arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1409.1102

The Role of Peer Influence in Churn in Wireless Networks

Qiwei Han·Pedro Ferreira
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Subscriber churn remains a top challenge for wireless carriers. These carriers need to understand the determinants of churn to confidently apply effective retention strategies to ensure their profitability and growth. In this paper, we look at the effect of peer influence on churn and we try to disentangle it from other effects that drive simultaneous churn across friends but that do not relate to peer influence. We analyze a random sample of roughly 10 thousand subscribers from large dataset from a major wireless carrier over a period of 10 months. We apply survival models and generalized propensity score to identify the role of peer influence. We show that the propensity to churn increases when friends do and that it increases more when many strong friends churn. Therefore, our results suggest that churn managers should consider strategies aimed at preventing group churn. We also show that survival models fail to disentangle homophily from peer influence over-estimating the effect of peer influence.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIcs.CYphysics.soc-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qiwei Han, Pedro Ferreira. 2014-09-03. The Role of Peer Influence in Churn in Wireless Networks. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639968.2640057

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SparkAlign: A Star-Hopping Heuristic for Efficient Unsupervised Plain Graph Alignment

Unsupervised plain graph alignment (UPGA) seeks corresponding nodes between two graphs from topology alone, without attributes or seed anchors. The dominant embed-then-match paradigm is expensive on both fronts: it repeatedly retrains node embeddings and then solves a costly global assignment, so it scales poorly to large graphs. We present SparkAlign, a training-free heuristic that, inspired by star-hopping in celestial navigation, locates a node's counterpart by measuring its heat-diffusion proximity to a shared set of high-confidence landmark matches. Although heuristic in spirit, the descriptor is principled: diffusion makes structurally equivalent nodes comparable across graphs, and a short stability analysis justifies a finite diffusion depth. Matching then uses two sparse, highly parallel strategies that avoid dense global assignment, one favoring speed and one preserving one-to-one consistency on a restricted candidate set. On three benchmarks SparkAlign attains accuracy approaching a structural identifiability reference while running up to two orders of magnitude faster than the strongest baseline and seeding markedly more accurate pseudo-anchors. Our code is available at https://github.com/MaxQ545/SparkAlign

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Theoretical Analysis of DomiRank Centrality: Automorphism, Entropy, and Graph Transformations

DomiRank is a node-importance algorithm for unweighted networks, defined by a dynamical-system model whose steady state is governed by a competition-strength parameter, a dominance threshold, and a natural decay rate. We study its intrinsic relations with graph automorphism: vertices mapped to each other by an automorphism share the same DomiRank value, and a graph whose DomiRank values are pairwise distinct must be asymmetric; we derive DomiRank properties of regular and vertex-transitive graphs and bound the number of orbits by that of distinct DomiRank values. For DomiRank entropy, the maximum over connected graphs is attained only by regular graphs, and under sufficient conditions (rigorously in the low-competition regime) the entropy decreases monotonically with the competition parameter, a behavior observed on all tested networks and conjectured to hold generally; tuning sigma shifts the identification from important to dominant key nodes. We also study how graph transformations (vertex similarity, vertex partitions, edge swaps, m-products) affect the DomiRank vector, and characterize analytically the sensitivity and limiting behavior of sigma: the normalized DomiRank distribution is sigma-invariant iff the degree vector is an eigenvector of the adjacency matrix, and sigma interpolates continuously between degree and least-eigenvector centrality; experiments on four real networks confirm these results. These results position DomiRank as a tunable complement to principal-eigenvector centrality, with distinctive behavior under strong competition and new tools for node-importance evaluation. Because the parameterization by sigma is a structural property of the measure, not a guarantee of advantage on a downstream task, we also relate these results to the companion null-model study of how much of DomiRank's task-level edge over a degree baseline survives an explicit degree correction.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

A General Capacity Frontier of Complex Networks

From cells to cities, ecosystems to economies, complex networks exhibit peak intensities that define their empirical limit. Estimating these limits traditionally requires domain-specific knowledge. We demonstrate that a wide range of complex networks share a capacity frontier that constrains these maxima. We formalize this regularity by proposing Structural Capacity Theory for Network Substrate Structured Systems. These systems couple a fixed network substrate with an observable dynamical process. The frontier is learned from a vector representation of the network substrate and modulated log-additively by a vector representation of the dynamical process. Frontiers trained on one set of domains reliably bound empirical maxima of entirely different ones without observing their peak intensities or simulating their dynamics. Independent learning paradigms converge on consistent upper bounds. Frontier performance is stable under perturbation, yet degrades under deliberate falsification, with no performance gain under ablation. These findings support the capacity frontier as a generalizable constraint that describes how network structure bounds dynamical processes across otherwise unrelated systems.

cs.SI↗