arXiv ScienceSearch

subject

cs.DM

cs.DM: explore 83 source-linked works published from 2019 to 2026, with original documents and citations.

This collection is a preview while coverage and quality are evaluated.

Search within this collection

Coverage and selection

Includes records with this source-supplied label or an explicit phrase match in their metadata. Matches indicate a mention, not proof that a paper uses a method or tests a material. Source versions are consolidated by DOI.

Sources: arxiv. Collection updated 2026-09-15. Counts describe this index, not the complete source archives.

New Upper bounds on the Mondrian Art Problem

We present a new upper bound on the defect of the Mondrian Art Problem. The Mondrian Art Problem asks for a partition of an $n \times n$ square with rectangles of distinct dimensions such that the difference (defect) between the largest and smallest rectangle areas is minimized. We prove that for any $n \times n$ square, there exists a partition with defect $O(n^{5/6})$, improving upon the previously conjectured $O (n/\log n)$ upper bound. We also implement an algorithm that provides empirical evidence supporting our theoretical bound.

math.CO

Characterizations and Complexity of Minimum Forward and Integer Cycle Bases

The cycle space of a directed graph is generated by a cycle basis, where, in general, cycles are allowed to have both forward and backward arcs. In a forward cycle, all arcs must follow the given direction. Several open questions remain regarding the complexity of the minimum cycle basis problem, in particular the minimum-weight integral cycle basis problem, and the minimum-weight weakly and strictly fundamental forward cycle basis problems. In this paper, we address these open questions. First, we study the existence, structure, and computational complexity of minimum-weight forward cycle bases. We give a complete structural characterization of digraphs that admit weakly fundamental (and hence integral) forward cycle bases. We further provide a characterization when a strongly connected digraph admits a forward fundamental cycle basis, proving that such a basis exists if and only if the set of directed cycles has cardinality equal to the cycle rank; in this case, the basis is unique. Lastly, we show that while minimum-weight forward fundamental cycle bases can be found in polynomial time whenever they exist, the minimum-weight forward weakly fundamental cycle basis problem is APX-hard via an L-reduction from the minimum-weight weakly fundamental cycle basis problem on digraphs with metric weights. Second, we introduce opt-in graphs, i.e., the family of graphs for which minimum cycle bases are integral for any weight function. We show that this family is minor-closed and hence, by the Robertson-Seymour theorem, is characterized by a finite set of forbidden minors, so that the opt-in recognition problem is solvable in polynomial time. Lastly, we present an algorithm to check whether a graph is opt-in, and if not, to identify which of its minors belong to the set of forbidden minors. Applying this algorithm, we show that the complete graph $K_n$ is opt-in if and only if $n \leq 7$.

math.OC

The Class Edge-Reconstruction Number of a Maximal Planar Graph Is One or Two

An edge card of a graph is obtained by deleting one edge, and a class edge-reconstruction number asks for the fewest carefully selected cards that identify the graph when its class is known. We determine the sharp universal bound for maximal planar graphs. Two selected cards always suffice, and the octahedral graph shows that two can be necessary; some maximal planar graphs are already identified by one card. The argument exploits the fact that deleting a flippable edge leaves a single quadrilateral whose two diagonals give the only possible maximal-planar completions. Degree information then rules out the competing completion, with a separate argument for graphs containing a vertex of degree three. This settles a problem posed in a 2010 survey on reconstruction numbers.

math.CO

Extremal Asymmetric Depth of Planar Graphs and Hidden Near-Mirror Symmetries of IPR Fullerenes

Although almost all graphs are asymmetric -- having no nontrivial global automorphisms -- they may still possess local symmetries in the form of isomorphisms between induced subgraphs, i.e., partial automorphisms. We study such local symmetries via asymmetric depth, defined in terms of the maximum rank of a nontrivial partial automorphism. We prove a tight upper bound on asymmetric depth in the class of planar graphs and identify the extremal graphs: duals of IPR fullerenes attain the maximum already on $47$ vertices. Our main structural result concerns the IPR fullerenes that are neither maximally asymmetric nor symmetric. In such a cage no purely local action realises a low asymmetric depth, and we show that the map which does realise it cannot be confined to a small part of the cage either: neither to a single face, nor behind an interface of at most $5-k$ edges, $k \le 3$ being the deficiency. A cage of asymmetric depth $2$ or $3$ is therefore not asymmetric in one place; it carries a broken symmetry invisible to its automorphism group. Such cages are rare -- under $2\%$ of the asymmetric IPR fullerenes at $n = 118$. In all $727$ of them the largest partial automorphism is a near-mirror reflection, which we state as an explicit conjecture. We also extend the asymmetric depth bound to graphs of higher genus.

