arXiv · 1607.07871
Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
Abstract
Huw Price has proposed an argument that suggests a time-symmetric ontology for quantum theory must necessarily be retrocausal, i.e. it must involve influences that travel backwards in time. One of Price's assumptions is that the quantum state is a state of reality. However, one of the reasons for exploring retrocausality is that it offers the potential for evading the consequences of no-go theorems, including recent proofs of the reality of the quantum state. Here, we show that this assumption can be replaced by a different assumption, called $\lambda$-mediation, that plausibly holds independently of the status of the quantum state. We also reformulate the other assumptions behind the argument to place them in a more general framework and pin down the notion of time symmetry involved more precisely. We show that our assumptions imply a timelike analogue of Bell's local causality criterion and, in doing so, give a new interpretation of timelike violations of Bell inequalities. Namely, they show the impossibility of a (non-retrocausal) time-symmetric ontology.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Matthew Leifer, Matthew Pusey. 2016-07-26. Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0607
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.