subject

econ.GN

econ.GN: explore 8 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

Measuring Computer Science Enthusiasm: A Questionnaire-Based Analysis of Age and Gender Effects on Students' Interest

This study examines how age and gender independently shape adolescents' interest in computer science (CS) education. Building on the Person-Object Theory of Interest (POI), we define enthusiasm as a short-term, activating response that combines positive affect, perceived relevance, and intention to re-engage. Because such enthusiasm can shift CS attitudes and engagement intentions even briefly, it offers a useful measure for short outreach activities. We developed a 28-item pre-post questionnaire to assess whether CS interventions raise enthusiasm, then applied it to more than 400 students (244 female, 187 male, aged 10-18) in CS courses. Contrary to the common assumption that early exposure secures lasting interest, we found a marked decline during early adolescence, especially among girls, along with wide variation in interest trajectories across ages. Exploratory factor analysis and ANOVA show that age predicts interest development more strongly than gender, and reveal specific developmental breakpoints. Although older students began with lower baseline attitudes, they showed the largest gains after the intervention, indicating that well-designed short activities can re-engage interest even later in adolescence. These results point to the need for CS education strategies that adapt to developmental stage rather than assuming a single early window matters most. Our validated questionnaire offers a way to measure immediate affective and motivational responses, giving researchers and practitioners a tool to evaluate whether specific interventions succeed in raising enthusiasm.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models

We conduct experiments with algorithmic pricing agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs). In oligopoly settings, LLM-based pricing agents quickly and autonomously reach supracompetitive prices and profits. Variation in seemingly innocuous phrases in LLM instructions ("prompts") substantially influence the degree of supracompetitive pricing. We develop novel techniques for behavioral analysis of LLMs and use them to uncover price-war concerns as a contributing factor. Our results extend to auction settings. Our findings uncover unique challenges to any future regulation of LLM-based pricing agents, and AI-based pricing agents more broadly.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Individualized Algorithmic Advice as a Strategic Signal on Competitive Markets

As algorithms increasingly mediate competitive decision-making, their influence extends beyond individual outcomes to shaping strategic market dynamics. In our experiment, we examined how algorithmic advice affects human behavior in a classic economic game with a unique, non-collusive, and analytically traceable equilibrium. Participants (N = 129) played a Cournot quantity competition with equilibrium-aligned or strategically biased algorithmic recommendations. While individualized equilibrium advice supported stable convergence, collusively downward-biased advice led to sustained underproduction and supracompetitive profits - hallmarks of tacit collusion. Participants' quantities converged faster and more consistently toward individualized than collective equilibrium advice, potentially due to an objective quality advantage or greater perceived ownership of the former. These findings demonstrate that algorithmic advice can function as a strategic signal, shaping coordination even without explicit communication. The results echo real-world concerns about algorithmic collusion and underscore the need for careful design and oversight of algorithmic decision-support systems in competitive environments.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Tastes without distinction: silicon samples and the synthetic construction of tastes

Large-language models have proven to be remarkable if inconsistent parrots of public attitudes and opinions. The extent to which LLMs are able to produce reasonable approximations of cultural taste remains an open empirical question that becomes more urgent by the day, with market research companies already offering provisional 'synthetic' survey panels and the contamination of standard survey data from LLM-generated responses. In this study, we build on past work on silicon sampling by extending considerations of their ecological, relational, and positional fidelity in the doomain of cultural tastes. We use large-language models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and DeepSeek to produce 554,940 silicon surrogates of survey respondents from the Survey of Public Participation in the Arts (SPPA). We find these silicon surrogates' tastes to be highly stylized facsimiles of human tastes. First, silicon samples are super-omnivorous with a systematic postive-bias for liking. These individual-level bias of silicon samples are not well-explained by the WEIRD-bias often discussed in the literature. Second, the complex relationality in real taste structures is completely distorted among silicon samples. Third, very little of the known cultural alignment between tastes and social space are preserved. Silicon samples juvenilize age-taste associations, resurrect anachronistic class-taste associations, and caricaturize gender- and race-taste associations. Key words: AI, taste, consumption, culture, silicon sampling, meta-analysis.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

The Price of Intelligence: A Quality-Adjusted Price Index for AI Services

Posted prices for AI inference have fallen steadily since 2024, yet the measured speed of that fall depends almost entirely on the method of measurement. This paper constructs quality-adjusted price indices for the AI inference market from public data. The panel assembles 21,024 posted-price observations across 3,208 models and 86 providers and joins them to 4,605 benchmark scores through a latent quality index estimated from benchmark response patterns, so the quality ladder of the hedonic tradition is built here from evaluations in place of product characteristics. Measured by the matched-model methods that statistical agencies apply to software, inference prices fell at 0.10 log points a year. The quality-adjusted index fell at 0.73, so 87% of the decline is invisible to current methods, with direct consequences for measured competition, concentration and productivity in this market. Counted per completed task, moreover, the buyer's price stopped falling. Reasoning models raised token consumption faster than token prices fell, and the seller's and buyer's prices accordingly diverged. A pre-registered validity audit disciplines the quality measure and yields the sharpest result. Excluding contamination-flagged benchmarks leaves model rankings intact at 0.998 yet moves the index by 0.49 log points a year, so the leaderboard-stability arguments standard in AI evaluation offer no defence of economic statistics built on benchmarks. Prices, quality and the audit are fully reproducible from public sources at zero cost.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Performance Manipulation: Labor Market Implications in AI-assisted Era

