arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1202.1071

The astrometric recognition of the solar Clementine gnomon (1702)

Abstract

The Clementine gnomon has been built in 1702 to measure the Earth's obliquity variation. For this reason the pinhole was located in the walls of Diocletian's times (305 a. D.) in order to remain stable along the centuries, but its original form and position have been modified. We used an astrometric method to recover the original position of the pinhole: reshaping the pinhole to a circle of 1.5 cm of diameter, the positions of the Northern and Southern limbs have been compared with the ephemerides. A sistematic shift of 4.5 mm Southward of the whole solar image shows that the original pinhole was 4.5 mm North of the actual position, as the images in the Bianchini's book (1703) suggest. The oval shape of the actual pinhole is also wrong. Using a circle the larger solar spots are clearly visible. Some reference stars of the catalogue of Philippe de la Hire (1702), used originally for measuring the ecliptic latitude of the Sun, are written next to the meridian line, but after the last restauration (2000), four of them are wrongly located. Finally the deviation from the true North, of the meridian line's azimuth confirms the value recovered in 1750. This, with the local deviations of a true line, will remain as systematic error, like for all these historical instruments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Costantino Sigismondi. 2012-02-06. The astrometric recognition of the solar Clementine gnomon (1702). https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194513011756

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph

Does DESI Provide Evidence for Dynamical Dark Energy?

Recent results from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) have suggested that dark energy, long considered to be a cosmological constant, may actually be \lq{}dynamical\rq{}. To clarify what follows from these results, we distinguish three claims: (D1) the data disfavour the \LCDM expansion history; (D2) within the phenomenological Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parametrisation, the data prefer $(w_0,w_a)\neq(-1,0)$; and (D3) there exist one or more genuine dynamical dark-energy degrees of freedom in the matter-sector, within GR and coupled to the standard sectors only gravitationally, whose dynamics account for the departure from the \LCDM expansion history. We demonstrate that DESI establishes D2, which supports D1, but does not establish D3. The \lq{}designer\rq{} construction in $f(R)$ gravity provides a gravitational realisation of the same background history, so that no observable determined solely by that history can discriminate, even in principle, between its \lq{}matter\rq{} and \lq{}gravitational\rq{} readings. Furthermore, non-minimally coupled models admit regular effective phantom-crossing realisations of the relevant phenomenology, while the selected crossing places additional pressure on a single-component, minimally coupled realisation of the matter-sector reading. We characterise the resulting underdetermination between matter and gravitational interpretations---exact at the level of background history, but breakable beyond it---and draw the corresponding norm for survey reporting.

physics.hist-ph

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph