arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Zirong Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Zirong Liu.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

FPTR: Feasibility-Preserving Transactional Refinement for Deadline-Constrained Joint Beam and Resource Allocation

Short-interval wireless schedulers must return a complete, feasible beam-and-resource allocation before each execution deadline, and a late or invalid output gives no utility in the current control cycle. Searching longer can increase transmitted traffic, but it may also miss the deadline or leave only an infeasible intermediate solution. We propose Feasibility-Preserving Transactional Refinement (FPTR), which always keeps a validated feasible allocation, the incumbent. Each refinement stage builds a separate candidate and leaves the incumbent unchanged. A candidate replaces the incumbent only if it is complete, passes the feasibility validator before its stage cutoff, and strictly improves the objective; otherwise it is discarded. Four refinement stages use this rule: buffer-aware resource selection, compatibility-group (CG) user sharing, beam-mask rebuilding from remaining demand, and joint reassignment of two resources. On 150 fixed synthetic instances, the full pipeline (Full) raises traffic by 3.83% on average over a lightweight beam-first reference and by 1.79% over its Base constructor. In a separate suite with matched inputs, Full exceeds six independent search baselines (ALNS, tabu search, GA, simulated annealing, iterated local search, and GRASP) by 6.68-8.35%, where outputs later than 100 ms receive zero utility. All 750 Full runs in the internal suite returned feasible allocations, and none exceeded 100 ms. Separating mandatory output construction from optional refinement lets spare computation time improve the allocation without endangering the incumbent. The open-source implementation supports independent reproduction.

cs.AI↗

CardioVascBench:Prioritized Diagnosis Generation from Real-World Chinese Cardiovascular Records

Identifying the primary diagnosis alone does not fully characterize a model's diagnosis-generation performance. We introduce CardioVascBench, a retrospective benchmark for prioritized diagnosis generation from real-world Chinese cardiovascular inpatient records. It contains 3,262 de-identified cases, with 2,174 for training and 1,088 for evaluation, linking clinical narratives and textual ECG reports to expert-verified, ordered discharge diagnoses standardized to ICD-10. An English translation of the evaluation set supports aligned cross-lingual comparison. Our evaluation protocol combines terminology normalization and rank-aware scoring to separately assess primary-diagnosis identification, reference-diagnosis coverage, and list precision. Evaluation across 36 systems shows that higher primary-diagnosis accuracy does not necessarily imply higher list precision against discharge references. We also provide CardioKG-Agent, a knowledge-enhanced baseline combining entity normalization, constrained graph retrieval, and guideline evidence. In a staged comparison of three baseline models, supervised fine-tuning plus the agent achieves a 73.5% higher mean composite score than fine-tuning alone, representing a system-level gain. These results measure retrospective agreement with recorded diagnoses; agreement between metric rankings and physician judgments remains to be validated. CardioVascBench supports research on diagnosis prioritization and knowledge-enhanced generation.

cs.CL↗

Reliability-Aware Multimodal Sentiment Prediction Under Local Modality Missingness

Multimodal sentiment models are usually evaluated on complete utterances, yet streams often lose a contiguous span of text, audio, or video. We study local missingness on aligned CMU-MOSEI features. Our reliability-aware network (RM-Net) keeps the original temporal positions, represents unobserved positions with a learned token, outputs bounded per-modality intensity contributions gated by observation quality, and is trained with dual-view masking of contiguous segments. We fuse five RM-Net seeds with a LoRA-adapted BERT text expert, using a fusion weight that depends only on the visible fraction of content tokens. Architecture, checkpoint, and fusion choices were made on the validation split. On the held-out split, the fused model reaches a macro-F1 of 0.655 on clean inputs and 0.634 under 40\% mixed missingness; its two-view average exceeds the auxiliary-head baseline by 0.024 (95\% video-cluster bootstrap interval [0.003, 0.045]). Because this split was inspected during development, these numbers are not a blind test. For explanations, exact Shapley attributions over the eight modality subsets and position-level occlusion show that top-ranked positions reduce the predicted-class probability faster than random positions (AUC gap 0.113 on validation). We also describe an auditable word-level alignment pipeline for raw clips; its outputs do not feed the predictive models.

cs.CV↗

PhysAlign: A Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Role Alignment in Multimodal Physics Reasoning

A key challenge in physics diagram understanding is correctly associating visual information with the physical entities, relations, and conditions it describes. Even when a value, symbol, or other local element is accurately recognized, assigning it to the wrong entity or scope can distort the underlying physical premise and lead to incorrect reasoning. To systematically study this challenge, we introduce \textbf{PhysAlign}, a benchmark designed to assess whether multimodal models correctly associate information recognized from physics diagrams with its intended physical role. By disentangling visual recognition from physical-role assignment through localized probes and controlled variants, PhysAlign isolates correspondence errors from recognition failures. It contains 3,341 human-validated probes spanning 986 physics problems, enabling systematic evaluation of visual recognition and physical-role correspondence at scale. We further introduce five complementary evaluation metrics, including CAcc, GAcc, and JAcc, which provide a comprehensive assessment of models' ability to recognize diagram content, establish correct physical correspondences, and solve the underlying physics problem. Across our evaluated multimodal models, PhysAlign reveals a consistent gap between local visual recognition and physical-role grounding. Even when the queried content is correctly recognized, the conditional correspondence error rate remains 13.8\% for GPT-6-Astra and rises to about 50.6\% for InternVL3.5-8B. These findings indicate that strong perception alone does not ensure reliable physical interpretation, exposing a distinct grounding bottleneck that is largely hidden by answer-level accuracy and highlighting the need for future models to better align recognized visual evidence with its physical meaning.