math.CO

frb100-40 After Two Decades: An Optimality Certificate and a Preregistered Search Study

For more than 20 years, the Model-RB benchmark frb100-40 remained an open challenge; since 2014, its public record had stood at 99 of 100 variables. We give a directly checkable 100-vertex independent set for its 4,000-vertex graph. Together with a verified partition into 100 cliques of size 40, the witness proves that the maximum independent-set size is 100 and the minimum vertex-cover size is 3,900. The stochastic run that found the witness is kept separate from this proof. We evaluated its added pair and triple repair operators in a preregistered campaign comprising 8,668 valid runs. The primary comparison found no detectable acceleration over base ULSA (hazard ratio 0.967, 95% confidence interval 0.915-1.023; p=0.248), and the factorial ablation reached the same conclusion. On a smaller FRB suite, the group-aware CSP pipeline solved 2,500/2,500 runs, compared with 2,391/2,500 for LibMVC-NuMVC. On frb100-40, full ULSA, base ULSA, and NuMVC each produced 0/56 new certificates. With no events, the planned cross-solver hazard ratios remain unidentified. NuMVC ended with cover size 3,902 in 40 runs and 3,903 in 16. Exhaustive enumeration showed that none of the 108 unique recorded conflict-two states had a strictly improving group-aware CSP neighbor within Hamming radius three. The certificate settles the instance. The experiments characterize the search barrier, and the preregistered comparisons show no heuristic advantage.

cs.DM

Almost Linear 3-Spanners of Temporal Cliques

Temporal graphs model dynamic networks by assigning positive integer time labels to the edges, while information propagates along temporal paths, whose edge labels are traversed in nondecreasing order. A temporal $α$-spanner of a temporal graph with $n$ vertices is a temporal subgraph that approximates the minimum-hop temporal distance between every pair of vertices within a factor of $α$. While general temporal graphs may not admit sparse temporal $α$-spanners for any value of $α$, temporal cliques are known to admit temporal $(2k-1)$-spanners of size $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(kn^{1+1/k})$ for every positive integer $k$. We present a simple recursive algorithm that computes, for every temporal clique on $n$ vertices, a temporal $3$-spanner of size $n^{1+2/\sqrt{\ln n}}=n^{1+o(1)}$, thereby improving the previous best upper bound of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{3/2})$. We also show that a modified version of our algorithm computes temporal $3$-spanners of size $\mathcal{O}(nL)$ when the lifetime is bounded by $L$, i.e., all time labels are in $\{1,\ldots,L\}$, thus improving the previous bound of $\mathcal{O}(2^Ln\log n)$. Both results are particularly striking in light of the known lower bound of $Ω(n^2)$ on the size of temporal $2$-spanners, which already holds for temporal cliques of lifetime $L\geq 3$. Both algorithms rely on a new simple recursive decomposition that certifies temporal connectivity for a large collection of source-target pairs using only $\mathcal{O}(n)$ carefully selected edges and recursively processes only the remaining pairs. Besides yielding substantially improved upper bounds, this approach is significantly simpler than previous constructions.

cs.DS

The Most Malicious Maître D'

We revisit the family of "napkin problems" first discussed by Peter Winkler in his 2004 puzzle book and discussed subsequently in several papers. This family of problems involves diners being seated around a circular table in which napkins are placed between the seats, so it is ambiguous which napkin belongs to which seat. The problems seek to quantify the proportion of diners who end up with no napkin under a variety of assumptions, one of which is that the diners have an adaptive adversary known as "the malicious maitre d'," who seeks to maximize the number of napkinless diners. Winkler's original strategy for the adaptive maitre d' was shown to be suboptimal in 2023 when Acton, Petersen, Shirman, and Toal presented a better (yet also suboptimal) strategy. In this paper we demonstrate an optimal strategy for the malicious maitre d' and compute the expected proportion of napkinless diners as a function of the probability of a diner taking the left napkin. Interestingly, the strategy does not depend on the exact probability; rather, it only depends on which napkin (left or right) the diners tend to prefer.

