subject

econ.EM

econ.EM: explore 9 source-linked works published from 2026 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

arXiv2026

Blockchain-Enabled Secure Logging for Fiscal Electronic Mechanisms: Evaluation of the Greek eSEND and myDATA Tax Systems

This paper analyzes the implementation of blockchain-based integrity mechanisms in Greek Fiscal Electronic Mechanisms (FEMs) and the central tax information system eSEND. The study examines the cryptographic architecture of fiscal devices, including Electronic Cash Registers, Fiscal Printers, Fiscal Signing Machines, and FEMAS devices, which implement double or triple hash-chain structures to ensure transaction immutability. The transmission protocol between fiscal devices and the central database is also evaluated with respect to encryption, sequential validation, and blockchain verification. In contrast, the architecture of Electronic Invoicing Provider Services and the myDATA central platform is analyzed, highlighting the absence of blockchain-based integrity guarantees. The comparison demonstrates that hardware-based fiscal mechanisms provide stronger guarantees for transaction completeness and tamper resistance than purely software-based invoicing infrastructures. The findings highlight architectural weaknesses in the current e-invoicing framework and propose improvements for ensuring transaction integrity in digital tax ecosystems.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

When the Scaffold Stays On: AI, Practice Style, and Screening in Elite Skill Formation

Generative AI raises short-term productivity by completing tasks learners would otherwise practice on their own. Whether this exchange erodes frontier skill depends on the mode of use: substitute-users let AI stand in for practice and fail to develop skills, while complement-users use AI to learn faster. The modes look alike in AI-aided output, so organizations screening on that output cannot tell them apart. We ask whether the AI-prohibited evaluation gates organizations already operate can separate the modes. In elite competitive programming, ICPC and IOI contests prohibit AI under in-person proctoring, with qualification-round entry, whereas Codeforces (CF) practice and contests are unproctored and open to all. From CF practice histories we build an AI-prompt signature consistent with AI usage, more first-attempt acceptances, fewer attempts and debugging retries. CF practice has shifted toward this signature across entry cohorts spanning two AI rollouts. On CF, a stronger signature predicts smaller rating gains for users with no ICPC-IOI affiliation, but not for those who qualified. Inside the AI-prohibited ICPC environment, AI-era entrants show no skill erosion, and shifts toward AI-style practice predict higher non-AI-aided scores. One screening mechanism fits both: where the modes mix, a stronger signature flags substitute-users; among those who qualified, a strengthening signature marks adoption of the complement mode. The message is constructive: AI-style practice is compatible with frontier skill; the erosion risk links to the substitute mode; and separating the modes is a design question for the exams organizations regularly administer, from medical and legal boards to professional certification.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Optimal Uniform Pricing for Multi-Interval Dispatch without Make-Whole Uplifts

In a network with ramp-limited generators and inaccurate net-demand forecasts, practical rolling-window dispatch can drive locational marginal prices (LMPs) below generators' bid-in offers. In such cases, out-of-market (OOM) settlements are used to compensate generators and maintain dispatch-following incentives, but OOM can have negative consequences, including nontransparent real-time price signals, discriminatory compensation, and incentives for untruthful bidding. This paper presents an optimal uniform pricing rule that minimizes demand payments, eliminates OOM make-whole payments, preserves LMP-based congestion charges, and ensures revenue adequacy. We derive the proposed pricing rule in closed form and relate it to existing pricing schemes. Numerical comparisons demonstrate favorable generator profits and reduced price volatility. However, higher generator profits are accompanied by increased demand payments, reflecting the in-market, uniform allocation of ramping costs while preserving the LMP-based congestion charges widely used in real-time market settlements. The numerical results also show that, under LMP with OOM settlement, a price-taking generator has an incentive to inflate its offer, whereas this incentive is absent under the proposed pricing rule within the tested bid range.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2026