cs.AI↗

A Note About Algebraic $(s, t)$-Weak Tractability Of Linear Tensor Product Problems In The Worst-Case Setting

This paper is devoted to discussing the linear tensor product problems in the worst case setting. We consider algorithms that use finitely many evaluations of arbitrary continuous linear functionals. We investigate algebraic $(s, t)$-weak tractability (ALG-$(s, t)$-WT) under the absolute error criterion in the case $λ_1 > 1$, where $λ_1$ is the square of the univariate maximal singular value. We solve the problem by giving the necessary and sufficient conditions for ALG-$(s, t)$-WT on univariate singular values and fill the gap left open.

math.NA↗

SeePhys Pro: Diagnosing Modality Transfer and Blind-Training Effects in Multimodal RLVR for Physics Reasoning

We introduce SeePhys Pro, a fine-grained modality transfer benchmark that studies whether models preserve the same reasoning capability when critical information is progressively transferred from text to image. Unlike standard vision-essential benchmarks that evaluate a single input form, SeePhys Pro features four semantically aligned variants for each problem with progressively increasing visual elements. Our evaluation shows that current frontier models are far from representation-invariant reasoners: performance degrades on average as information moves from language to diagrams, with visual variable grounding as the most critical bottleneck. Motivated by this inference-time fragility, we further develop large training corpora for multimodal RLVR and use blind training as a diagnostic control, finding that RL with all training images masked can still improve performance on unmasked validation sets. To analyze this effect, text-deletion, image-mask-rate, and format-saturation controls suggest that such gains can arise from residual textual and distributional cues rather than valid visual evidence. Our results highlight the need to evaluate multimodal reasoning not only by final-answer accuracy, but also by robustness under modality transfer and by diagnostics that test whether improvements rely on task-critical visual evidence.

cs.AI↗

Aligning Perception, Reasoning, Modeling and Interaction: A Survey on Physical AI

The rapid advancement of embodied intelligence and world models has intensified efforts to integrate physical laws into AI systems, yet physical perception and symbolic physics reasoning have developed along separate trajectories without a unified bridging framework. This work provides a comprehensive overview of physical AI, establishing clear distinctions between theoretical physics reasoning and applied physical understanding while systematically examining how physics-grounded methods enhance AI's real-world comprehension across structured symbolic reasoning, embodied systems, and generative models. Through rigorous analysis of recent advances, we advocate for intelligent systems that ground learning in both physical principles and embodied reasoning processes, transcending pattern recognition toward genuine understanding of physical laws. Our synthesis envisions next-generation world models capable of explaining physical phenomena and predicting future states, advancing safe, generalizable, and interpretable AI systems. We maintain a continuously updated resource at https://github.com/AI4Phys/Awesome-AI-for-Physics.

cs.AI↗

A note about exponential tractability of linear weighted tensor product problems in the worst-case setting

This paper is devoted to discussing the weighted linear tensor product problems in the worst case setting. We consider algorithms that use finitely many evaluations of arbitrary continuous linear functionals. We investigate exponential $(s, t)$-weak tractability (EXP-$(s, t)$-WT) with $\max(s,t)<1$ and exponential uniform weak tractability (EXP-UWT) under the absolute or normalized error criterion. We solve the problem by filling the remaining gaps left open on EXP-tractability. That is, we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for EXP-$(s, t)$-WT with $\max(s, t) < 1$ and for EXP-UWT.

cs.CC↗

SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? -- Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoning

We present SeePhys, a large-scale multimodal benchmark for LLM reasoning grounded in physics questions ranging from middle school to PhD qualifying exams. The benchmark covers 7 fundamental domains spanning the physics discipline, incorporating 21 categories of highly heterogeneous diagrams. In contrast to prior works where visual elements mainly serve auxiliary purposes, our benchmark features a substantial proportion of vision-essential problems (75%) that mandate visual information extraction for correct solutions. Through extensive evaluation, we observe that even the most advanced visual reasoning models (e.g., Gemini-2.5-pro and o4-mini) achieve sub-60% accuracy on our benchmark. These results reveal fundamental challenges in current large language models' visual understanding capabilities, particularly in: (i) establishing rigorous coupling between diagram interpretation and physics reasoning, and (ii) overcoming their persistent reliance on textual cues as cognitive shortcuts.

cs.AI↗

GlanceSeg: Real-time microaneurysm lesion segmentation with gaze-map-guided foundation model for early detection of diabetic retinopathy

Early-stage diabetic retinopathy (DR) presents challenges in clinical diagnosis due to inconspicuous and minute microangioma lesions, resulting in limited research in this area. Additionally, the potential of emerging foundation models, such as the segment anything model (SAM), in medical scenarios remains rarely explored. In this work, we propose a human-in-the-loop, label-free early DR diagnosis framework called GlanceSeg, based on SAM. GlanceSeg enables real-time segmentation of microangioma lesions as ophthalmologists review fundus images. Our human-in-the-loop framework integrates the ophthalmologist's gaze map, allowing for rough localization of minute lesions in fundus images. Subsequently, a saliency map is generated based on the located region of interest, which provides prompt points to assist the foundation model in efficiently segmenting microangioma lesions. Finally, a domain knowledge filter refines the segmentation of minute lesions. We conducted experiments on two newly-built public datasets, i.e., IDRiD and Retinal-Lesions, and validated the feasibility and superiority of GlanceSeg through visualized illustrations and quantitative measures. Additionally, we demonstrated that GlanceSeg improves annotation efficiency for clinicians and enhances segmentation performance through fine-tuning using annotations. This study highlights the potential of GlanceSeg-based annotations for self-model optimization, leading to enduring performance advancements through continual learning.

eess.IV↗