arXiv subjects

Ziye Yu

Publications and source records attributed to Ziye Yu.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Convergent representations of elastic-wave structure emerge across deliberately distinct seismic training routes

Elastic-wave propagation connects laboratory fracture with earthquakes, raising the prospect of seismic models that reuse waveform structure across physical scales. Here we show that the phase picker PNSN and the multi-task model SeismicXM organize unseen laboratory acoustic emissions around common waveform relations. Their representations agree on 512 held-out records relative to matched random networks. Four earthquake-model families also track displaced laboratory arrivals without fitting target neural weights. Receiver-function classification is accessible to frozen pretrained features, although standardized random features remain competitive. Noise correlations test the extension to continuous propagation outputs: a nonlinear SeismicXM ensemble improves on random topology, while a period-wise median remains more accurate. Waveform interventions and synthetic controls reveal that the observed agreement depends on feature calibration and the waveforms being compared. These results establish convergent waveform organization across distinct seismic training routes and show that cross-scale arrival transfer is already accessible to compact models.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Does High Signal-to-Noise Ratio Identify Better Training Data for Seismic Deep Learning?

Hard signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) screening removes weak seismic records, but does retaining clearer waveforms improve learning enough to compensate for the discarded data? We test this question in phase picking and ambient-noise dispersion, first matching training counts and then restoring the full eligible dispersion pool at fixed compute. Phase-picking screening gave no consistent unfiltered-test benefit under fine-tuning or random initialization, including a control matched on distance and phase composition. Dispersion screening increased error at the original five-epoch endpoint but improved on an equally sized unscreened set after longer training. Retaining all 29,788 eligible fit paths instead of 9,929 randomly sampled paths reduced unfiltered-test error by 3.0% across three seeds at the same update budget. Full-available and strict-SNR training then had similar mean errors, 0.0405 and 0.0406 km s$^{-1}$, with mixed seed-paired ordering; strict training retained a 9.9% advantage on the SNR-selected test. In two-day monitoring, SNR regulated pick streams but event recovery depended on its measurement definition. High SNR did not reliably identify better training data: gains depended on the task, training schedule, and test domain, and fixed-count comparisons omitted the benefit of retaining additional valid examples.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

From Image Morphology to Multiphysics Earth Posteriors

Structural learning and physical-property inference can draw on different sources of knowledge. We learn morphology from 33,140 natural, satellite, and texture images, without geological training models, then infer Earth properties from physical observations. Identical frozen weights map 128 coordinates into each $256\times256$ compressional-velocity, shear-velocity, or density field. Fixed adapters assign physical meaning; observation-specific likelihoods determine new posteriors without retraining. Across 256 unseen Earth models, image coordinates reduce projection error fourfold relative to a dimension-matched cosine basis. Matched inversions favor image coordinates for the tested curved-velocity targets and a smooth radial basis for the tested faulted targets. A simplified 2.5-dimensional application with 915 measured observations along one 120.9-km southern-California profile constrains a velocity--density contrast. Grouped arrival-time and gravity errors fall by 43% and 44% relative to the pretrained image prior, although the matched smooth radial basis predicts better. Direct layered-Rayleigh updating reduces blind phase-velocity error by 28% at five sites, whereas P-and-gravity-only sharing worsens it, distinguishing reusable morphology from beneficial cross-property coupling. These results establish a practical separation: images supply structural alternatives, and heterogeneous physical observations determine their experiment-specific posterior probabilities.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Wave-Propagation Geometry Emerges from Scalar Travel-Time Relations

Scalar travel-time relations can identify propagation geometry without velocity inputs, ray labels or equation supervision during learning. Physical interpretation is applied after learning through the high-frequency isotropic eikonal relation (Aki and Richards, 2002). Here we show that local value differences constrain derivatives through sampling geometry and smoothness. Controlled neural fields recover propagation directions with $5.34\pm0.07^{\circ}$ median angular error, and local P- and S-wave velocities in a prospectively locked, test-sealed realization. Classical representations also recover geometry. Scalar-matched perturbations separate value accuracy from derivative reliability; regularized inversion can recover structure when direct gradients fail. A field trained on 2.90 million Chinese arrivals retains continental crust--mantle boundary structure: correlation with a withheld reference is $ρ=0.910$ raw and 0.592 after quadratic detrending (spatial-shift $p=0.020$). Direct catalogue values yield $ρ=0.909$, and thickness contrasts are compressed. Manual-only California arrivals support broad velocity organization with limited lateral fidelity. Synthetic quantum fields containing phase information support probability-flow and trajectory readouts without supervising those quantities. These results establish conditional identification across representations and physical settings: informative scalar relations can constrain geometry, while known physical relations supply its interpretation. They do not imply that accurate scalar fitting alone guarantees reliable physical derivatives.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Structure-dependent failure modes of neural priors in acoustic full-waveform inversion

Frequency continuation does not improve every neural representation, and better velocity recovery need not imply better prediction of unseen waveforms. We compare a velocity grid with total-variation regularization, an adapted sinusoidal coordinate network (SIREN), and a frozen image generator with a full-grid residual in two-dimensional acoustic full-waveform inversion. All methods use the same frozen SWEEP discretization, acquisition, observations, background, and budget of 1,500 shot--model gradient evaluations. Three exposed synthetic targets represent inclined layering, curved layering, and a high-contrast curved interface drawn from a fault-labelled family. With 2-to-10 Hz continuation, the generative-residual model attains velocity RMSEs of 218.7, 108.0, and 341.9 m/s, compared with 232.5, 100.3, and 412.9 m/s for Grid+TV. Thus the latter wins on curved layering, while the former improves model RMSE by 5.9% and 17.2% on the other targets. Grid+TV nevertheless predicts held-out 10 Hz shots better on all three. SIREN is worse than the common background in every cell; continuation worsens two targets but improves one. A five-weight TV sensitivity study preserves the CurveFault model-error ranking. An equal-budget variational extension fails both recovery and interval coverage. These results establish conditional rankings, not universal superiority or an isolated spectral-bias mechanism. Full-grid residuals also prevent attributing gains uniquely to the generator. We advocate joint reporting of model recovery, unseen-shot prediction, optimization cost, and negative outcomes when auditing neural FWI.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2026

