laboratory settings. Here we present LabOPBench, a multimodal benchmark of 756 expert-authored, independently reviewed questions in organic synthesis and materials science. Each item pairs laboratory evidence with procedural context and an open-ended judgment, evaluated using a question-specific scoring rubric. Eight multimodal models obtain overall normalized scores of 28.8-45.8%, leaving substantial room for improvement. On a controlled 100-question subset, the strongest models outperform undergraduate participants on average but remain below the average performance of PhD participants. Expert analysis of responses from the three leading models identifies Evidence Misreading and Evidence-Decision Conflict as the dominant error patterns. These results reveal that current models still struggle to turn multimodal perception into reliable laboratory decision-making.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Who Improves the Robot? Toward Physical Recursive Self-Improvement

Robots are increasingly autonomous in task execution, yet their improvement remains largely human-driven. This study investigates Physical Recursive Self-Improvement (Physical RSI), in which physical experience guides lasting updates to both a robot's capabilities and its improvement procedure, making subsequent improvement more effective across tasks. Physical RSI faces challenges from noisy observations, continuous dynamics, costly trials, and irreversible consequences. We present an L0-L5 framework that differentiates capability-level from meta-level updates and within-task from across-task gains, reserving L5 for independently verified recursive gain. We study existing methods around harness adaptation and model training, alongside safety and control mechanisms that govern execution and successive updates. Our analysis reveals that, despite substantial progress in self-improvement, the surveyed literature does not yet demonstrate Physical RSI as defined by our framework. We identify research priorities in reliable feedback, causal attribution, safety preservation, and benchmarking, outlining a path toward robots that autonomously improve how they learn while ensuring safety. The GitHub repository for Physical RSI is available at https://github.com/SAIL-Research-Lab/Physical-RSI.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

EgoExplorer: A Vision-Motion-Touch Observatory for Human Loco-Manipulation In Situ

Learning humanoid loco-manipulation from human demonstrations rests on observing how locomotion, posture, and object interaction evolve together as tasks unfold. Scaling collection across diverse environments, in turn, favors lightweight, portable capture systems. Yet, existing datasets provide only partial views of this coordination. Thus, we introduce EgoExplorer, a 100-hour vision-motion-touch observatory of human loco-manipulation built with a wearable system. With an emphasis on professional activities, its continuous recordings align egocentric video with reconstructed whole-body motion, fine-grained finger articulation, and tactile observations, accompanied by step-level descriptions. To achieve this coverage with sparse body sensing, we develop the Calibrate-Complete-Constrain pipeline. Concretely, reusable calibration fixes participant geometry and sensor attachments before motion inference to disentangle mounting offsets from articulation. A temporal prior then completes unobserved joint motion, while layered constraints promote measurement agreement, temporal continuity, and geometric consistency, properties that motion plausibility alone does not guarantee. Against tracker-fitted references, the method reduces body-point error by 71.9% relative to the strongest baseline; matched evaluations also show gains in hand stability and contact estimation. Preliminary studies explore multimodal generation and conditioning alongside humanoid retargeting with whole-body control in simulation.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

MARFT: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Fine-Tuning

Large Language Model (LLM)-based Multi-Agent Systems (LaMAS) offer a promising approach to collaborative tasks, but applying reinforcement learning to these systems remains challenging because classical multi-agent reinforcement learning assumptions do not fully capture their dependency structures, heterogeneous roles, and autoregressive outputs. This article provides a tutorial-style overview of the transition from reinforcement learning to reinforcement fine-tuning in single-agent and multi-agent settings, highlighting the differences between classical MARL and LLM-based multi-agent optimization. We introduce Multi-Agent Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (MARFT) and formalize LaMAS optimization as a Flexible Markov Game (Flex-MG). The MARFT framework combines predecessor-conditioned policy optimization, a centralized critic, parameter-efficient adapters, and token-level credit assignment. Our token-level analysis clarifies how within-action discounting affects returns and establishes consistency with action-level returns when the token discount is one. Experiments on fixed two- to four-agent mathematical and coding workflows compare MARFT with and without policy parameter sharing against IPPO. Both variants report higher mean evaluation scores in all 24 benchmark-team-size settings, while the variant without parameter sharing shows the clearest advantage in final training reward. Role-specification ablations examine how prescribed roles affect training. We conclude with application perspectives and open challenges, including dynamic workflows, sample efficiency, and system-level reliability. Code: https://github.com/jwliao-ai/MARFT.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

