arXiv subjects

Zhi Jin

Publications and source records attributed to Zhi Jin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

An Interactive Agent for Requirement-Driven Candidate Sourcing

Finding people from a natural-language description (``ML engineers transitioning to research roles in biotech'') is increasingly delegated to LLM agents and framed as information retrieval. We argue that it is fundamentally a requirements engineering task: such a request is an under-determined requirement with implicit constraints, many valid answers, and no acceptance criterion, so useful answers require eliciting, validating, and verifying the requirement before search can matter. We present \sys{}, to our knowledge the first interactive, requirements-driven candidate-sourcing agent (it elicits, validates, retrieves, and verifies a vague people-request into a justified slate through bounded elicitation, workflow templates, a two-stage commit protocol, and bidirectional termination guards) and \bench{}, a benchmark that runs the requirements lifecycle (criteria-anchored validation, multi-model evidence-grounded oracle construction, and cost-aware verification). Across $21$ systems and all $691$ requirements, \sys{} dominates breadth ($100%$ coverage at $2.5\times$ the yield) and is \emph{near-orthogonal} to the field, with $90%$ of the people it returns are surfaced by \emph{none} of $20$ strong LLM-plus-web baselines combined. Beyond breadth, an evidence-grounded judging of every system shows \sys{} \emph{recalls} the most relevant real people: $0.241$ of the union pool, $1.9\times$ the next system, with a bootstrap $95%$ interval disjoint from every baseline. \sys{} is thus the strongest \emph{sourcing} engine (the deepest real, reachable candidate pool), while precision-ranking LLMs serve as~complementary verifiers.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

PRAXIS: Graph-Grounded Tacit Knowledge for Domain Code Generation

LLM agents have achieved strong performance on general software engineering tasks, yet struggle with domain-specific code generation. We identify the root cause as the agent's lack of tacit knowledge, including domain-specific business rules, interface contracts, and operational conventions that developers internalize through practice but never document. This knowledge is deeply buried beneath the domain code, dispersed across code entities and their dependency relations, and invisible to the agent that lacks it. These properties make tacit knowledge inherently difficult to retrieve or learn. In this work, we propose PRAXIS, a framework that enables agents to systematically extract, represent, and reuse tacit knowledge for domain code generation. PRAXIS acquires tacit knowledge by simulating human development workflows within the target codebase, distills it into structured units organized on the code dependency graph, and proactively surfaces it to the agent at the point of code interaction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PRAXIS outperforms state-of-the-art agents equipped with powerful agentic search capabilities, as well as experience-based and skill-based methods. The approach integrates seamlessly into various agent frameworks and LLMs with consistent performance improvements, and supports continual evolution with performance steadily scaling as practice accumulates.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Knowledge before Reasoning: EC-Reason-Bench, a Training-Free Diagnostic Benchmark for LLM Enzyme Classification

Enzyme function prediction is a hierarchical, knowledge-intensive form of protein function classification. Existing benchmarks expose an anomaly: general LLMs often get the coarse first level right, yet once asked for a complete EC number their accuracy at levels two through four drops to almost zero, while specialized models and tools stay usable. We propose EC-Reason-Bench, a training-free, diagnostic evaluation protocol built to answer two questions: why general LLMs score close to nothing on EC number prediction, and how much of that loss can be recovered without updating a single weight. We break enzyme classification ability into four orthogonal levers that can each be measured on their own: output structure, external knowledge, reasoning structure, and reasoning robustness. We test each lever with an inference-time method against a shared zero-shot baseline reproducing previously reported near-zero performance. Experiments with several strong reasoning LLMs yield four main findings. First, external knowledge is decisive and must precede reasoning: uniformly low closed-book performance rises sharply with open-book access, narrowing model gaps. Second, in closed-book settings, whether cascading and chain-of-thought help or hurt depends on a model's tendency to abstain. Third, once evidence is available the aggregate score of the best LLM setting is indistinguishable from simply voting the EC numbers of the nearest retrieved neighbors; that tie is an artifact of averaging, and it hides a large gain on adversarial evidence set against an equally large loss on multi-functional enzymes. Reasoning over evidence therefore acts as an arbiter of conflicting neighbors rather than as a source of knowledge, and no single-number leaderboard can see it. Fourth, accuracy obeys a law of homology availability.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

CORE: A Unified Cascaded Ordinal Relevance Estimation Framework for E-commerce Search

