arXiv subjects

Zhihao Gavin Tang

Publications and source records attributed to Zhihao Gavin Tang.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2024

Sample-Based Matroid Prophet Inequalities

We study matroid prophet inequalities when distributions are unknown and accessible only through samples. While single-sample prophet inequalities for special matroids are known, no constant-factor competitive algorithm with even a sublinear number of samples was known for general matroids. Adding more to the stake, the single-sample version of the question for general matroids has close (two-way) connections with the long-standing matroid secretary conjecture. In this work, we give a $(\frac14 - \varepsilon)$-competitive matroid prophet inequality with only $O_\varepsilon(\mathrm{poly} \log n)$ samples. Our algorithm consists of two parts: (i) a novel quantile-based reduction from matroid prophet inequalities to online contention resolution schemes (OCRSs) with $O_\varepsilon(\log n)$ samples, and (ii) a $(\frac14 - \varepsilon)$-selectable matroid OCRS with $O_\varepsilon(\mathrm{poly} \log n)$ samples which carefully addresses an adaptivity challenge.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Optimal Robust Contract Design

We consider the robust contract design problem when the principal only has limited information about the actions the agent can take. The principal evaluates a contract according to its worst-case performance caused by the uncertain action space. Carroll (AER 2015) showed that a linear contract is optimal among deterministic contracts. Recently, Kambhampati (JET 2023) showed that the principal's payoff can be strictly increased via randomization over linear contracts. In this paper, we characterize the optimal randomized contract, which remains linear and admits a closed form of its cumulative density function. The advantage of randomized contracts over deterministic contracts can be arbitrarily large even when the principal knows only one non-trivial action of the agent. Furthermore, our result generalizes to the model of contracting with teams, by Dai and Toikka (Econometrica 2022).

econ.TH↗

arXiv2024

Choosing Behind the Veil: Tight Bounds for Identity-Blind Online Algorithms

In Bayesian online settings, every element has a value that is drawn from a known underlying distribution, which we refer to as the element's identity. The elements arrive sequentially. Upon the arrival of an element, its value is revealed, and the decision maker needs to decide, immediately and irrevocably, whether to accept it or not. While most previous work has assumed that the decision maker, upon observing the element's value, also becomes aware of its identity -- namely, its distribution -- practical scenarios frequently demand that decisions be made based solely on the element's value, without considering its identity. This necessity arises either from the algorithm's ignorance of the element's identity or due to the pursuit of fairness. We call such algorithms identity-blind algorithms, and propose the identity-blindness gap as a metric to evaluate the performance loss caused by identity-blindness. This gap is defined as the maximum ratio between the expected performance of an identity-blind online algorithm and an optimal online algorithm that knows the arrival order, thus also the identities. We study the identity-blindness gap in the paradigmatic prophet inequality problem, under the two objectives of maximizing the expected value, and maximizing the probability to obtain the highest value. For the max-expectation objective, the celebrated prophet inequality establishes a single-threshold algorithm that gives at least 1/2 of the offline optimum, thus also an identity-blindness gap of at least 1/2. We show that this bound is tight. For the max-probability objective, while the competitive ratio is tightly 1/e, we provide a deterministic single-threshold algorithm that gives an identity-blindness gap of $\sim 0.562$ under the assumption that there are no large point masses. Moreover, we show that this bound is tight with respect to deterministic algorithms.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Online Ordinal Problems: Optimality of Comparison-based Algorithms and their Cardinal Complexity

We consider ordinal online problems, i.e., tasks that only require pairwise comparisons between elements of the input. A classic example is the secretary problem and the game of googol, as well as its multiple combinatorial extensions such as $(J,K)$-secretary, $2$-sided game of googol, ordinal-competitive matroid secretary. A natural approach to these tasks is to use ordinal algorithms that at each step only consider relative ranking among the arrived elements, without looking at the numerical values of the input. We formally study the question of how cardinal algorithms can improve upon ordinal algorithms. We give first a universal construction of the input distribution for any ordinal online problem, such that the advantage of any cardinal algorithm over the ordinal algorithms is at most $1+\varepsilon$ for arbitrary small $\varepsilon> 0$. As an implication, previous lower bounds for the aforementioned variants of secretary problems hold not only against ordinal algorithms, but also against any online algorithm. However, the value range of the input elements in our construction is huge: $N=O\left(\frac{n^3\cdot n!\cdot n!}{\varepsilon}\right)\uparrow\uparrow(n-1)$ (tower of exponents) for an input sequence of length $n$. As a second result, we identify a class of natural ordinal problems and find cardinal algorithm with a matching advantage of $1+ Ω\left(\frac{1}{\log^{(c)}N}\right),$ where $\log^{(c)}N=\log\ldots\log N$ with $c$ iterative logs and $c$ is an arbitrary constant. Further, we introduce the cardinal complexity for any given ordinal online task: the minimum size $N(\varepsilon)$ of different numerical values in the input such the advantage of cardinal over ordinal algorithms is at most $1+\varepsilon$. As a third result, we show that the game of googol has much lower cardinal complexity of $N=O\left(\left(\frac{n}{\varepsilon}\right)^n\right)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

