arXiv · 1712.09697
Reply to Marchildon: absorption and non-unitarity remain well-defined in the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation
Abstract
I rebut some erroneous statements and attempt to clear up some misunderstandings in a recent set of critical remarks by Marchildon regarding the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation (RTI), showing that his negative conclusions regarding the transactional model are ill-founded.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
R. E. Kastner. 2017-12-27. Reply to Marchildon: absorption and non-unitarity remain well-defined in the Relativistic Transactional Interpretation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09697
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.