arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0705.4266

El universo de Einstein: 1905 - annus mirabilis - 2005

Alejandro Gangui
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Year 2005 was the World Year of Physics, and it was commemorated worldwide as the 100th anniversary of Albert Einstein's legendary works in which the foundations of at least three areas of modern physics were laid: statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics and special relativity. These works turned year 1905 in what deservedly was called the "miraculous year" (annus mirabilis) of Einstein. However, the influence of this great mind was not limited to science. As it is well known, his fingerprint remains engraved in many aspects of our daily life. Because of that, in this work we have tried to cover almost all the subjects in which Einstein was involved during the last century and, of course, try and reveal the future projection his actions will have in this new century that has just begun. Among the subjects covered in the volume one can find the possible connection between Einstein and the artistic vanguard movement, his religiosity, his days in Argentina, the Nobel Prize, the Einstein-Freud correspondence, his pacifism and the nuclear energy, science and politics under the Second Empire and the Weimar Republic, and even a description of his patents and experiments, the studies performed to search for "built-in" features in his brain and the doubts many had regarding whether Einstein was a genius or a crank. Also included are essays on Einstein and Borges, philosophy and relativity, Mach's principle, the relation among science, arts and humanities, and, closer to Einstein's own theoretical research, the twin paradox, chance and quantum mechanics, the arrow of time, gravitational lenses, string theory, holography and black holes, gravitomagnetism, superconductivity, gravitational waves, the photoelectric effect and the alternative theories for gravitation.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-phastro-phhep-thphysics.pop-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alejandro Gangui. 2007-06-18. El universo de Einstein: 1905 - annus mirabilis - 2005. https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.4266

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On Algebraic Background-Independence

It has recently been claimed that algebraic methods can be used to give a background-independent description of semiclassical gravity. This paper aims to provide an entry point into recent algebraic approaches to quantum gravity and to analyse and critically assess the conception of background-independence here involved. We discuss an algebraic framework for formulating an algebra of observables along the worldline of an observer in a cosmological setting. By 'gravitationally dressing' the observables to the observer's worldline, the reference to the spacetime background can be set aside at the level of the abstract *-algebra. Thus this *-algebra is taken to be independent of any particular spacetime realisation, with different states on the algebra corresponding to different backgrounds. We compare this algebraic framework to three influential notions of background-independence in the literature and argue that none of these fully captures the sense in which the *-algebra is taken to be background-independent. Building on this, we extract a novel notion of algebraic background-independence tied to the representation-independence of the *-algebra. This algebraic conception motivates two further concepts of background-independence tailored to semiclassical theories: semiclassical background-independence and perturbative background-independence. We suggest that these provide useful tools for evaluating the scope and limitations of semiclassical approaches to quantum gravity.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Ghosts that Connect

What is a Faddeev--Popov ghost? The textbook answer is that it is a trick: a way of writing a functional determinant as a term in the action, and nothing more. Dougherty 2021 and Dougherty and Read 2026 have argued that this undersells the ghost, which on their account encodes classical structure of the configuration space, viz. the degree-one generators of the Chevalley--Eilenberg complex of the action Lie algebroid. I agree with them that the ghost encodes classical structure. But I think the structure is bigger than they say. The ghost, I argue, is a principal connection $\varpi$ on the bundle $F \to F/G$ of gauge potentials over physical configurations; the BRST operator is the exterior derivative along the orbits; and the Chevalley--Eilenberg ghost coincides with $\varpi$ restricted to the orbits (and every $\varpi$ has the same restriction). The restriction drops the horizontal complement, and I show that gauge-fixed quantisation needs that complement. A gauge-fixing installs it as a pairing of configurations across orbits (a counterpart relation, in Lewis's sense); dressed observables and local counterfactuals rely on this pairing, but it is discarded by the quotient $\F/\G$. In the non-Abelian case Singer's theorem forbids a flat $\varpi$, and there the pairing exists only as parallel transport. Finally, BRST survives gauge-fixing because it is vertical and rigid, and so leaves any such pairing unchanged.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Schrödinger's unpublished hidden-variable model in the 1944-45 debate over the "Collapse of Determinism"

In the mid-1940s, the question of whether quantum mechanics could be supplemented by deterministic hidden variables resurfaced in a debate in ^textit{Nature}. I show that Erwin Schrödinger drafted a hitherto unpublished response to this controversy. In it, Schrödinger provided an explicit hidden-variable model, thereby showing that such models could not be ruled out. I reconstruct the historical context of this forgotten manuscript and publish here the first transcription and analysis. Importantly, Schrödinger's proposal should be understood as a proof of principle rather than as evidence of his commitment to determinism.

physics.hist-ph↗