math.CO

Eleven, twelve, and thirteen lonely runners

Wills conjectured that, for any non-zero integers $u_1,\ldots,u_k$, there is a real number $t$ such that, for all $i=1,\ldots,k$, \[\lVert tu_i\rVert\geq\frac{1}{k+1},\] where $\lVert x\rVert$ is the distance from $x$ to the closest integer. This statement is known as the Lonely Runner Conjecture. A computational method developed by Rosenfeld and the second author verified the conjecture for $k\leq9$. We further refine this method with new sieving techniques and employ a polynomial method argument to show that any $(u_1,\ldots,u_k)\equiv(1,2,\ldots,k)\pmod{p}$ with $\gcd(u_1,\ldots,u_k)=1$ satisfies the conjecture when $k+1$ and $p > k^2+k$ are both odd primes. Ultimately, we provide a computer-assisted proof of the Lonely Runner Conjecture for $k\in\{10,11,12\}$.

math.CO

Logarithmic Chowla Correlations Across All Shift Scales

Let $λ(n)=(-1)^{Ω(n)}$ be the Liouville function. We prove a fixed power-logarithmic bound for its logarithmically weighted two-point correlations across the full shift range. There is an absolute $c>0$ such that every sufficiently large $x$ admits a single set $\mathcal E_x\subseteq[1,x]$ with $|\mathcal E_x\cap[1,H]|\ll_A H(\log x)^{-A}$ $(1\le H\le x)$ for every fixed $A>0$, while $\max_{\substack{1\le h\le x\ h\notin\mathcal E_x}}\sup_{1\le y\le x}\left|\sum_{n\le y}\frac{λ(n)λ(n+h)}{n}\right|\ll(\log x)^{1-c}$. The same exceptional-set formulation extends, without an upper cutoff, to all positive integer shifts. Earlier full-range theorems average over the shift; here a fixed saving holds pointwise outside one set whose density in every initial segment is smaller than every fixed negative power of $\log x$. The new middle-scale argument combines a general-good-modulus Liouville deletion lemma with a linear bad-modulus score, a progression Fourier estimate, and a Mellin-localized dilation that separates divisor-dependent endpoints. Maximal fixed-moment bounds evacuate the low prefix and control the long-shift range. Assuming GRH for primitive Dirichlet $L$-functions, we also prove, uniformly for $h\in\mathbb N$ and $1\le y\le x$, $\left|\sum_{n\le y}\frac{λ(n)λ(n+h)}{n}\right|\le\log(2\min{h,y})+O((\log x)^{1-c_{\mathrm G}})$ for an absolute $c_{\mathrm G}>0$, with no exceptional shifts.

math.NT

A Counterexample to Teschner's Bondage-Number Conjecture

For a finite simple graph $G$ with at least one edge, the bondage number $b(G)$ is the least number of edges whose deletion increases the domination number $γ(G)$. Teschner conjectured that $b(G)\le \tfrac32Δ(G)$ for every graph $G$. We disprove this conjecture by giving a connected cubic bipartite graph on eighteen vertices with \[ γ(G)=6 \qquad\text{and}\qquad b(G)=5. \] The domination number is established by a complete counting argument across the bipartition. An explicit five-edge deletion raises the domination number from six to seven. For the matching lower bound, we give an exact finite certificate: the graph has 297 minimum dominating sets, and deleting any one of its $\binom{27}{4}=17{,}550$ four-edge subsets leaves at least one of those sets dominating. The enumeration is deterministic, uses only exact integer and set operations, and is reproduced by the complete standard-library verifier included in the appendix.

math.CO

Probabilistic Methods on Erdos Problems

Probability distributions and the rules of inclusion-exclusion apply to derive general results about graph theory and number theory. In order to apply the rules of inclusion-exclusion in the setting some of these problems require, it is necessary to use specific equations and make several assumptions about integration and measure of the probability distributions.

cs.DM

Recognizing Graphs Close to Bipartite Graphs with an Application to Colouring Reconfiguration

We continue research into a well-studied family of problems that ask whether the vertices of a graph can be partitioned into sets $A$ and~$B$, where $A$ is an independent set and $B$ induces a graph from some specified graph class ${\cal G}$. We let ${\cal G}$ be the class of $k$-degenerate graphs. This problem is known to be polynomial-time solvable if $k=0$ (bipartite graphs) and NP-complete if $k=1$ (near-bipartite graphs) even for graphs of maximum degree $4$. Yang and Yuan [DM, 2006] showed that the $k=1$ case is polynomial-time solvable for graphs of maximum degree $3$. This also follows from a result of Catlin and Lai [DM, 1995]. We consider graphs of maximum degree $k+2$ on $n$ vertices. We show how to find $A$ and $B$ in $O(n)$ time for $k=1$, and in $O(n^2)$ time for $k\geq 2$. Together, these results provide an algorithmic version of a result of Catlin [JCTB, 1979] and also provide an algorithmic version of a generalization of Brook's Theorem, which was proven in a more general way by Borodin, Kostochka and Toft [DM, 2000] and Matamala [JGT, 2007]. Moreover, the two results enable us to complete the complexity classification of an open problem of Feghali et al. [JGT, 2016]: finding a path in the vertex colouring reconfiguration graph between two given $\ell$-colourings of a graph of maximum degree $k$.