On the Perturbation Function of Ranking and Balance for Weighted Online Bipartite Matching

Ranking and Balance are arguably the two most important algorithms in the online matching literature. They achieve the same optimal competitive ratio of $1-1/e$ for the integral version and fractional version of online bipartite matching by Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani (STOC 1990) respectively. The two algorithms have been generalized to weighted online bipartite matching problems, including vertex-weighted online bipartite matching and AdWords, by utilizing a perturbation function. The canonical choice of the perturbation function is $f(x)=1-e^{x-1}$ as it leads to the optimal competitive ratio of $1-1/e$ in both settings. We advance the understanding of the weighted generalizations of Ranking and Balance in this paper, with a focus on studying the effect of different perturbation functions. First, we prove that the canonical perturbation function is the \emph{unique} optimal perturbation function for vertex-weighted online bipartite matching. In stark contrast, all perturbation functions achieve the optimal competitive ratio of $1-1/e$ in the unweighted setting. Second, we prove that the generalization of Ranking to AdWords with unknown budgets using the canonical perturbation function is at most $0.624$ competitive, refuting a conjecture of Vazirani (2021). More generally, as an application of the first result, we prove that no perturbation function leads to the prominent competitive ratio of $1-1/e$ by establishing an upper bound of $1-1/e-0.0003$. Finally, we propose the online budget-additive welfare maximization problem that is intermediate between AdWords and AdWords with unknown budgets, and we design an optimal $1-1/e$ competitive algorithm by generalizing Balance.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Bidder Subset Selection Problem in Auction Design

Motivated by practical concerns in the online advertising industry, we study a bidder subset selection problem in single-item auctions. In this problem, a large pool of candidate bidders have independent values sampled from known prior distributions. The seller needs to pick a subset of bidders and run a given auction format on the selected subset to maximize her expected revenue. We propose two frameworks for the subset restrictions: (i) capacity constraint on the set of selected bidders; and (ii) incurred costs for the bidders invited to the auction. For the second-price auction with anonymous reserve (SPA-AR), we give constant approximation polynomial time algorithms in both frameworks (in the latter framework under mild assumptions about the market). Our results are in stark contrast to the previous work of Mehta, Nadav, Psomas, Rubinstein [NeurIPS 2020], who showed hardness of approximation for the SPA without a reserve price. We also give complimentary approximation results for other well-studied auction formats such as anonymous posted pricing and sequential posted pricing. On a technical level, we find that the revenue of SPA-AR as a set function $f(S)$ of its bidders $S$ is fractionally-subadditive but not submodular. Our bidder selection problem with invitation costs is a natural question about (approximately) answering a demand oracle for $f(\cdot)$ under a given vector of costs, a common computational assumption in the literature on combinatorial auctions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

"Who Is Next in Line?'' On the Significance of Knowing the Arrival Order in Bayesian Online Settings

We introduce a new measure for the performance of online algorithms in Bayesian settings, where the input is drawn from a known prior, but the realizations are revealed one-by-one in an online fashion. Our new measure is called order-competitive ratio. It is defined as the worst case (over all distribution sequences) ratio between the performance of the best order-unaware and order-aware algorithms, and quantifies the loss that is incurred due to lack of knowledge of the arrival order. Despite the growing interest in the role of the arrival order on the performance of online algorithms, this loss has been overlooked thus far. We study the order-competitive ratio in the paradigmatic prophet inequality problem, for the two common objective functions of (i) maximizing the expected value, and (ii) maximizing the probability of obtaining the largest value; and with respect to two families of algorithms, namely (i) adaptive algorithms, and (ii) single-threshold algorithms. We provide tight bounds for all four combinations, with respect to deterministic algorithms. Our analysis requires new ideas and departs from standard techniques. In particular, our adaptive algorithms inevitably go beyond single-threshold algorithms. The results with respect to the order-competitive ratio measure capture the intuition that adaptive algorithms are stronger than single-threshold ones, and may lead to a better algorithmic advice than the classical competitive ratio measure.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Lookahead Auctions with Pooling

