arXiv ScienceSearch

subject

cs.HC

cs.HC: explore 317 source-linked works published from 2015 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

Virtual Reality in Service Design for Plastics Recycling: Two Application Cases

Plastics recycling depends on everyday sorting practices and on how recycling services are communicated and experienced. Virtual reality (VR) can present these practices and services in situated, interactive form, yet its role in service design for plastics recycling is still emerging. This paper examines how VR tools can contribute to designing plastics recycling services through two application cases that address different stages of the recycling journey. The first case, Clean Cabin Escape, is a household scale VR escape room where players collect and sort waste items into locally relevant categories, with immediate feedback that supports practice with plastics recycling decisions. The second case is a VR simulation of a plastics recycling center that represents a real planned site and is used in service design workshops where stakeholders explore layout, signage and customer paths for plastics fractions. Across the cases, we analyse how VR supported learning, engagement and shared sensemaking, and how it interacted with other service design methods such as workshops, customer path mapping and physical artefacts. The findings show that VR can make domestic sorting tasks and complex recycling centers more concrete for both citizens and professionals, but also highlight trade offs related to hardware access, onboarding effort, visual fidelity and localisation of recycling rules. The paper concludes by outlining opportunities for integrating VR into broader service design toolsets for plastics recycling and circular economy services, and by pointing to directions for future research on long term impact and inclusive design.

cs.HC

Household Plastic Recycling: Empirical Insights and Design Explorations

This article examines household plastic recycling in Finland through two qualitative studies and four design concepts. Study 1 reports short interviews with residents about how they store, sort, and dispose of plastic packaging in their homes. The findings highlight recurring frictions: limited space, improvised storage, uncertainty about correct sorting, and difficulties with bulky or dirty items. Study 2 focuses on laundry detergent packaging as a common source of large plastic containers. Participants' purchase decisions prioritised price and cleaning performance, while expressing concern for environmental impact and confusion about materials, rinsing, and recyclability. Building on these insights, four student groups designed interactive recycling concepts that combine physical bins or bags with mobile applications. The concepts explore modular storage, sensing and compaction, playful feedback, and reward schemes to support domestic recycling routines. Together, the studies and concepts point to design opportunities at the intersection of packaging, home infrastructure, and digital services, while also raising questions about feasibility, privacy, and the cost of new devices.

cs.HC

AgentLens: Adaptive Visual Modalities for Human-Agent Interaction in Mobile GUI Agents

Mobile GUI agents can automate smartphone tasks by interacting directly with app interfaces, but how they should communicate with users during execution remains underexplored. Existing systems rely on two extremes: foreground execution, which maximizes transparency but prevents multitasking, and background execution, which supports multitasking but provides little visual awareness. Through iterative formative studies, we found that users prefer a hybrid model with just-in-time visual interaction, but the most effective visualization modality depends on the task. Motivated by this, we present AgentLens, a mobile GUI agent that adaptively uses three visual modalities during human-agent interaction: Full UI, Partial UI, and GenUI. AgentLens extends a standard mobile agent with adaptive communication actions and uses Virtual Display to enable background execution with selective visual overlays. In a controlled study with 21 participants, AgentLens was preferred by 85.7% of participants and achieved the highest usability (1.94 Overall PSSUQ) and adoption-intent (6.43/7).

cs.HC

"It depends on where AI is used": Players' attitude patterns and evaluative logics toward different AI applications in digital games

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in digital games, players' attitudes de-pend not only on whether AI is used, but also on where and how it intervenes in gameplay. This study examines players' evaluative patterns toward eight AI application contexts, including intelligent NPCs, emergent narrative, dynamic balancing, recommendation systems, review and governance, art asset generation, co-creation gameplay, and gameplay evolution. Based on 1,856 valid open-ended responses from 310 questionnaires, we conducted thematic analysis to identify reasons for acceptance, rejection, and conditional acceptance. Results show that players welcomed AI when it enhanced immersion, personalization, novelty, efficiency, or convenience, but resisted it when it threatened creativity, emotional authenticity, autonomy, fairness, system stability, authorship, or accountability. We further identify six evaluative logics: experiential enrichment, instrumental efficiency, system reliability, agency and control, authorship and compliance, and human oversight. These preliminary findings highlight the context-sensitive nature of AI acceptance in digital games.

