arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Ziwei Zhuang

Publications and source records attributed to Ziwei Zhuang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A strict amplitude lower bound for the van der Pol equation and extensions to symmetric Liénard systems

We prove that the amplitude of the unique limit cycle of the van der Pol equation $\ddot{x}+μ(x^2-1)\dot{x}+x=0$ is strictly greater than $2$ for every $μ>0$. The proof combines orbit comparison in the relaxation oscillation regime, trigonometric comparison curves in the weakly nonlinear regime, and polynomial energy estimates in the intermediate regime. The polynomial sign conditions arising in the latter two regimes are certified using exact rational arithmetic and Bernstein coefficients. The orbit comparison method also applies to a class of symmetric Liénard systems. Under suitable monotonicity assumptions, we establish a sufficient criterion for the limit cycle amplitude to exceed a critical value determined by the damping function.

math.DS

Stability for a family of planar systems with nilpotent critical points

Consider a family of planar polynomial systems $\dot x = y^{2l-1} - x^{2k+1}, \dot y =-x +m y^{2s+1},$ where $l,k,s\in\mathbb{N^*},$ $2\le l \le 2s$ and $m\in\mathbb{R}.$ We study the center-focus problem on its origin which is a monodromic nilpotent critical point. By directly calculating the generalized Lyapunov constants, we find that the origin is always a focus and we complete the classification of its stability. This includes the most difficult case: $s=kl$ and $m=(2k+1)!!/(2kl+1)!_{(2l)}.$ In this case, we prove that the origin is always unstable. Our result extends and completes a previous one.

math.DS

A proof of the uniqueness of the limit cycle of a quasi-homogeneous system

A. Gasull shared a list of 33 open problems in low dimensional dynamical systems in his work in 2021. The second part of Problem 3 is about whether the limit cycle of a quasi-homogeneous system $ \dot{x}=y,\; \dot{y}=-x^3+αx^2y+y^3 $ is unique. In this paper, we give a positive answer to this question by analysing the uniqueness of the heteroclinic separatrix at infinity.

math.DS