A Lookahead Auction (LA), introduced by Ronen, is an auction format for the sale of a single item among multiple buyers, which is considered simpler and more fair than the optimal auction. Indeed, it anonymously selects a provisional winner by a symmetric ascending-price process, and only then uses a personalized posted price. A LA auction extracts at least 1/2 of the optimal revenue, even under a correlated value distribution. This bound is tight, even for 2 buyers with independent values. We introduce a natural extension of LA, called lookahead with pooling (LAP). A LAP auction proceeds as LA, with one difference: it allows the seller to pool together a range of values during the ascending-price stage, and treat them the same; thus, it preserves the simplicity and fairness of LA. Our main result is that this simple pooling operation improves the revenue guarantees for independent buyers from 1/2 to 4/7 of the optimal revenue. We also give a complementary negative result, showing that for arbitrary correlated priors LAP cannot do better than 1/2 approximation.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2022

Online Facility Location with Predictions

We provide nearly optimal algorithms for online facility location (OFL) with predictions. In OFL, $n$ demand points arrive in order and the algorithm must irrevocably assign each demand point to an open facility upon its arrival. The objective is to minimize the total connection costs from demand points to assigned facilities plus the facility opening cost. We further assume the algorithm is additionally given for each demand point $x_i$ a natural prediction $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{pred}}$ which is supposed to be the facility $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{opt}}$ that serves $x_i$ in the offline optimal solution. Our main result is an $O(\min\{\log {\frac{nη_\infty}{\mathrm{OPT}}}, \log{n} \})$-competitive algorithm where $η_\infty$ is the maximum prediction error (i.e., the distance between $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{pred}}$ and $f_{x_i}^{\mathrm{opt}}$). Our algorithm overcomes the fundamental $Ω(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n})$ lower bound of OFL (without predictions) when $η_\infty$ is small, and it still maintains $O(\log n)$ ratio even when $η_\infty$ is unbounded. Furthermore, our theoretical analysis is supported by empirical evaluations for the tradeoffs between $η_\infty$ and the competitive ratio on various real datasets of different types.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

(Fractional) Online Stochastic Matching via Fine-Grained Offline Statistics

Motivated by display advertising on the internet, the online stochastic matching problem is proposed by Feldman, Mehta, Mirrokni, and Muthukrishnan (FOCS 2009). Consider a stochastic bipartite graph with offline vertices on one side and with i.i.d. online vertices on the other side. The algorithm knows the offline vertices and the distribution of the online vertices in advance. Upon the arrival of each online vertex, its type is realized and the algorithm immediately and irrevocably decides how to match it. In the vertex-weighted version of the problem, each offline vertex is associated with a weight and the goal is to maximize the total weight of the matching. In this paper, we generalize the model to allow non-identical online vertices and focus on the fractional version of the vertex-weighted stochastic matching. We design fractional algorithms that are $0.718$-competitive and $0.731$-competitive for non i.i.d. arrivals and i.i.d. arrivals respectively. We also prove that no fractional algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than $0.75$ for non i.i.d. arrivals. Furthermore, we round our fractional algorithms by applying the recently developed multiway online correlated selection by Gao et al. (FOCS 2021) and achieve $0.666$-competitive and $0.704$-competitive integral algorithms for non i.i.d. arrivals and i.i.d. arrivals. Our results for non i.i.d. arrivals are the first algorithms beating the $1-1/e \approx 0.632$ barrier of the classical adversarial setting. Our $0.704$-competitive integral algorithm for i.i.d. arrivals slightly improves the state-of-the-art $0.701$-competitive ratio by Huang and Shu (STOC 2021).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Order Selection Prophet Inequality: From Threshold Optimization to Arrival Time Design