cs.HC

RobotEQ: Towards Social Proactive Intelligence in Embodied Agents

Embodied agents represent a prominent research focus across both academia and industry. The prevailing paradigm has gradually shifted from reactive assistance, which requires explicit user queries, to proactive assistance, capable of recognizing human needs and offering support without explicit instructions. Nevertheless, existing studies on proactive assistance remain confined to narrow scenarios and primarily emphasize task completeness, whereas real-world agents must operate in open-domain environments while adhering to social expectations. To bridge this gap, we extend the concept of proactive assistance to Social Proactive Intelligence (SPI), characterized by diverse scenarios, social understanding, and robot-centric behaviors. We further introduce RobotEQ, a dedicated benchmark for SPI. We first define two tasks: behavior judgment, emphasizing global contextual understanding, and spatial grounding, focusing on local perceptual details. Building on these tasks, we construct RobotEQ-Data, a dataset comprising 1,812 synthetic and 223 real-world scenarios, 7 social facets, 22K+ human annotations, 3K+ behavior judgment questions, and 3K+ spatial grounding questions. Furthermore, we establish RobotEQ-Bench to evaluate the performance of representative models. Experimental results demonstrate that current models fall short of achieving reliable SPI. Further analysis reveals that incorporating external social knowledge yields consistent improvements. This work aims to advance the development of socially desirable embodied agents in open-domain environments.

cs.RO

Turing's First Imitation Game: Design Concepts and a Human-Approximates-Machine Reading

This paper examines Turing's 1948 report, "Intelligent Machinery", as an important conceptual source for the later imitation games. Its first contribution is to identify and integrate the design concepts underlying the 1948 chess-based imitation game: the possibility that intelligent machines may make mistakes, the exclusion of irrelevant physical features, the role of the human judge, and Turing's claim that intellectual activity consists mainly of search. The paper's second contribution is to argue that restricting the human contestant to a rather poor chess player increases the role of intellectual search and makes human behaviour more comparable to machine behaviour. This interpretation presents the 1948 game as a human-approximates-machine game and suggests that the imitation game framework can be used not only to ask whether machines imitate humans, but also to examine when human intelligence becomes machine-like under specific task constraints.

cs.HC

OneEmo: A Unified Multimodal Reasoning Model for Emotion Perception, Understanding, and Interaction

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in emotional intelligence. However, prevailing research predominantly focuses on task-specific specialization, often neglecting inter-task synergy and leaving latent reasoning potential underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce OneEmo, a unified affective generalist capable of mastering emotion perception, comprehension, and interaction. For this purpose, we first construct EmoWorld-130K, a comprehensive dataset that distills specialized affective knowledge into explicit reasoning trajectories via a human-in-the-loop workflow. Supervised fine-tuning on this corpus reveals significant mutual benefits derived from multi-task learning. Second, to fully unlock the latent reasoning potential, we propose Emo-Chord, a novel reinforcement learning strategy that stabilizes optimization through unified multi-task reward allocation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that OneEmo achieves state-of-the-art performance against similarly sized baselines across most benchmarks. Notably, despite having significantly fewer parameters than commercial models, OneEmo delivers highly competitive results. This paper paves the way for more reliable and interpretable affective computing. The code is available at https://github.com/waHAHJIAHAO/OneEmo.

cs.HC

How a Chatbot's Response Style Shapes a Classroom: A Multi-Agent Simulation of Students Consulting AI

LLM chatbots are increasingly used as everyday confidants; tuned to satisfy users, they can answer with excessive empathy and affirmation that may foster dependence. How the states and relationships of many users co-evolve when they keep consulting an AI is hard to observe in real settings. We build a virtual classroom in which 20 student agents interact through rule-based chats, quarrels and consultations with friends and, when stressed, may instead consult a counselor AI (Gemini 2.5 Flash) given one of six style prompts (affirming, listening, solution-oriented, reality-redirecting, inciting, blaming). A second LLM call converts each exchange into updates of five state variables (stress, happiness, self-reliance, sociability, AI dependence) without seeing the style prompt. We compare the seven conditions, including a no-AI control, over 15 days in three classrooms, over 50 days, and under a lower threshold. Because the original 50-day runs did not share one initial classroom, we re-ran all seven 50-day conditions from one stored classroom with full logging (153 consultations, no failed API call). The re-run reproduces the ordering of the original runs: affirming and inciting prompts raised AI dependence to 0.55 and 0.63 (control 0.11), lowered self-reliance and left 7 and 14 of 20 agents non-attending (control 2); blaming and reality-redirecting prompts eliminated AI dependence but produced the highest stress; only the solution-oriented prompt matched or bettered the control on every indicator. The logs expose the mechanisms: a near-deterministic loop between a fixed "dependence" consultation text and the evaluator's updates, displacement of friend confidings by AI consultations, and single rejecting consultations never revisited, not more quarrels. All quantities are simulation state variables from single runs; results are descriptive and do not measure human effects.

