arXiv subjects

Zhiyu Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Zhiyu Chen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

DI-Bench: Systematically Generating In-Domain Data Intelligence Benchmarks for Enterprise Agents

Evaluating enterprise agents on domain-specific benchmarks is critical, yet public benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can integrate business knowledge with analytical computation, and constructing such benchmarks manually is costly. We present DI-Bench, a pipeline for generating realistic benchmarks for data intelligence (DI), the practice of extracting insights from large volumes of enterprise data. To emulate realistic DI tasks that require both computation and knowledge retrieval, DI-Bench builds an artifact linkage graph over data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents to form questions involving structured data and associated knowledge. Ground truth answers are derived via query execution, followed by LLM question generation and validation. Applied to two public datasets, the pipeline produces a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule-grounded reasoning. To show the discriminatory capability and difficulty of the benchmark, we evaluate four models, revealing a substantial finding: models achieve only 32% accuracy when doing computational tasks where retrieved business rules modify the computation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CacheBridge: Efficient Cross-Model KV Cache Transfer

Sharing context between LLMs in a multi-model system requires the receiving model to prefill the shared prefix because KV caches are model-specific. Recent closed-form cross-model KV transfer, hereafter Full-Head Mapping, avoids this replay by fitting a training-free affine mapper from source to target caches. However, its full-head design maps each target KV head from every source KV head in the selected layers, making transfer quality sensitive to architectural differences and causing mapper storage and application cost to grow with layer support. To this end, we introduce CacheBridge, which co-designs architecture-indexed mapper support, attention-aligned calibration, and bounded mapper construction while retaining a closed-form affine interface for online deployment. CacheBridge restricts each target head to a matched source head, weights reconstruction errors by causal attention sensitivity, and uses a fused GPU kernel to construct weighted sufficient statistics without materializing full observation tensors. Across three transfer directions, CacheBridge recovers the two Ministral 3 transfer directions where Full-Head Mapping loses substantial accuracy while preserving 99.83\% mean target retention on Qwen3. On Qwen3 $14\mathrm{B}\to32\mathrm{B}$, it reduces mapper storage by $8\times$, accelerates application by up to $3.0\times$, matches \fullhead with one tenth of the calibration data, and reduces 500-sequence construction from 92.63 to 8.63 seconds ($10.7\times$).

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Ideation Arena: Evaluating LLM Generated Research Ideas with Battle-style Human Expert Assessment

Evaluating research ideas generated by LLMs is difficult because their scientific value cannot be fully determined by objective criteria, and no single reference answer specifies what counts as a good idea. To address this challenge, we introduce Ideation Arena, a battle style platform that evaluates research ideas through pairwise human assessment. Ideation Arena evaluates ideas generated by 14 frontier LLMs and 5 research agent architectures built on 2 base models. To ensure a common starting point, Ideation Arena builds shared literature contexts from papers familiar to the participating researchers and provides the same contexts to all LLMs and agents. We collect over 6,000 double blind pairwise comparisons from 105 active computer science researchers and construct an Elo rating leaderboard of proposal-stage expert preferences in computer science under a shared closed-context protocol. We validate the rankings through interrater agreement and robustness analyses, showing that the leaderboard remains stable under changes in annotator composition and domain coverage. Our results show substantial variation in agent effectiveness, with some frameworks improving ideation quality over their backbones and others offering little benefit or even underperforming their base models. We further construct Ideation Arena Eval, a benchmark for assessing whether automated evaluators align with human preferences in research ideation. Experiments with current LLM judges show that they still cannot reliably reproduce expert preferences, with the best judge reaching 72.56% Soft Accuracy on Overall Quality. Our code, data, and leaderboards are available at https://github.com/foss12138/Research-Ideation-Arena.

cs.AI↗