Performance manipulation arises when agents exploit easily measurable, routine tasks to inflate observable outcomes without contributing genuine innovation or expert judgment. We formalize this phenomenon in a game-theoretic model in which agents allocate effort along two margins. Creative effort is non-routine cognitive labor whose return is complementary to the agent's private expertise; it is the scarce input that principals seek. Mechanistic effort is the execution of well-defined, rule-based tasks that raise performance independently of expertise, a commoditized input that AI heavily augments. We establish the existence of a symmetric, monotone pure-strategy equilibrium and show that performance-based screening remains viable so long as evaluations retain a sufficient creative component, but collapses into an uninformative pooling equilibrium once AI capability grows large enough to crowd out creative effort. Comparing contest allocations against a single-agent baseline isolates performance manipulation as the competition-induced over-investment in mechanistic effort, which we show is undertaken systematically by low-type agents but not high-type ones. We further prove that more sharply skewed reward structures mitigate this friction by eliciting greater creative effort across the participant pool. Finally, using a novel, language-model-based methodology to measure both effort types from nearly 1,500 Kaggle competition scripts, we provide robust empirical support for the model's predictions.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Forecasting Weather-Driven Price Dynamics Across Sri Lankan Tea Market Catalogues

The Colombo Tea Auction (CTA) plays a vital role in determining global tea prices, yet the relationship between local weather conditions and price behavior across different tea catalogues has not been thoroughly explored. In this study, we develop a novel, structured dataset by extracting information from 105 weekly broker reports spanning late 2023 to 2026, and combined with region-specific weather data. Our analysis focuses on four main tea catalogues of Sri Lankan tea: High Grown, Low Grown, Off-Grade, and Dust. To better understand the factors influencing tea prices, we apply Granger causality analysis alongside tree-based machine learning models: Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Gradient Boosting. Our results show that while market dynamics are primary drivers, weather conditions also have significant effects. Notably, Low Grown tea shows strong sensitivity to precipitation and sunshine duration (p<0.05) across 1-3-week lags. Off-Grade and Dust catalogues also exhibit significant responses to temperature variations. Catalogue-specific modelling outperformed unified approaches, with LightGBM emerging as the superior model for three out of four catalogues. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering both localized weather patterns and catalogue-level differences when forecasting tea prices, offering a more precise and practical framework for the tea industry.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Digital Engagement, Income Disparities, and Job Seeking in the United States since 2010

Surveys often record how frequently people use the internet without measuring the infrastructures, skills, and support systems that make digital participation possible. Using the U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 cohort, we study how internet-use frequency relates to labor income, employment attachment, and job seeking after 2010. The main digital-engagement analysis uses the comparable 2011, 2013, and 2015 waves, with 2017 retained as later labor-market context. Across repeated cross sections, daily internet use consistently marks higher income and stronger employment attachment. Relative to daily use, less-than-daily use is associated with roughly 11 to 20 percent lower income, while nonuse is associated with about 18 to 21 percent lower income in 2011 and 2013. Respondents reporting no internet use are also 13 to 23 percentage points less likely to report full-year work. Job-search estimates reveal a distinct mechanism: active search is governed by employment status, search intensity, and application support, so a frequency item sorts respondents more sharply on durable labor-market attachment than on short-window search. Education accounts for a substantial share of the raw digital gradient, and pooled lagged-outcome and doubly robust transition estimates separate durable stratification from positive adoption margins. The results establish internet-use frequency as an informative behavioral marker of digitally mediated labor-market stratification and clarify why routine use should not be treated as a simple measure of digital access.

cs.CY↗

Compare source metadata on this page

Work	Published	Source identifier	Source
Measuring Computer Science Enthusiasm: A Questionnaire-Based Analysis of Age and Gender Effects on Students' Interest	2026-09-01	2512.08472	arxiv
Algorithmic Collusion by Large Language Models	2026-08-31	2404.00806	arxiv
Individualized Algorithmic Advice as a Strategic Signal on Competitive Markets	2026-08-31	2511.09454	arxiv
Tastes without distinction: silicon samples and the synthetic construction of tastes	2026-08-30	2606.30085	arxiv
The Price of Intelligence: A Quality-Adjusted Price Index for AI Services	2026-08-30	2608.29843	arxiv
Performance Manipulation: Labor Market Implications in AI-assisted Era	2026-08-29	2604.22230	arxiv
Forecasting Weather-Driven Price Dynamics Across Sri Lankan Tea Market Catalogues	2026-08-29	2608.24894	arxiv
Digital Engagement, Income Disparities, and Job Seeking in the United States since 2010	2026-08-27	2511.05294	arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.