arXiv subjects

Ziming Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Ziming Wang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Interpretable and Fair Generalized Additive Neural Networks via Multi-objective Learning

Interpretability and fairness are two of the most emphasized dimensions in trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI). Various explainable AI methods have been introduced to improve interpretability. This paper focuses on neural network (NN)-based generalized additive models (GAMs), a class of self-interpretable models. While most existing research has prioritized improving the accuracy of NN-based GAMs, their interpretability remains largely underexplored. To address this gap, this paper introduces explicit quantitative metrics for evaluating the interpretability of NN-based GAMs, empirically examines their effectiveness, and explores strategies for improving interpretability within these models. In addition, the simultaneous and explicit optimization of both interpretability and fairness, along with their trade-offs and the underlying reasons, remains underexplored. To address this, we propose a multi-objective neural basis model (MONBM) framework based on multi-objective evolutionary learning to consider accuracy, interpretability, and fairness simultaneously. A partial retraining strategy is further developed to facilitate the practical application of evolutionary multi-objective optimization to deep model architectures. Based on MONBM, this paper reveals the complex relationships between these dimensions and the reasons behind these intricate relationships. This analysis demonstrates how multi-objective optimization can be combined with self-interpretable models to reveal relationships among trustworthiness objectives. In addition, MONBM obtains a set of models with different trade-offs between dimensions, and the competitiveness of the approach is validated by comparing it with state-of-the-art methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

World-Model-Augmented Visual Locomotion for Humanoids on Foothold-Constrained Terrain

Foothold-constrained terrain is characterized by sparse, discontinuous, or geometrically restricted feasible foot contacts, as encountered on stepping stones, across gaps, and on narrow stair treads. On such terrain, a single misstep often leaves little room to recover, so policies that base foot-placement decisions primarily on the immediately visible terrain are prone to failure. We ask whether a learned predictive summary of near-future observations and rewards can provide the anticipatory information required in such settings. We present World-Model-Augmented Visual Locomotion (WM-LOCO), which jointly trains a recurrent world model and a PPO policy. Conditioned on proprioception and a single onboard depth image, the world model produces a predictive recurrent feature that guides the policy, without explicit foothold labels. In simulation, WM-LOCO succeeds on gaps and stepping stones where a matched baseline fails completely, and matches the baseline's success rate on stairs while improving stride efficiency and reducing pelvis acceleration. We deploy the same policy onboard a physical Unitree G1 humanoid using onboard proprioception and a single depth stream; it traverses all three terrain classes with an average success rate of 93.3%.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

AERA: Adaptive Evidence Residual Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Reasoning

Test-time scaling improves language-model reasoning by generating additional candidate solutions, but allocating the same inference budget to every problem is computationally wasteful. Existing adaptive stopping methods commonly rely on confidence, agreement, or answer stability, implicitly assuming that stronger current evidence indicates that further computation is unnecessary. We show that this assumption can fail: checkpoint-level correctness evolves non-monotonically, and observable evidence may strengthen before an answer collapses or weaken before it recovers. Motivated by this mismatch, we introduce Adaptive Evidence Residual Allocation (AERA), a sequential controller that learns whether additional computation is likely to recover a better answer from checkpoint-observable evidence. AERA characterizes cumulative response prefixes using answer-distribution, temporal, re-solving, semantic, and compute features, and repeatedly decides whether to stop or allocate the next response block. Future checkpoint correctness is used only to construct offline supervision and is never available to the controller at inference time. Across GSM8K and GPQA Diamond, AERA identifies question-specific residual opportunities while substantially reducing inference computation. In a frozen-threshold incremental-generation evaluation on 300 untouched GSM8K questions, AERA achieves 92.61% accuracy versus 93.01% with 128 responses while reducing completion tokens by 95.99%. These results suggest that adaptive reasoning should estimate the future value of computation rather than equating present confidence with correctness.

cs.AI↗