How to distinguish between indistinguishable particles

Michael te Vrugt

doi:10.1086/718495

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2112.00178

How to distinguish between indistinguishable particles

Michael te Vrugt

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A long and intense debate in philosophy is concerned with the question whether there can be haecceistic differences between possible worlds, that is, nonqualitative differences that only arise from different de re representations. According to haecceitism, it can give rise to a different situation if the positions of two qualitatively identical particles are exchanged, while according to anti-haecceitism, this is not the case. It has been suggested that classical statistical mechanics might provide evidence for one of these positions. However, most philosophers of physics argue that it does not. In this article, we show that order-preserving dynamics, a novel method from statistical mechanics developed for the description of nonergodic systems, changes this situation: It is intrinsically haecceistic and makes different experimental predictions than non-haecceistic alternatives. Thereby, it provides an empirical argument for the existence of modality de re.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-ph cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Michael te Vrugt. 2021-11-30. How to distinguish between indistinguishable particles. https://doi.org/10.1086/718495

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Geometry of the "Gauge Argument"

We show how the "gauge argument", widely criticized by philosophers as ad hoc and unconvincing, may be reconstructed rigorously, and, we believe, convincingly, as an argument concerning the geometry of vector bundles. In this form, the gauge argument has two parts, the first of which is strongly analogous to the Weyl-Stein argument for Galilean spacetime as the appropriate setting for Newtonian gravitation; and the second of which invokes a classic result in the Yang-Mills theory literature, due to Utiyama [1956, "Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction", Phys. Rev. 101, 1597].

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

Rethinking Symmetry Principles and Partial Observables With Reference Frames

Dynamically uncoupled fields are a modelling device used in the literature on reference frames, classical and quantum. We argue that the device is not innocuous. First, uncoupled fields violate Earman's symmetry principle SP1---that every dynamical symmetry is a spacetime symmetry---and the violation, unlike the familiar Newtonian one, cannot be repaired by excising surplus spacetime structure: it arises from a deficit of dynamical structure, not an excess of spatiotemporal structure. This qualifies implicit assumptions of Earman's SP1, while leaving its diagnostic role intact. Second, uncoupled fields expose a lacuna in the partial/complete observables programme: only dynamically coupled fields can serve as bona-fide partial observables, so partial observability is derivative on complete observability. We then reinterpret the standard formalism for partial observables: qua measurable, a partial observable is a relational quantity expressed with respect to an uncoupled frame, and it remains gauge-variant. This reinterpretation vindicates Rovelli's claim that partial observables are individually measurable, against Thiemann and Adlam, and separates two properties easily conflated in the generally covariant formulations of theories: invariance under diffeomorphisms and invariance along the gauge flow.

physics.hist-ph↗

arXiv2026

Becoming, Duration, and the Evolving Block Universe

The two-times problem asks how the directed, oriented time of biological and conscious systems relates to the time of fundamental physics. The Evolving Block Universe, in which spacetime grows through an irreversible quantum dynamics along physically preferred worldlines, accounts for the direction of physical time and for its emergence across scales up to the time kept by the brain. It leaves open the relation between this physical time and the experience of passage. We argue that Bergson's durée, the continuous qualitative experience of lived time, names this residue and marks the first-person level at which the physical hierarchy reaches its limit. On this reading the two accounts divide the problem between them: the Evolving Block Universe describes its structural, third-person half, and durée its experiential, first-person half. The remaining gap between the two halves is explanatory. It is an instance of the familiar gap between the physical description of a system and the character of its states as they are lived, and it is compatible with physicalism.

physics.hist-ph↗