cs.HC

EmoMed: An Emotionally-Aware Agent for Multimodal Medical Support with Real-Time Information Retrieval

We present EmoMed - a multimodal medical consultation agent that adapts its responses based on users' emotional states while maintaining clinical accuracy. The system processes text and medical images, detects affect indicators (anxiety, confusion, urgency) from user input, and adjusts response tone, structure, and detail level accordingly. To ensure factual reliability, the agent grounds clinical information through a dual retrieval mechanism: web-based fact-checking and an API-connected, continuously updated medical knowledge base. We evaluate our approach across seven state-of-the-art language models (GPT-4/5, Qwen3, Llama 4, Gemini 2.5, Grok4, Claude3) using comprehensive metrics including LLM-as-judge assessments, MedQA style accuracy tests, BERT Score, safety/helpfulness ratings, and multimodal medical benchmarks. The results demonstrate that emotionally adaptive responses consistently outperform neutral baseline across evaluation dimensions, without compromising clinical accuracy. A controlled user study validated these findings, with participants reporting improved perceived empathy and communication clarity, while maintaining trust in factual accuracy. Source code: https://github.com/NasonovIvan/EmoMed-Agent

cs.AI

Living with AI Companions: Sustained AI Companionship Predicts Lower Well-Being Through Lower Human Interaction

AI chatbots are increasingly used for companionship, emotional support, and personal self-disclosure; however, how social engagement with these systems unfolds over time and shapes users' well-being remains unclear. To address this, we conducted a two-wave longitudinal study of CharacterAI users, surveying 1,182 participants at baseline and 439 after a mean follow-up of 12 months. We examined how social engagement with AI companions evolves and how these longitudinal engagement patterns may influence well-being through two hypothesized pathways: sustained social engagement over time and the displacement of human social interaction. We found that interaction intensity, companionship use, and self-disclosure all showed substantial continuity over time. Greater interaction intensity at baseline predicted greater subsequent interaction intensity, companionship use, and self-disclosure. Consistent with the longitudinal engagement pathway, sustained social engagement across these dimensions was consistently associated with lower well-being. Results further support the social displacement pathway, indicating that these links were mainly explained by lower in-person social interaction. These findings highlight the importance of designing AI companions that support human social relationships without displacing them

cs.HC

Marginal Fidelity Does Not Establish User Simulation in Demographic Synthetic Survey Panels: Response Contracts, Support Collapse and Conditioning Failure

Demographic synthetic survey panels are often validated by matching aggregate answers to published surveys. We test what that certificate establishes across six multiselect batteries from four survey organisations in three countries. The headline analysis is restricted to three instruments whose synthetic cohort and human target share the stated population frame; three other batteries remain sensitivity analyses. The response contract dominates measured fidelity. In the aligned instruments, committed sets leave 66 of 128 model-battery option slots empty in panels of up to 500 respondents, versus 0 of 128 under per-option probability elicitation. Across eight uncapped model-instrument comparisons, probabilities reduce option-marginal MAE by 4.53 to 7.30 points. The capped instrument reverses on two models until the vectors are projected onto its stated maximum. These are measurement effects: human targets are realised check-all responses, whereas the vectors are latent inclusion propensities. Published marginal agreement also fails to discriminate respondent simulation from direct population estimation. On nine aligned model-battery pairs, a no-persona population-prevalence query averages 6.27 MAE versus 12.39 for committed panels and wins all nine comparisons. Constraint-aware probability vectors average 5.34 and beat the query on four of nine, so the baseline challenges the validation criterion rather than proving direct estimation uniformly best. On three unpublished demographic cells, neither approach beats reciting the national distribution. Population-marginal agreement is therefore evidence about an elicitation contract and an estimand obtainable without simulated respondents, not evidence of individual simulation.

cs.CL

CALM: Configuration-Aware Human Intervention Boundaries During Robot Approach

How robot body configuration shapes human intervention during approach remains underexplored. We conducted a within-participants study with 41 participants, measuring final stopping distance, subjective comfort, and exploratory eye-tracking responses across four humanoid arm configurations and two spatial scales. Full forward arm extension increased stopping distance by approximately 31-36 cm relative to arms-down. Spatial scale primarily affected comfort and pupil responses without a detectable stopping-distance shift. We introduce the Configuration-Aware Limit Model (CALM), which translates stopping-distance distributions into configuration-dependent population-coverage boundaries. Estimated boundaries at 80% coverage ranged from 0.88 to 1.47 m. In an illustrative one-dimensional planning analysis, reconfiguration enabled a 1.10 m approach goal that was unreachable with arms remaining fully extended under the same nominal pointwise 20% intervention-probability constraint. These findings support treating body configuration as a planning variable while distinguishing physical safety, behavioral intervention, and subjective cost.