Ranking relevance is a fundamental task in e-commerce search, directly affecting ranking quality and consumer experience. Although inherently an ordinal classification problem, it is commonly formulated as conventional multi-class classification, which overlooks the natural order among relevance levels and assigns equal penalties to adjacent and distant misclassifications. This mismatch leads to suboptimal learning objectives for practical relevance evaluation. To address this issue, we propose a unified cascaded binary classification framework applicable to both large language model inference and online BERT-based inference, which reformulates relevance estimation as a sequential decision process and decomposes multi-class prediction into a series of ordered binary judgments from higher to lower relevance tiers. For large language models, we design a step-wise reasoning procedure with pruning strategies and tier-specific reward functions. For the online BERT model, we replace the conventional classification head with multiple level-wise binary classifiers and distill the capabilities of large language models into the online model. Extensive offline industrial benchmark evaluations and online A/B experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework substantially improves relevance performance, reducing the online bad-case rate by 15.94\%. Further analyses suggest that tier-wise modeling is effective for relevance estimation.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation

Large Language Models have emerged as programming assistants. However, the efficacy of code generation is constrained by the quality of input requirements, which are frequently ambiguous, incomplete, or underspecified. While LLMs excel at one-shot code synthesis, their ability to proactively clarify intent remains underexplored, as a critical trait for robust software engineering. Existing benchmarks largely overlook this interactive bottleneck, assuming perfectly specified prompts that do not reflect the iterative nature of requirement elicitation. To bridge this gap, we introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity. Constructed from real-world programming tasks, ClarifyCodeBench features high-quality manual annotations, including N unique ambiguity types, associated clarification questions, and corresponding ground-truth answers. Furthermore, we formalize two rigorous metrics to assess the interaction quality: Turn-discounted Key Question Rate, which penalizes inefficient questioning, and Optimal Round Adherence, which measures the precision of the elicitation process. We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench. Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities; 3) The Multi-ambiguity Ceiling: LLMs' clarification performance degrades sharply as the density of ambiguities increases, revealing a significant bottleneck in handling complex, real-world specifications. Our work underscores the necessity for future AI4SE research to transition from static synthesis to interactive elicitation.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Exploring and Complementing End Users' Requirements in IoT enabled System

End users create IoT automation rules via trigger action programming, but their expressions are often fragmented, capturing device operations rather than high level intents. This gap leads to missing conditions, logical conflicts, and overlooked safety constraints, risking hazardous behaviors. To address this, we propose an intent driven requirements completion approach that reframes rule completion as a dual process: reconstructing intent from fragmented rules, then regenerating rules from that intent, with safety embedded throughout. We introduce a Bidirectional Requirements Traceability Tree, a three layer model linking rules, intents, and quality concerns, and design a multiagent framework that combines LLM reasoning with structured traceability. This enables completions that are both functionally complete and inherently safe, while remaining traceable and explainable. Evaluation shows our method significantly outperforms the baselines, improving the rule completion rate by 43% and reducing logical conflicts by over 21%. By grounding completion in intent understanding, we shift the paradigm from user to system responsibility, and from functional correctness to holistic trustworthiness.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Chiseling Out Efficiency: Structured Skeleton Supervision for Efficient Code Generation

Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating syntactically correct and functionally complete programs, greatly streamlining software development. However, recent studies reveal that these programs typically execute substantially slower than human-optimized counterparts. Existing approaches to bridging this efficiency gap typically involve either iteratively optimizing code after generation or fine-tuning models on corpora of efficient code. Yet, these methods expose the model to efficiency signals only by mimicking complete, optimized solutions, without explicitly encoding the structural code patterns essential for achieving high runtime performance. Addressing this gap presents two core challenges: (1) extracting and representing latent, efficiency-oriented structural patterns embedded within complex syntax and control flows, and (2) effectively learning these patterns without destabilizing the semantic training of LLMs. To tackle these challenges, we propose EffiSkel, an efficiency skeleton-guided framework that explicitly extracts and learns efficiency skeletons-abstract, reusable structural patterns underpinning efficient code-by leveraging three complementary strategies. These skeletons are integrated into a multi-task learning regime that jointly optimizes code generation and skeleton prediction. Experiments across multiple programming languages and benchmarks demonstrate that EffiSkel significantly enhances both functional correctness and efficiency, resulting on Mercury with DeepSeek-Coder (7B) a +11.11% (vs. EffiCoder) and +3.71% (vs. CodeDPO) higher Efficiency Ratio (ER), and a +0.36 (vs. EffiCoder) and +0.22 (vs. CodeDPO) increase in Average Speedup (AS). These results highlight the effectiveness of explicitly modeling efficiency skeletons in improving the runtime performance of code generated by LLMs.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Bridging Requirements and Architecture: Multi-Agent Orchestration with External Knowledge and Hierarchical Memory