MemQ: Integrating Q-Learning into Self-Evolving Memory Agents over Provenance DAGs

Episodic memory allows LLM agents to accumulate and retrieve experience, but current methods treat each memory independently, i.e., evaluating retrieval quality in isolation without accounting for the dependency chains through which memories enable the creation of future memories. We introduce MemQ, which applies TD($λ$) eligibility traces to memory Q-values, propagating credit backward through a provenance DAG that records which memories were retrieved when each new memory was created. Credit weight decays as $(γλ)^d$ with DAG depth $d$, replacing temporal distance with structural proximity. We formalize this setting as an Exogenous-Context MDP, separating externally supplied tasks from the evolving memory store, and represent retrieval-set values by a first-order mean of per-memory values plus an explicit approximation residual. Across five interaction, code-generation, and agentic benchmarks, MemQ improves average held-out, final runtime, and cumulative success rates over the baseline with the highest average for each metric by 2.53, 4.23, and 2.13 percentage points, respectively. Ablations on LiveCodeBench, BFCL, and DSBench support the benefit of bootstrapping and multi-depth credit propagation. Analyses of Q-values and runtime learning show that learned memory values are associated with subsequent success and that MemQ retains more of its historical task coverage. We also explore the limits of MemQ's benefits using multiple-choice reasoning tasks, where limited interaction offers fewer opportunities to reuse procedural experience. Code is available at https://github.com/jwliao-ai/MemQ.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Embodied Skill Bench: Benchmarking How Well Agents with Embodied Skills Perform on Physical Tasks

LLM agents increasingly control robots using VLA policies, perception models, and procedural knowledge. These modules are difficult to reuse because their interfaces, embodiment assumptions, and conditions of use differ, and their benefits on physical tasks remain unclear. We package them as embodied skills that extend agent skills with explicit embodiment assumptions and conditions of use, building 250 action, perception, and experience skills from 1,052 resources. On this basis we introduce EmbodiedSkillBench, which runs an agent in a closed observation-action loop and records success, actions, tokens, and wall-clock time. It supports three modes: native control, skill-only execution, and Agent-Directed Reuse (ADR), a mode we propose in which the agent keeps its native controls and decides for each skill whether to invoke, modify, or ignore it. Across four agents on 100 perturbed LIBERO-Pro tasks, we find that skills help an agent only as far as they exceed what it can already do. Skill-only execution lifts GPT-5.6-Sol from 11% to 63% and Kimi-K3 and Claude-Opus-5 by about 20 points, while cutting their token usage by 58% to 85%. Yet all four agents then end up between 61% and 64%, and GPT-6-Astra falls from 92% under native control to 61%. This suggests that as agents grow stronger, the role of embodied skills shifts from supplying missing capability to reducing cost: GPT-6-Astra already solves most tasks through native control, so restricting it to skills removes more than it adds. Under ADR, which lets it keep native control and call skills selectively, GPT-6-Astra recovers to 85%, within 7 points of native control, while using 14.1% fewer tokens and 11.9% less time. With Jev as a skill choosing motion directions and gripper actions, it reaches 81% with 50% fewer tokens and 57% less time. The code is available at https://github.com/HanZhi306/EmbodiedSkill-Bench.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

PhysCodeGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Physically Verifiable 4D Reconstruction

Building physical simulations from video requires coding agents to translate observations into executable models and refine them through tool use. We introduce PhysCodeGym, a benchmark for physically verifiable 4D reconstruction with $156$ tasks covering rigid-body, liquid, deformable, and wind-driven motion. Agents autonomously inspect videos, write and run Blender programs, and revise their scenes using simulation feedback. Six metrics combine rule-based measurements with rubric-based judgments to assess visual and physical reconstruction quality. Program inspection, scene measurements, and counterfactual interventions test physical consistency under original and modified conditions. Experiments with frontier coding agents reveal a tradeoff between artifact quality and completion across reasoning-effort settings, while harness comparisons and agent traces link verification behavior with reconstruction performance. Case studies show that matching visible objects and events can coexist with physical defects. Counterfactual tests further expose latent contact and support failures in reconstructions that pass ordinary physical checks, highlighting the gap between reproducing observations and building reliable physical models. Code is available at https://github.com/ShaoShuai0605/PhysCodeGym.

cs.AI↗