In the classical prophet inequality, a gambler faces a sequence of items, whose values are drawn independently from known distributions. Upon the arrival of each item, its value is realized and the gambler either accepts it and the game ends, or irrevocably rejects it and continues to the next item. The goal is to maximize the value of the selected item and compete against the expected maximum value of all items. A tight competitive ratio of $\frac{1}{2}$ is established in the classical setting and various relaxations have been proposed to surpass the barrier, including the i.i.d. model, the order selection model, and the random order model. In this paper, we advance the study of the order selection prophet inequality, in which the gambler is given the extra power for selecting the arrival order of the items. Our main result is a $0.725$-competitive algorithm, that substantially improves the state-of-the-art $0.669$ ratio by Correa, Saona and Ziliotto~(Math. Program. 2021), achieved in the harder random order model. Recently, Agrawal, Sethuraman and Zhang~(EC 2021) proved that the task of selecting the optimal order is NP-hard. Despite this fact, we introduce a novel algorithm design framework that translates the discrete order selection problem into a continuous arrival time design problem. From this perspective, we can focus on the arrival time design without worrying about the threshold optimization afterwards. As a side result, we achieve the optimal $0.745$ competitive ratio by applying our algorithm to the i.i.d. model.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Improved Bounds for Fractional Online Matching Problems

Online bipartite matching with one-sided arrival and its variants have been extensively studied since the seminal work of Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani (STOC 1990). Motivated by real-life applications with dynamic market structures, e.g. ride-sharing, two generalizations of the classical one-sided arrival model are proposed to allow non-bipartite graphs and to allow all vertices to arrive online. Namely, online matching with general vertex arrival is introduced by Wang and Wong (ICALP 2015), and fully online matching is introduced by Huang et al. (JACM 2020). In this paper, we study the fractional versions of the two models. We improve three out of the four state-of-the-art upper and lower bounds of the two models. For fully online matching, we design a $0.6$-competitive algorithm and prove no algorithm can be $0.613$-competitive. For online matching with general vertex arrival, we prove no algorithm can be $0.584$-competitive. Moreover, we give an arguably more intuitive algorithm for the general vertex arrival model, compared to the algorithm of Wang and Wong, while attaining the same competitive ratio of $0.526$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Oblivious Online Contention Resolution Schemes

Contention resolution schemes (CRSs) are powerful tools for obtaining "ex post feasible" solutions from candidates that are drawn from "ex ante feasible" distributions. Online contention resolution schemes (OCRSs), the online version, have found myriad applications in Bayesian and stochastic problems, such as prophet inequalities and stochastic probing. When the ex ante distribution is unknown, it was unknown whether good CRSs/OCRSs exist with no sample (in which case the scheme is oblivious) or few samples from the distribution. In this work, we give a simple $\frac{1}{e}$-selectable oblivious single item OCRS by mixing two simple schemes evenly, and show, via a Ramsey theory argument, that it is optimal. On the negative side, we show that no CRS or OCRS with $O(1)$ samples can be $Ω(1)$-balanced/selectable (i.e., preserve every active candidate with a constant probability) for graphic or transversal matroids.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Secretary Matching with General Arrivals

We provide online algorithms for secretary matching in general weighted graphs, under the well-studied models of vertex and edge arrivals. In both models, edges are associated with arbitrary weights that are unknown from the outset, and are revealed online. Under vertex arrival, vertices arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of a vertex $v$, the weights of edges from $v$ to all previously arriving vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. Under edge arrival, edges arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of an edge $e$, its weight is revealed, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. We provide a $5/12$-competitive algorithm for vertex arrival, and show it is tight. For edge arrival, we provide a $1/4$-competitive algorithm. Both results improve upon state of the art bounds for the corresponding settings. Interestingly, for vertex arrival, secretary matching in general graphs outperforms secretary matching in bipartite graphs with 1-sided arrival, where $1/e$ is the best possible guarantee.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Generalizing Complex Hypotheses on Product Distributions: Auctions, Prophet Inequalities, and Pandora's Problem

This paper explores a theory of generalization for learning problems on product distributions, complementing the existing learning theories in the sense that it does not rely on any complexity measures of the hypothesis classes. The main contributions are two general sample complexity bounds: (1) $\tilde{O} \big( \frac{nk}{ε^2} \big)$ samples are sufficient and necessary for learning an $ε$-optimal hypothesis in any problem on an $n$-dimensional product distribution, whose marginals have finite supports of sizes at most $k$; (2) $\tilde{O} \big( \frac{n}{ε^2} \big)$ samples are sufficient and necessary for any problem on $n$-dimensional product distributions if it satisfies a notion of strong monotonicity from the algorithmic game theory literature. As applications of these theories, we match the optimal sample complexity for single-parameter revenue maximization (Guo et al., STOC 2019), improve the state-of-the-art for multi-parameter revenue maximization (Gonczarowski and Weinberg, FOCS 2018) and prophet inequality (Correa et al., EC 2019), and provide the first and tight sample complexity bound for Pandora's problem.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Online Stochastic Matching with Edge Arrivals