Redefining Stablecoins from Nominal to Real Value: A Maximum Likelihood Approach

Stablecoins, typically pegged to fiat currencies, cannot achieve true stability because they inherit fluctuations in the underlying unit of account. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a stablecoin pegged to the Maximum Likelihood Value (MLV), a newly defined unit of account derived as the most probable configuration of latent real-value movements that explains observed nominal-value (price) changes. Grounded in inferential statistics and modern portfolio theory, MLV represents the most stable unit of account, as it enforces a zero real return on the minimum-variance portfolio. Empirical results confirm the operational viability of an MLV-pegged stablecoin: MLV can be computed in real time from 500 asset price series and improves annualized returns and Sharpe ratios while substantially reducing turnover in portfolio optimization.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2026

When Can We Work in Embedding Space? What Text Embeddings Preserve

When do text embeddings work as inputs to empirical analysis? Their use rests on an assumption: that we can trade text for its low-dimensional embedding, and lose little in doing so. I make that assumption precise under a generative model in which documents are mixtures of latent topics. I study two uses---clustering units in embedding space and controlling for high-dimensional text. A cluster of embeddings is a set of documents with similar topic mixtures; controlling for the embedding is equivalent to controlling for the topic mixture, so validity reduces to whether that mixture captures the confounding. In an application to 363 U.S. metropolitan areas, embedding-based clusters of LLM-generated economic descriptions recover interpretable economic archetypes and separate local employment dynamics more sharply than clustering on model residuals, or on a curated set of industry and demographic covariates.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Foundation models for electricity price forecasting and battery arbitrage: Can they replace market-specific forecasting models?

Foundation models promise accurate forecasts with little or no task-specific training, but whether they can replace models designed specifically for electricity price forecasting remains unclear. We compare nine variants from five foundation model families, evaluated in zero-shot mode, with two state-of-the-art electricity price forecasting benchmarks in Germany, Poland, and Spain over 2021-2025. Their performance is assessed in terms of point and probabilistic forecasting accuracy, as well as economic value in battery energy storage arbitrage. Only the TabPFN models consistently and significantly outperform the benchmarks across all three markets and all statistical measures. However, this statistical dominance does not translate directly into economic dominance: TabPFN performs best under unlimited bids and riskier quantile-based strategies, whereas the Distributional Deep Neural Network benchmark is more profitable when risk tolerance is lower. Thus, foundation models cannot universally replace market-specific models, and their value depends on both model architecture and the decision problem.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Content Exploration Beyond the Feed: Creator Supply and the Shared Corpus

Industrial recommenders give new content initial views through budgeted exploration, then use early performance to decide further delivery. On many short-video platforms, exploration is the primary way new videos reach viewers. Viewer-side tests measure consumption; the published budget objectives we review omit creator response. We analyze four experiments on a major short-video platform. An eight-month creator ablation finds production exploration raises videos posted per creator by 8.55% and creators posting at least once by 7.10% relative to a minimal floor. A budget-matched reallocation raises creator participation with no detectable short-run viewer-side change. A year-long viewer ablation finds 1.74% more video views but 2.13% less view time. A delivered view creates immediate feed value, can trigger organic take-up, and can induce creator supply. Take-up and supply replenish a shared corpus, creating two measurement limits. Viewer-side A/B tests cancel the corpus effect when both arms consume the same corpus. Giving each arm its own corpus avoids cancellation, but turnover still controls the horizon. If the corpus turns over at rate w per posting cycle, a t-cycle experiment expresses at most wt of the eventual corpus effect. More users reduce noise but do not speed turnover. Before the corpus path visibly bends, data cannot distinguish a modest fast effect from an arbitrarily large slow one, so a valid confidence interval may lack a finite upper endpoint. As predicted, the three-week co-diverted experiment cannot determine the sign of the eventual corpus effect. Within the window, it identifies the direct feed effect, and an exploratory cohort analysis detects organic lift after exploration ends. The experiments establish a positive creator response, measure the gross corpus flow visible within three weeks, and show the design and duration needed to identify total value.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