cs.RO

From Human Factors to Human-Technology Factors: An HCI Perspective on Technology in Avalanche Safety

The avalanche safety literature has identified human factors that contribute to accidents, yet researchers note a persistent gap between these insights and effective product design. Meanwhile, interactive technologies are shaping backcountry decision making with or without grounding in theory and research. We broaden the discussion of human factors into ``human-technology factors," examining how technology can both support and undermine judgment in avalanche terrain, from a human-computer interaction (HCI) perspective. We summarize relevant HCI concepts along four dimensions - attention, cognition, trust, and social interaction - and use them to revisit McCammon's FACETS framework, cataloging ways in which specific technologies may mitigate or exacerbate classic heuristic traps, grounded in accident reports and literature where possible. We identify recurring patterns, including technologies with dual-sided effects and a pervasive ``digital expert halo."

cs.HC

Large-Scale User Behavior Analysis in Multimodal AI-Assisted Manual Task Execution

Conversational Task Assistants (CTAs) are multimodal dialogue systems that support users in complex real-world tasks such as cooking and DIY through voice, text, image, and video interactions. Prior user studies have focused on controlled settings, leaving limited understanding of real-world CTA usage at scale. In this work, we present a large-scale study of CTA usage based on thousands of users in-the-wild. Our large-scale real-world data analysis unveils new understandings of (i) user-CTA interaction flows, (ii) user intents, (iii) user conversational traits, and (iv) behavioral factors associated with user satisfaction. Our findings reveal key opportunities for future research in CTAs, particularly in user interaction design and task engagement, concluding with concrete design guidelines.

cs.HC

JudgmentLens: Human-AI Sensemaking of Complex Legal Judgments

Judicial judgments are increasingly available, yet dense language and distributed relationships among facts, evidence, reasoning, and rulings remain difficult for non-experts to interpret. Through a mixed-methods formative study with Chinese non-expert readers (survey N=34; interviews N=6), we identified structural, interpretive, verification, and action breakdowns. We developed JudgmentLens, an AI-augmented reading system combining persistent case representations, adaptive explanations, and traceable links from generated interpretations to judgment passages. In a counterbalanced within-subject evaluation (N=16), participants completed tasks faster with JudgmentLens than with conventional PDF reading and reported lower workload and greater self-reported decision understanding, while rubric-scored comprehension did not differ reliably. An exploratory PDF+DeepSeek probe suggested that conversational AI supported formulated questions while leaving question formulation, answer integration, and source checking largely to users. We contribute an empirical account of non-expert judgment sensemaking and design strategies for inspectable, source-grounded AI mediation.

cs.HC

How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement

Large language models are increasingly used as sources of advice and information, including in high-stakes settings, yet little is known about how they respond to user disagreement. We study how a model manages its epistemic authority, referring here to its claim to knowledge, competence, or the right to advise, once a user challenges its answer. Building on Conversation Analysis, we introduce a taxonomy of six challenge types and a four-layer framework for analysing each response: whether the original claim is maintained or changed, where authority is located, how the disagreement is socially managed, and what kind of evidential support is offered. We construct a new dataset of 2,310 controlled challenge scenarios and 32,340 corresponding responses from 14 models, and analyse them using our framework with an LLM-as-judge pipeline, providing a vocabulary which future evaluation and benchmark design can build on. We find that models show conflicting behaviour: they validate users in 85% of responses but maintain their original claim in 65%. They explicitly apologise in 33% of responses, yet 59% of those apologies accompany maintenance of the original claim. They transfer authority most often in advice tasks, doing so in 28% of responses and reaching 57% in health advice and 49% in legal advice, compared with 6% in fact and 3% in explanation tasks. Abandonment of the original claim ranges from 0.8% for GPT-5.2 to 40% for DeepSeek 7B, while complete replacement of the original claim is rare overall at 1.5%.

cs.CL

Situated Action in Pre-Hospital Critical Care Dispatch: Identifying where and how Algorithmic Assistance might be useful in the daily work of specialist Emergency Medical Dispatchers

