arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2007.02687

Particle Identification at MeV Energies in JUNO

Abstract

JUNO is a multi-purpose neutrino experiment currently under construction in Jiangmen, China. It is primary aiming to determine the neutrino mass ordering. Moreover, its 20\,kt target mass makes it an ideal detector to study neutrinos from various sources, including nuclear reactors, the Earth and its atmosphere, the Sun, and even supernovae. Due to the small cross section of neutrino interactions, the event rate of neutrino experiments is limited. In order to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, it is extremely important to control the background levels. In this paper we discuss the potential of particle identification in JUNO, its underlying principles and possible areas of application in the experiment. While the presented concepts can be transferred to any large liquid scintillator detector, our methods are evaluated specifically for JUNO and the results are mainly driven by its high optical photon yield of 1,200 photo electrons per MeV of deposited energy. In order to investigate the potential of event discrimination, several event pairings are analysed, i.e. $α/β$, $p/β$, $e^+/e^-$, and $e^-/γ$. We compare the discrimination performance of advanced analytical techniques based on neural networks and on the topological event reconstruction keeping the standard Gatti filter as a reference. We use the Monte Carlo samples generated in the physically motivated energy intervals. We study the dependence of our cuts on energy, radial position, PMT time resolution, and dark noise. The results show an excellent performance for $α/β$ and $p/β$ with the Gatti method and the neural network. Furthermore, $e^+/e^-$ and $e^-/γ$ can partly be distinguished by means of neural network and topological reconstruction on a statistical basis. Especially in the latter case, the topological method proved very successful.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Livia Ludhova, Henning Rebber, Björn Soenke Wonsak, Yu Xu. 2020-10-13. Particle Identification at MeV Energies in JUNO. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221%2F16%2F01%2Fp01016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Development of an Extensible Unified Control System Using the STARS Framework and Common Commands for Detector Control

A zooming optical system comprising two Fresnel zone plates (FZPs) was developed and installed at the AR-NE1A beamline of the Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan. To ensure reliable and versatile operation, we implemented a dedicated control architecture based on the Simple Transmission and Retrieval System (STARS) framework and the newly proposed STARS Common Commands for Detector Control (CCDC)---a data-acquisition (DAQ) state model and command set designed specifically for detector control. The system serves both as a practical control system for the zooming optics and as a demonstration of modular extensibility using STARS and detector interoperability through CCDC. The system has been commissioned, and its performance has been verified at the AR-NE1A beamline. The architecture enables flexible configuration of optical components and provides a unified interface for both routine operation and advanced experimental protocols.

physics.ins-det

Agentic TCAD Calibration Workflow for Oxide Semiconductor Transistors

Experimental TCAD calibration is essential for predictive technology modeling of emerging oxide semiconductor transistors. However, it remains time-consuming and expert dependent because of model ambiguity. Multiple physical models and parameter sets can reproduce the same measured transfer characteristics, while local fitting alone cannot uniquely identify the underlying device physics. We present the first demonstration of an agentic TCAD calibration workflow for a fabricated bottom-gate In--W--O (BG-IWO) transistor. Starting from the measured transfer curve and device information, the workflow uses measurement--TCAD residuals and local sensitivity tests to select bounded parameter corrections or evaluate additional physical models, and accept only updates that improve device metrics. The LLM agent orchestrates the workflow, while Sentaurus governs the device physics. For the 2\%-W reference device, five agent-suggested updates yield a fixed calibrated model, reducing the multi-metric device objective $J$ by 14.3$\times$. Maximum $V_{\mathrm{th}}$/$I_{\mathrm{on}}$ errors are 36.1~mV/0.022 decade for varying-drain-bias tests and 46.2~mV/0.062 decade for varying-channel-length tests, demonstrating model transferability across bias and geometry rather than a local parameter fit. W-composition tests provide process-sensitive insight. This agentic workflow provides a faster route to model development for emerging device technologies.

physics.ins-det

Birefringence of AlGaAs/GaAs Coatings under Above-Band-Gap Illumination, GR Noise and Photo-Optic Transfer Function

AlGaAs/GaAs coatings are being considered as coating candidates for gravitational-wave detectors. In this paper we investigate the birefringence properties of this crystalline semiconductor material by modulating the optical illumination on the mirror coating and monitoring the induced birefringence. While the measured low-frequency birefringence values align with previous studies, we observed a frequency-dependent behavior in the illumination-to-birefringence coupling, characterized by a pole increasing with illumination intensity and a gain at zero frequency (DC gain) decreasing with illumination intensity. We developed a generic theoretical model based on a master equation to characterize the measurement results by considering photon-induced electric fields and electro-optic effects. This model can fit the frequency and intensity dependencies of the induced birefringence. Additionally, this model predicts a generation-recombination noise (GR noise) will be observable in the coating birefringence. While the presented measurement cannot predict the exact level of GR noise, for the frequency band and spot sizes relevant for gravitational-wave detectors we expect GR noise to be white below the pole frequency, scale with power the same way laser shot noise does, and for fixed power be independent of spot size.

physics.ins-det