Software architecture design is a critical yet inherently complex and knowledge-intensive phase that requires balancing competing quality attributes and adapting to evolving requirements. Traditionally, this process has been time-consuming, labor-intensive, and heavily reliant on architects, often resulting in limited exploration of alternative architectural decompositions and styles, especially under the pressures of agile development. While LLM-based agents have shown promising performance across various software engineering tasks, their application to architecture design remains relatively scarce and requires systematic exploration. To address these challenges, we proposed MAAD (Multi-Agent Architecture Design), a knowledge-driven framework that orchestrates four specialized agents (i.e., Analyst, Modeler, Designer and Evaluator) to autonomously and collaboratively transform requirements specifications into comprehensive, multi-view architectural blueprints with quality attribute assessments. MAAD incorporates RAG to inject recognized architectural standards and patterns into the workflow and leverages a hierarchical memory mechanism that captures design history for iterative refinement. We evaluated MAAD through comparative experiments against MetaGPT, using quantitative architecture-level metrics across 10 case studies and qualitative feedback from industry architects on 10 real-world specifications. Results show that MAAD generates more complete, modular, and traceable architectures than the baseline, and its dedicated Evaluator agent autonomously produces structured quality evaluation reports that significantly reduce manual validation efforts. Furthermore, we found that the quality of the generated architecture heavily depends on the underlying LLM's reasoning capacity, with GPT-5.2 and Qwen3.5 outperforming other models across most evaluation settings.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

On the Road to Personalized Code Intelligence: Portraiting and Assisting Developers Based on Their In-IDE Behaviors

With the advent of large language models, research in automated software engineering has increasingly focused on leveraging these models to achieve a deeper semantic understanding of code or to engineer sophisticated agent-based processes. However, this research trajectory has largely overlooked a critical factor: the developers themselves. Programming is a deeply individualized activity; developers exhibit significant variation in their tool-chain preferences, domain-specific expertise, and problem-solving strategies. Consequently, the current paradigm of one-size-fits-all code intelligence systems struggles to accommodate the needs of individual developers. To address this gap, we introduce VirtualME, a novel IDE-embedded data infrastructure designed to model the developer by continuously capturing and interpreting their dynamic programming behaviors and preferences. VirtualME contains three components. (1) Log-level Behavior Extraction: it captures and extracts developers' log-level behaviors from IDE. (2) Task-level Behavior Recognition: it aggregates log-level behaviors into task-level behaviors via a multi-agent pipeline. (3) Developer-personality Measurement: it builds a rule engine to distill a four-dimensional developer persona: technology stack, ability, behavioral habits, and learning style. On top of VirtualME, we propose a solution for personalized repository-level knowledge Q&A by integrating the developer persona into the Q&A agent. We evaluated VirtualME by building a multi-repository benchmark with real-world developer trajectories, balancing correctness and personalization. Experimental results show that VirtualME-enhanced answers outperform generic baselines on five dimensions, yielding an average 33.80% improvement. Our results demonstrate that abundant, continuous developer-behavior data can pave the new way for adaptive and personalized code intelligence.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

EvoIR-Agent: Self-Evolving Image Restoration Agentic System via Experience-Driven Learning

Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-driven image restoration agent demonstrates effectiveness in degradation coupling scenarios by flexibly selecting tools and determining removal orders. However, their zero-shot planning often fails without experience, necessitating severe trial-and-error overhead to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Currently, two paradigms are employed to address this issue, yet a dilemma persists: Training-based methods embed intrinsic experience into parameters, achieving high inference efficiency but lacking compatibility with new tools or degradation. In contrast, training-free methods utilize explicit experience storage for compatibility but still incur trial-and-error overhead due to naive experience. To resolve the dilemma, we propose EvoIR-Agent, which first systematically formulates the experience components of a training-free image restoration agent. Subsequently, a hierarchical experience pool is constructed, which enables coarse-to-fine guidance for diverse tools and removal orders. Furthermore, a self-evolving mechanism is introduced to update the pool from scratch using accumulated records, thereby greatly improving performance and efficiency. Extensive experiments reveal that EvoIR-Agent achieves a significant lead in the full reference metrics and yields a remarkable Pareto-optimal balance between performance and efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art methods.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

MARR: Module-Adaptive Residual Reconstruction for Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization

