arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1106.2334

On (Some) Explanations in Physics

James Owen Weatherall
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

I offer one possible explanation of why inertial and gravitational mass are equal in Newtonian gravitation. I then argue that this is an example of a kind of explanation that is not captured by standard philosophical accounts of scientific explanation. Moreover, this form of explanation is particularly important, at least in physics, because demands for this kind of explanation are used to motivate and shape research into the next generation of physical theories. I suggest that explanations of the sort I describe reveal something important about one way in which physical theories can be related diachronically.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-phphysics.class-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

James Owen Weatherall. 2011-06-12. On (Some) Explanations in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1086/660737

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Geometry of the "Gauge Argument"

We show how the "gauge argument", widely criticized by philosophers as ad hoc and unconvincing, may be reconstructed rigorously, and, we believe, convincingly, as an argument concerning the geometry of vector bundles. In this form, the gauge argument has two parts, the first of which is strongly analogous to the Weyl-Stein argument for Galilean spacetime as the appropriate setting for Newtonian gravitation; and the second of which invokes a classic result in the Yang-Mills theory literature, due to Utiyama [1956, "Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction", Phys. Rev. 101, 1597].

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Rethinking Symmetry Principles and Partial Observables With Reference Frames

Dynamically uncoupled fields are a modelling device used in the literature on reference frames, classical and quantum. We argue that the device is not innocuous. First, uncoupled fields violate Earman's symmetry principle SP1---that every dynamical symmetry is a spacetime symmetry---and the violation, unlike the familiar Newtonian one, cannot be repaired by excising surplus spacetime structure: it arises from a deficit of dynamical structure, not an excess of spatiotemporal structure. This qualifies implicit assumptions of Earman's SP1, while leaving its diagnostic role intact. Second, uncoupled fields expose a lacuna in the partial/complete observables programme: only dynamically coupled fields can serve as bona-fide partial observables, so partial observability is derivative on complete observability. We then reinterpret the standard formalism for partial observables: qua measurable, a partial observable is a relational quantity expressed with respect to an uncoupled frame, and it remains gauge-variant. This reinterpretation vindicates Rovelli's claim that partial observables are individually measurable, against Thiemann and Adlam, and separates two properties easily conflated in the generally covariant formulations of theories: invariance under diffeomorphisms and invariance along the gauge flow.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Becoming, Duration, and the Evolving Block Universe

The two-times problem asks how the directed, oriented time of biological and conscious systems relates to the time of fundamental physics. The Evolving Block Universe, in which spacetime grows through an irreversible quantum dynamics along physically preferred worldlines, accounts for the direction of physical time and for its emergence across scales up to the time kept by the brain. It leaves open the relation between this physical time and the experience of passage. We argue that Bergson's durée, the continuous qualitative experience of lived time, names this residue and marks the first-person level at which the physical hierarchy reaches its limit. On this reading the two accounts divide the problem between them: the Evolving Block Universe describes its structural, third-person half, and durée its experiential, first-person half. The remaining gap between the two halves is explanatory. It is an instance of the familiar gap between the physical description of a system and the character of its states as they are lived, and it is compatible with physicalism.

physics.hist-ph↗