arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1411.2236

On Hopf adjunctions, Hopf monads and Frobenius-type properties

Abstract

Let $U$ be a strong monoidal functor between monoidal categories. If it has both a left adjoint $L$ and a right adjoint $R$, we show that the pair $(R,L)$ is a linearly distributive functor and $(U,U)\dashv (R,L)$ is a linearly distributive adjunction, if and only if $L\dashv U$ is a Hopf adjunction and $U\dashv R$ is a coHopf adjunction. We give sufficient conditions for a strong monoidal $U$ which is part of a (left) Hopf adjunction $L\dashv U$, to have as right adjoint a twisted version of the left adjoint $L$. In particular, the resulting adjunction will be (left) coHopf. One step further, we prove that if $L$ is precomonadic and $L\mathbf I$ is a Frobenius monoid (where $\mathbf I$ denotes the unit object of the monoidal category), then $L\dashv U\dashv L$ is an ambidextrous adjunction, and $L$ is a Frobenius monoidal functor. We transfer these results to Hopf monads: we show that under suitable exactness assumptions, a Hopf monad $T$ on a monoidal category has a right adjoint which is also a Hopf comonad, if the object $T\mathbf I$ is dualizable as a free $T$-algebra. In particular, if $T\mathbf I$ is a Frobenius monoid in the monoidal category of $T$-algebras and $T$ is of descent type, then $T$ is a Frobenius monad and a Frobenius monoidal functor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adriana Balan. 2016-02-03. On Hopf adjunctions, Hopf monads and Frobenius-type properties. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-016-9428-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Mixing Extriangulated Model Structures

Let $(\mathscr{C},\mathbb{E},\mathfrak{s})$ be a weakly idempotent complete extriangulated category. We generalize Cole's Theorem to construct a mixed admissible model structure $\mathcal{M}_m$ from two compatible admissible model structures relative to proper classes $ξ_1\subseteqξ_2$ of $\mathscr{C}$. We then explicitly characterize the cofibrant objects of $\mathcal{M}_m$. Finally, we apply these results to exact and triangulated categories, recovering and extending recent work on mixed model structures.

math.CT

Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories

For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagger categories and cofree dagger categories via internal dagger category structure. To characterize cofree dagger categories, we use rectangular bands and show that a dagger category is cofree if and only if it is enriched over rectangular bands. For free dagger categories, we define the notion of a zigzag dagger category, and then show that a dagger category is free if and only if it is a zigzag dagger category. We also show that free dagger categories can be characterized as the coalgebras of the induced comonad from the free dagger category adjunction, and similarly that cofree free dagger categories can be characterized as the algebras of the induced monad from the cofree dagger category adjunction.

math.CT

A Counterexample to the Open Question on Object Ideals

We give a counterexample to completeness descent from ideal cotorsion pairs to their objects. A radical-square-zero algebra on the two-cycle gives a finite-dimensional example. The construction is intrinsically non-weakly-idempotent-complete.

math.CT