cs.DS

On the Equivalence of the Graph-Structural and Optimization-Based Characterizations of Popular Matchings

Popular matchings provide a model of matching under preferences in which a solution corresponds to a Condorcet winner in voting systems. In a bipartite graph in which the vertices have preferences over their neighbours, a matching is defined to be popular if it does not lose in a majority vote against any matching. In this paper, we study the following three primary problems: only the vertices on one side have preferences; a generalization of this problem allowing ties in the preferences; and the vertices on both sides have preferences. A principal issue in the algorithmic aspects of popular matchings is how to determine the popularity of a matching, because it requires exponential time if the definition is simply applied. In the literature, we have the following two types of characterizations: a graph-structural characterization; and an optimization-based characterization described by maximum-weight matchings. The graph-structural characterizations are specifically designed for each problem and provide a combinatorial structure of the popular matchings. The optimization-based characterizations work in the same manner for all problems, while they do not reveal the structure of the popular matchings. A main contribution of this paper is to provide a direct connection of the above two types of characterizations for all of the three problems. Specifically, we prove that each characterization can be derived from the other, without relying on the fact that they characterize popular matchings. Our proofs offer a comprehensive understanding of the equivalence of the two types of characterizations, and suggest a new interpretation of the graph-structural characterization in terms of the dual optimal solution for the maximum-weight matching problem.

cs.GT

On the Extension Theorem for Packing Steiner Forests

We consider the problem of packing edge-disjoint Steiner forests in a graph. The input consists of a multi-graph $G=(V,E)$ and a collection of $t$ vertex subsets $S = \{S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_t\}$. A Steiner forest for $S$, also called an $S$-forest, is a forest of $G$ in which each $S_i$ is connected. In the case where $t=1$, this is the Steiner Tree packing problem. Kriesell's conjecture postulates that $2k$-edge-connectivity of $S_1$ is sufficient to find $k$ edge-disjoint $S_1$-trees. Lau showed that $24k$-edge-connectivity suffices for the Steiner Tree packing problem, which was improved to $6.5k$ by West and Wu and $5k+4$ by Devos, McDonald and Pivotto. In his thesis, Lau asserts that for the Steiner Forest problem, if each $S_i$ is $30k$-edge-connected in $G$, then there exist $k$ edge-disjoint $S$-forests. However, Lau's proof relies on an intermediate theorem called the Extension Theorem, which in this paper we will demonstrate has a gap by providing a counterexample to Lau's Extension Theorem. Furthermore, we will resolve this gap by correcting Lau's proof to show that $32k$-edge-connectivity of each $S_i$ suffices to pack $k$ $S$-forests. More careful analysis yields that $31k$-edge-connectivity of each $S_i$ is sufficient when $k \geq 8$.

cs.DM

Refutation of the Non-Cancelling Intersections Conjecture

The Non-Cancelling Intersections (NCI) conjecture of Amarilli, Monet and Suciu [arXiv:2401.16210] states that the union of a finite family of sets can always be built from its algebraically non-cancelling intersections using only disjoint unions and subset complements. In Wilhelm [arXiv:2608.19414] the conjecture was shown to fail when the witnessing dot-algebra expression is required to be left-linear. Here we remove that restriction and show that the conjecture is false in general: there is a finite lattice admitting no dot-algebra representation of its top element whatsoever. The counterexample is a lattice $P_{p,\mathfrak{m}}$ as in Wilhelm [arXiv:2608.19414], and the argument differs in only two ways. First, we replace the sequential "toggle game" of Wilhelm [arXiv:2608.19414] by a corresponding tree-shaped object, the plane tree, which stands to dot-algebra trees as the toggle game stands to left-linear ones. Second, we use a marked plane in which there is no admissible set of any size between $2p$ and $4p$, which also removes the need for the Erdős--Beck theorem and for the arithmetic Nullstellensatz. Consequently $p$ need not be astronomically large: every prime $p \ge 10^{5}$ works.

math.CO

An Improved Bound for Smith's Longest Cycles Conjecture via a Forbidden Subdivision

