arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0802.1366

Rise and fall of the old quantum theory

Manfred Bucher
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The old quantum theory of Bohr and Sommerfeld was abandonned for the wrong reason. Its contradictions were caused not by the orbit concept but by a mental barrier--the inconceivability that an electron might collide with the atomic nucleus. Removing that barrier resolves the theory's main failures--incorrect orbital momenta, He atom, H2+ molecule ion. The inclusion of electron oscillations through the nucleus--a concept called "Coulomb oscillator"--renders the old quantum theory consistent with quantum mechanics (although devoid of wave character). The triple success of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model is its correct description of the H atom (and one-electron ions) concerning (1) the energy levels Enl, (2) the orbital angular momenta Lnl--if corrected as Lnl^2 = l(l+1) hbar^2 and with the Coulomb oscillator included--and (3) the orbits' space quantization--with (Lnl)z = ml hbar. These achievements are succinctly represented by the principal, angular and magnetic quantum numbers (n, l, ml) and visualized by orbital ellipse geometry--major axis, vertex curvature, and tilt angle, respectively. Orbit geometry also accounts for the average orbit size. Moreover, the Coulomb oscillator provides a natural explanation of (isotropic) hyperfine interaction. The shortcomings of the old quantum theory lie in its neglect of three properties of particles--their spin, their wave nature and their quantum statistics. These deficiencies notwithstanding, the visual appeal of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model remains a pedagogical asset to complement the abstract character of quantum mechanics.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-phphysics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Manfred Bucher. 2008-02-11. Rise and fall of the old quantum theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1366

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Scientific Promise

Scientists constantly face decisions about what lines of research to pursue. This Element introduces the philosophical debate about scientific pursuitworthiness. It explains how it can be rational to pursue a theory even if the theory is less well supported than its rivals, and it discusses existing philosophical frameworks for guiding pursuit decisions. The Element also develops a new perspective. Existing accounts focus predominantly on theories, while experiments are largely neglected. This is an important shortcoming. Theoretical promise depends on experimental promise, and experimental promise raises questions of its own. Drawing on the epistemology of experimentation, the Element advances an account of experimental pursuitworthiness. It is argued that such pursuitworthiness depends on experimental virtues like a clear signal and simplicity of design. Moreover, the kinds of uncertainty that constrain the assessment of scientific pursuits are examined. Finally, the Element highlights open questions in the philosophy of scientific pursuitworthiness.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Is Black Hole Evaporation Prediction Friendly?

Manchak and Weatherall (2018) formulate the black hole information paradox as a failure of predictability in black hole evaporation spacetimes, diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I offer a strategy for resolving this paradox. I argue that failures of predictability in black hole evaporation are not well diagnosed by non-global hyperbolicity. I then consider two weakenings of global hyperbolicity: prediction and retrodiction friendliness, the failure of which could ground a new paradox. However, deidealized black hole evaporation models can be prediction and retrodiction friendly. Therefore, the information paradox cannot be based upon failures of global hyperbolicity, nor either retrodiction or prediction unfriendliness.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

The Crab Nebula progenitor: recovering the 1054 AD supernova event as galactic Gamma-ray burst

In 1054 AD a daytime star appeared in the constellation of Taurus, for three weeks, and it was reported in various sources from Europe to China/Japan: it was one of the few documented galactic supernovae of the last two millenia. This paradigm has been established about sixty years ago, as the comprehension of the physics of supernovae progressed with enough observational data. The Gamma-ray bursts were discovered in the same period, but only in the past few years have their observations become daily and their distances have been fully understood as cosmological. After the explosion, the exponential decay of the luminosity in gamma-rays and X-rays has been followed with telescopes onboard dedicated satellites. Also the exponential decay of the afterglow's optical and radio frequencies have been observed with the largest optical and radio telescopes. Within the binary-driven hypernova framework, successful in explaining all the observed phases of the Gamma-ray bursts, the universal exponential decay can be extended to 1000 years after the burst, to account for the present values of Gamma and X-rays as well as optical and radio frequencies of the Crab Nebula. Both the daytime visibility of the burst, and the simultaneous radiation plagues appeared in Constantinople and Cairo is a strong evidence of the presence of Gamma-rays in the lower atmosphere, coming from the same source originating the Crab nebula. The association to the daytime visibility of that star and the following plague meets exactly the etymology of the word dis-aster, bad star.

physics.hist-ph↗