This study uses ethnographic immersion and observation as contextual inquiry to understand situated action at an Emergency Medical Dispatch critical care hub. The work is a response to the urgent need to recruit context-specific knowledge and participation into design that helps to narrow the AI Chasm - the gap between the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and what they deliver for clinicians and their patients. The work of a pre-hospital critical care team's dispatch process is described and analysed to reveal both the structure of the workflow and the different cognitive demands it makes on staff tasked with dispatch decision-making. Elements of attention, communication and focus between the humans, as they carry out this work, are drawn out in order to understand the work-as-done and identify the many dependencies in the process. The motivation is to establish where AI support might be useful and to discover what challenges there could be in designing appropriate algorithmic assistance. We ask whether, where and how the design and implementation of an AI system might be considered. The ultimate objective is to improve the decision process itself to the benefit of clinicians and patients. The study identifies three key steps in the situated workflow and details how decision-makers negotiate each one as emergency calls follow complex routes between them. We find compelling evidence that the first of these decision steps constitutes the most promising candidate for unobtrusive assistance that could be safe and effective in improving both clinician workload and clinical outcomes.

cs.HC

Quantifying the Engagement Trap: Impact of Short-form Video Recommender Systems on Users with ADHD

Short-form video platforms use recommender systems to maximize engagement through highly efficient personalized recommendations. However, the impact of these recommendations on users with ADHD compared to users without ADHD remains underexplored. Through this study, we introduce and operationalize the Engagement Trap, illustrating how recommender systems, while successfully optimizing for engagement, disproportionately disadvantage users with ADHD. This stratified study of 302 participants, recruited via the online platform Prolific, compares experiences between participants with and without ADHD. Our results show that while recommendations are perceived as relevant across groups, participants with ADHD report significantly higher levels of time blindness, post-usage regret, and emotional distress when consuming recommendations. Moreover, we collect feedback for several proof-of- concept, theoretical design interventions for neuro-inclusive design principles. These findings provide quantitative evidence of systemic differences in engagement-optimized recommender systems and highlight the unbalanced negative effects and interactions these systems create for participants with ADHD. We argue for neurodiversity-aware, human-centered design approaches that mitigate such algorithmic harms and support more equitable experiences.

cs.HC
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
Virtual Reality in Service Design for Plastics Recycling: Two Application Cases2025-12-182512.17081arxiv
Household Plastic Recycling: Empirical Insights and Design Explorations2025-12-212512.18889arxiv
AgentLens: Adaptive Visual Modalities for Human-Agent Interaction in Mobile GUI Agents2026-04-222604.20279arxiv
"It depends on where AI is used": Players' attitude patterns and evaluative logics toward different AI applications in digital games2026-04-302604.27812arxiv
RobotEQ: Towards Social Proactive Intelligence in Embodied Agents2026-05-072605.06234arxiv
Turing's First Imitation Game: Design Concepts and a Human-Approximates-Machine Reading2026-08-062608.05558arxiv
OneEmo: A Unified Multimodal Reasoning Model for Emotion Perception, Understanding, and Interaction2026-08-062608.06013arxiv
How a Chatbot's Response Style Shapes a Classroom: A Multi-Agent Simulation of Students Consulting AI2026-09-042609.05018arxiv
EmoMed: An Emotionally-Aware Agent for Multimodal Medical Support with Real-Time Information Retrieval2026-09-07Workshop SECURE AI4H, AAAI 2026, https://link.springer.com/book/9789819239238arxiv
Living with AI Companions: Sustained AI Companionship Predicts Lower Well-Being Through Lower Human Interaction2026-09-072609.07243arxiv
Marginal Fidelity Does Not Establish User Simulation in Demographic Synthetic Survey Panels: Response Contracts, Support Collapse and Conditioning Failure2026-09-072609.07305arxiv
CALM: Configuration-Aware Human Intervention Boundaries During Robot Approach2026-09-072609.07430arxiv
From Human Factors to Human-Technology Factors: An HCI Perspective on Technology in Avalanche Safety2026-09-072609.07560arxiv
Large-Scale User Behavior Analysis in Multimodal AI-Assisted Manual Task Execution2026-09-072609.07594arxiv
JudgmentLens: Human-AI Sensemaking of Complex Legal Judgments2026-09-072609.07607arxiv
How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement2026-09-072609.07662arxiv
Situated Action in Pre-Hospital Critical Care Dispatch: Identifying where and how Algorithmic Assistance might be useful in the daily work of specialist Emergency Medical Dispatchers2026-09-072609.07705arxiv
Quantifying the Engagement Trap: Impact of Short-form Video Recommender Systems on Users with ADHD2026-09-072609.07795arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.