Smith's conjecture asserts that in every $k$-connected graph with $k\geq 2$, any two longest cycles intersect in at least $k$ vertices. In this work, we establish an $Ω(k^{8/11})$ bound for this conjecture, improving upon the $Ω(k^{2/3})$ bound of Ma and Zhao. Our proof combines a Ramsey theoretic refinement of the traditional Turán-type approach with computer search.

math.CO

Unary Functions, Automorphisms, and Unlabeled First-Order Model Counting

Every fixed first-order sentence $φ$ determines an enumerative sequence $n\mapsto\mathrm{FOMC}(φ,n)$, counting its models on the labeled domain $[n]$. We study the complexity of these sequences when logical specifications may use genuine unary function symbols and hence nested terms $x,f(x),f^2(x),\ldots$. We first prove that, for every fixed sentence $φ\in\mathrm{C}^1_{=}[f]$, with one unary function and an arbitrary finite relational vocabulary, $\mathrm{FOMC}(φ,n)$ is computable in time polynomial in $n$. By contrast, permitting either a second variable or a second unary function already yields hardness. Without counting quantifiers, there is a fixed sentence in $\mathrm{FO}^2_{=}[f]$ whose model-counting function is $\#\mathrm{P}_1$-complete. With one variable and two unary functions, there is a fixed constant-free universal sentence in $\mathrm{FO}^1_{=}[f,g]$, using only unary predicates besides $f$ and $g$, whose model-counting function is again $\#\mathrm{P}_1$-complete. We also relate labeled and unlabeled enumeration exactly. For every relational sentence $φ$, we construct an extension $φ_{\mathrm{aut}}$ in which a unary function records an automorphism and $\mathrm{FOMC}(φ_{\mathrm{aut}},n)=n!\cdot\mathrm{UFOMC}(φ,n)$, where $\mathrm{UFOMC}(φ,n)$ denotes the number of $n$-element models of $φ$ up to isomorphism. Thus automorphism marking gives a one-query exact reduction from unlabeled to labeled model counting at the same domain size. Over relational vocabularies of maximum arity at most $k$, where $k\geq2$, eliminating the auxiliary function yields single-query reductions from unlabeled $\mathrm{FO}^k_{=}$ and $\mathrm{C}^k$ model counting to labeled $\mathrm{FO}^{k+1}_{=}$ and $\mathrm{C}^{k+1}$ model counting, respectively.

cs.LO
Compare source metadata on this page
WorkPublishedSource identifierSource
New Upper bounds on the Mondrian Art Problem2026-09-022609.01998arxiv
Characterizations and Complexity of Minimum Forward and Integer Cycle Bases2026-09-022609.02317arxiv
The Class Edge-Reconstruction Number of a Maximal Planar Graph Is One or Two2026-09-022609.02389arxiv
Extremal Asymmetric Depth of Planar Graphs and Hidden Near-Mirror Symmetries of IPR Fullerenes2026-09-022609.02585arxiv
frb100-40 After Two Decades: An Optimality Certificate and a Preregistered Search Study2026-09-022609.02804arxiv
Almost Linear 3-Spanners of Temporal Cliques2026-09-022609.02851arxiv
The Most Malicious Maître D'2026-09-012407.09000arxiv
Eleven, twelve, and thirteen lonely runners2026-09-012604.23906arxiv
Logarithmic Chowla Correlations Across All Shift Scales2026-09-012608.23500arxiv
A Counterexample to Teschner's Bondage-Number Conjecture2026-09-012609.04257arxiv
Probabilistic Methods on Erdos Problems2026-08-311107.3279arxiv
Recognizing Graphs Close to Bipartite Graphs with an Application to Colouring Reconfiguration2026-08-311707.09817arxiv
On the Equivalence of the Graph-Structural and Optimization-Based Characterizations of Popular Matchings2026-08-312508.00349arxiv
On the Extension Theorem for Packing Steiner Forests2026-08-312603.16956arxiv
New Records for the Hadamard Maximal Determinant Problem in Dimensions $51$, $107$, $111$, $115$, and $119$2026-08-312608.22518arxiv
Refutation of the Non-Cancelling Intersections Conjecture2026-08-312608.27416arxiv
An Improved Bound for Smith's Longest Cycles Conjecture via a Forbidden Subdivision2026-08-312608.30353arxiv
Unary Functions, Automorphisms, and Unlabeled First-Order Model Counting2026-08-312608.30580arxiv

These are bibliographic comparisons, not experimental rankings. Follow the original document for methods and conditions.