Physical Sensitivity Kernels Can Emerge in Data-Driven Forward Models: Evidence From Surface-Wave Dispersion

Data-driven neural networks are increasingly used as surrogate forward models in geophysics, but it remains unclear whether they recover only the data mapping or also the underlying physical sensitivity structure. Here we test this question using surface-wave dispersion. By comparing automatically differentiated gradients from a neural-network surrogate with theoretical sensitivity kernels, we show that the learned gradients can recover the main depth-dependent structure of physical kernels across a broad range of periods. This indicates that neural surrogate models can learn physically meaningful differential information, rather than acting as purely black-box predictors. At the same time, strong structural priors in the training distribution can introduce systematic artifacts into the inferred sensitivities. Our results show that neural forward surrogates can recover useful physical information for inversion and uncertainty analysis, while clarifying the conditions under which this differential structure remains physically consistent.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Toward Trustworthy Earthquake Catalogs in the Era of Automated Detection: A Probabilistic Framework for Robust Earthquake Location

The rapid proliferation of deep-learning-based detection and association methods has greatly expanded automatically generated earthquake catalogs, but has also introduced false detections, mis-associated arrivals, and poorly constrained events, making rigorous uncertainty quantification essential. We present a fully probabilistic earthquake location framework that jointly infers hypocenters, origin times, phase-dependent noise scales, and contamination levels within a unified Bayesian formulation. Robustness is achieved through a two-level hierarchical strategy: arrival-time residuals are modeled using a Student-$t$ scale-mixture to accommodate heavy-tailed noise, while an explicit two-component contamination model probabilistically classifies each phase pick as an inlier or outlier, with phase-specific contamination rates inferred from the data. This formulation avoids heuristic data rejection and manual thresholding. Posterior sampling is accelerated using a neural-network travel-time surrogate, enabling scalable inference for large catalogs. Synthetic tests demonstrate well-calibrated posterior uncertainties, and application to the 2022 Luding $M_s$~6.8 aftershock sequence shows that uncertainty-based screening reduces the catalog from 10{,}590 to 6{,}562 events without loss of recall. This framework provides a principled pathway toward statistically trustworthy earthquake catalogs in the era of automated seismic monitoring.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2025

A Deep-Learning-Based Framework for Focal Mechanism Determination and Its Application to the 2022 Luding Earthquake Sequence

P-wave first-motion polarity plays an important role in resolving focal mechanisms of small to moderate earthquakes (M <= 4.5). High-quality focal mechanism solutions for abundant small events can greatly improve our understanding of regional tectonics, fault geometries, and stress-field characteristics. In this study, we develop an automated focal mechanism determination framework that integrates deep neural networks with P-wave first-motion polarity observations, and apply it to the 2022 Luding earthquake sequence. The model is trained on 12 years (2009-2020) of manually annotated 100 Hz waveform records from the China National Seismic Network, achieving a polarity recall of 97.4 percent and a precision of 98.5 percent. After automatically determining the first-motion polarities, we invert focal mechanisms using the HASH method. The resulting focal mechanism solutions show high consistency with mapped fault structures in the Luding region, demonstrating the reliability and applicability of the proposed workflow.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2025

PRIME-DP: Pre-trained Integrated Model for Earthquake Data Processing

We propose a novel seismic wave representation model, namely PRIME-DP (Pre-trained Integrated Model for Earthquake Data Processing), specifically designed for processing seismic waveforms. Most existing models are designed to solve a singular problem. Unlike these models, PRIME-DP is capable of multi-task single station seismic waveform processing, including Pg/Sg/Pn/Sn phase picking and P polarization classification. Moreover, it can be fine-tunned to various tasks, such as event classification without architecture modifications. PRIME-DP can achieve a recall rate of over 85% for Pg and Sg phases on continuous waveforms and achieves over 80% accuracy in P polarization classification. By fine-tuning classification decoder with NeiMeng dataset, PRIME-DP achieves 95.1% accuracy on event.

physics.geo-ph↗

arXiv2025

A Framework for Uncertainty Estimation in Seismology Data Processing with Application to Extract Rayleigh Wave Dispersion Curves from Noise Cross-correlation Functions

Extracting meaningful information from large seismic datasets often requires estimating the uncertainty associated with the results for quantitative analysis. This uncertainty arises from both the raw data and the manually labeled annotations. We introduce an uncertainty estimation framework designed to calculate the uncertainty from manually labeled data. This framework can efficiently output the true posterior from large datasets. We apply the framework to extract Rayleigh wave phase velocity dispersion and compute the posterior distribution of the dispersion results. We utilize 62,899 noise cross-correlation function (NCF) data from 438 stations located in Yunnan Province and manually label the Rayleigh phase velocity dispersion curves. Dispersion curve extraction presents two key challenges: (1) Researchers typically derive dispersion curves from spectrograms in the periodvelocity domain, limiting the ability to directly study the relationship between NCFs and dispersion curves; (2) Assessing uncertainty in manually labeled data remains difficult. To address these challenges, the framework takes the NCFs as input and directly output both the dispersion values and the posterior of the dispersion values when processing the NCF data. This approach allows us to construct a flexible deep neural network (DNN) architecture that balances accuracy and computational efficiency.

physics.geo-ph↗