AI-Generated Measurements for Identification and Inference with Missing Data: A Weak Shadow Variable Approach

Across business and social science applications, outcomes are often missing in ways that depend on the unobserved outcomes themselves. In service systems, for example, whether a customer submits a rating depends on the rating they would have provided. Such missing-not-at-random (MNAR) mechanisms make population quantities difficult to identify without strong assumptions on the observation process. Meanwhile, rich unstructured data, such as customer interaction histories, are increasingly available and can be used to construct structured measurements using tools such as large language models (LLMs). In this work, we develop an assumption-lean partial identification framework that uses such measurements as weak shadow variables, defined as outcome-informative proxies that are conditionally independent of missingness given the true outcome and observed covariates. Importantly, they need not accurately predict missing outcomes or satisfy the completeness requirement in the classical shadow variable literature. For identification, we characterize sharp bounds on population quantities through a pair of linear programs. For estimation and inference, we propose a localized penalized estimator that remains feasible under sampling error, and a subsampling algorithm for constructing confidence intervals. In semi-synthetic experiments using real customer-service dialogues, weak-shadow-variable intervals are about 89\% narrower than those without auxiliary information, while their midpoints have around 41\% lower estimation error than classical MNAR methods.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Making

Treatment allocation under budget constraints is a central challenge in digital advertising. The standard approach trains an offline uplift model on historical data, then solves a constrained optimization to allocate budget. This fails in cold-start settings where little historical data exists. We propose Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits (BCCB), an online framework that learns which users respond to ads while simultaneously spending the budget. BCCB unifies three components: learning individual-level treatment effects, exploring users whose response is uncertain, and pacing the budget over time. We derive the per-arrival decision rule as the KKT condition of a Lagrangian relaxation of the budgeted causal-allocation objective, providing a principled foundation for the algorithm. We evaluate on the Criteo Uplift dataset using 20 random seeds with paired statistical tests. Our central finding is a data-efficiency crossover at n = 7,500 historical observations (paired one-sided t-test, p = 0.043): below this threshold, offline pipelines either fail or produce unreliable allocations, while BCCB operates from the first user. BCCB exhibits 2-4x lower run-to-run variance than offline methods and outperforms all four online baselines (Thompson Sampling, budgeted Thompson Sampling, HTE Greedy, and Uplifting Bandits) at every budget level tested (p < 0.001). These results give practitioners a concrete decision rule for choosing between offline and online paradigms.

cs.LG↗

Compare source metadata on this page

Work	Published	Source identifier	Source
Blockchain-Enabled Secure Logging for Fiscal Electronic Mechanisms: Evaluation of the Greek eSEND and myDATA Tax Systems	2026-09-03	2609.04356	arxiv
When the Scaffold Stays On: AI, Practice Style, and Screening in Elite Skill Formation	2026-09-02	2606.06253	arxiv
Optimal Uniform Pricing for Multi-Interval Dispatch without Make-Whole Uplifts	2026-09-01	2609.00541	arxiv
Redefining Stablecoins from Nominal to Real Value: A Maximum Likelihood Approach	2026-08-31	2608.30225	arxiv
When Can We Work in Embedding Space? What Text Embeddings Preserve	2026-08-31	2608.31059	arxiv
Foundation models for electricity price forecasting and battery arbitrage: Can they replace market-specific forecasting models?	2026-08-31	2609.00089	arxiv
Content Exploration Beyond the Feed: Creator Supply and the Shared Corpus	2026-08-29	2608.29430	arxiv
AI-Generated Measurements for Identification and Inference with Missing Data: A Weak Shadow Variable Approach	2026-08-28	2602.16061	arxiv
Budget-Constrained Causal Bandits: Bridging Uplift Modeling and Sequential Decision-Making	2026-08-28	2604.26169	arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.