Online bipartite matching with edge arrivals remained a major open question for a long time until a recent negative result by [Gamlath et al. FOCS 2019], who showed that no online policy is better than the straightforward greedy algorithm, i.e., no online algorithm has a worst-case competitive ratio better than $0.5$. In this work, we consider the bipartite matching problem with edge arrivals in a natural stochastic framework, i.e., Bayesian setting where each edge of the graph is independently realized according to a known probability distribution. We focus on a natural class of prune & greedy online policies motivated by practical considerations from a multitude of online matching platforms. Any prune & greedy algorithm consists of two stages: first, it decreases the probabilities of some edges in the stochastic instance and then runs greedy algorithm on the pruned graph. We propose prune & greedy algorithms that are $0.552$-competitive on the instances that can be pruned to a $2$-regular stochastic bipartite graph, and $0.503$-competitive on arbitrary bipartite graphs. The algorithms and our analysis significantly deviate from the prior work. We first obtain analytically manageable lower bound on the size of the matching, which leads to a non linear optimization problem. We further reduce this problem to a continuous optimization with a constant number of parameters that can be solved using standard software tools.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Fully Online Matching II: Beating Ranking and Water-filling

Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani (STOC 1990) initiated the study of online bipartite matching, which has held a central role in online algorithms ever since. Of particular importance are the Ranking algorithm for integral matching and the Water-filling algorithm for fractional matching. Most algorithms in the literature can be viewed as adaptations of these two in the corresponding models. Recently, Huang et al.~(STOC 2018, SODA 2019) introduced a more general model called \emph{fully online matching}, which considers general graphs and allows all vertices to arrive online. They also generalized Ranking and Water-filling to fully online matching and gave some tight analysis: Ranking is $Ω\approx 0.567$-competitive on bipartite graphs where the $Ω$-constant satisfies $Ωe^Ω= 1$, and Water-filling is $2-\sqrt{2} \approx 0.585$-competitive on general graphs. We propose fully online matching algorithms strictly better than Ranking and Water-filling. For integral matching on bipartite graphs, we build on the online primal dual analysis of Ranking and Water-filling to design a $0.569$-competitive hybrid algorithm called Balanced Ranking. To our knowledge, it is the first integral algorithm in the online matching literature that successfully integrates ideas from Water-filling. For fractional matching on general graphs, we give a $0.592$-competitive algorithm called Eager Water-filling, which may match a vertex on its arrival. By contrast, the original Water-filling algorithm always matches vertices at their deadlines. Our result for fractional matching further shows a separation between fully online matching and the general vertex arrival model by Wang and Wong (ICALP 2015), due to an upper bound of $0.5914$ in the latter model by Buchbinder, Segev, and Tkach (ESA 2017).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Towards a Better Understanding of Randomized Greedy Matching

There has been a long history for studying randomized greedy matching algorithms since the work by Dyer and Frieze~(RSA 1991). We follow this trend and consider the problem formulated in the oblivious setting, in which the algorithm makes (random) decisions that are essentially oblivious to the input graph. We revisit the \textsf{Modified Randomized Greedy (MRG)} algorithm by Aronson et al.~(RSA 1995) that is proved to be $(0.5+ε)$-approximate. In particular, we study a weaker version of the algorithm named \textsf{Random Decision Order (RDO)} that in each step, randomly picks an unmatched vertex and matches it to an arbitrary neighbor if exists. We prove the \textsf{RDO} algorithm is $0.639$-approximate and $0.531$-approximate for bipartite graphs and general graphs respectively. As a corollary, we substantially improve the approximation ratio of \textsf{MRG}. Furthermore, we generalize the \textsf{RDO} algorithm to the edge-weighted case and prove that it achieves a $0.501$ approximation ratio. This result solves the open question by Chan et al.~(SICOMP 2018) about the existence of an algorithm that beats greedy in this setting. As a corollary, it also solves the open questions by Gamlath et al.~(SODA 2019) in the stochastic setting.

cs.DS↗