Recently, residual reconstruction-based model quantization methods have achieved promising performance in low-bit post-training quantization (PTQ) by introducing cross-layer residuals to reduce error accumulated from previous layers.However, these residuals may also introduce additional bias arising from the Hessian-approximation (HA) assumption underlying reconstruction-based PTQ, leading to suboptimal quantization performance.In this work, we analyze that multiplying the residual term by a scaling coefficient provides a direct way to mitigate the HA bias associated with residual strength, while preserving accumulated-error correction. More importantly, we observe that this trade-off is module-dependent, making a single global residual strength insufficient to balance effective correction and residual-related bias across modules.Based on these observations, we propose Module-Adaptive Residual Reconstruction (MARR), which assigns a module-specific scaling coefficient to adaptively balance accumulated-error correction and residual-related HA bias for each module.To avoid expensive per-module coefficient search and obtain a stable coefficient estimate, we design a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID)-based adaptive update strategy that uses reconstruction error as feedback to progressively refine this coefficient. Experiments on several typical large language models (LLMs) and vision transformers (ViTs) demonstrate the effectiveness of MARR under low-bit quantization (less than or equal to 4-bit), achieving up to 20.2% performance gains on LLMs and up to 4.6% relative gains on ViTs over the residual reconstruction state-of-the-art methods.Code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

From I/O to Code with Discovery Agent

The automatic synthesis of a program from any form of specification is regarded as a holy grail of computer science. Fueled by LLMs, NL2Code has achieved tremendous success, yet the fundamentally more challenging task of synthesizing programs from input-output behavior, which we refer to as IO2Code, remains largely unsolved. Whereas NL2Code can exploit the semantic alignment between natural language and code acquired during pretraining, IO2Code requires recovering underlying principles from concrete computational behavior, navigating a vast and underspecified hypothesis space. To address this, we propose DIO-Agent, a discovery agent for IO2Code. Our method frames IO2Code as an evolutionary search over discrete program space, in which an LLM serves as the mutation operator and concrete error signals from execution guide each mutation. To prevent the search from wandering into structurally complex yet incorrect dead ends, we introduce the Transformation Priority Premise as a mutation prior that biases the LLM toward the simplest hypothesis consistent with current evidence, progressively escalating from constants to conditionals to iteration only when simpler constructs are insufficient. To facilitate systematic study, we further construct an IO2CodeBench spanning multiple difficulty levels. Extensive experiments show that DIO-Agent consistently outperforms both traditional program-by-example method and SOTA evolution-agent baselines across all difficulty levels and various LLMs, while substantially surpassing test-time scaling strategies with equivalent sampling budgets.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

From Chat to Interview: Agentic Requirements Elicitation with an Experience Ontology

Requirements elicitation interviews are crucial and time-consuming in requirements engineering, but heavily rely on the experience of requirements analysts. Although recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have created new opportunities to automate this process, existing approaches rely solely on LLMs for free-form chat without taking into account the interview and development experience. That leads to the omission of implicit requirements and redundant questions. Practically, experienced analysts implicitly follow a structured cognitive framework when conducting requirements elicitation. Inspired by this observation, this paper proposes an interview agent named OntoAgent for the elicitation of requirements guided by an experience ontology. OntoAgent automatically analyzes domain-specific requirements descriptions to construct an experience ontology, which organizes requirements concerns into an ontology to support systematic and explainable interviews. During the interview, OntoAgent first performs four operations (i.e., ParseUser, ScoreOnto, ReRankOnto, GatePrune) guided by the ontology to identify the relevant requirement concerns. The selected concern is then combined with the current dialogue context to generate the elicitation question. To validate OntoAgent, we conduct comprehensive quantitative experiments using the widely adopted website application domain. The results show that OntoAgent significantly outperforms existing baselines in both elicitation effectiveness and questioning efficiency, achieving a 33% improvement in IRE and a 21% improvement in TKQR. Ablation studies further validate the contribution of each key design component. In addition, a qualitative user study demonstrates its practical advantages in real-world scenarios. We believe that OntoAgent can also be extended to requirements interview tasks in other domains.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

ClarifySTL: An Interactive LLM Agent Framework for STL Transformation through Requirements Clarification

Signal Temporal Logic (STL) is a formal language for specifying real-time behaviors of cyber-physical systems (CPS). Automatically transforming natural language requirements into STL specifications has received growing attention. Recent efforts leveraging large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance, but some natural language requirements in practice contain vague or ambiguous information, which remains challenging for LLMs to handle. To address these challenges, we propose ClarifySTL, an interactive LLM-agent framework that enhances STL transformation through requirements clarification. ClarifySTL first detects vague expressions that indicate underspecified information in a requirement. If any vagueness is detected, it generates targeted clarification queries to guide users in supplementing the requirement until all necessary details are provided. Subsequently, if ClarifySTL detects ambiguities, it formulates focused ambiguity clarification queries and updates the requirements based on user feedback until all ambiguities are resolved. Finally, the requirements with vagueness and ambiguity clarified are transformed into STL specifications using LLMs. This interactive framework ensures that the resulting STL formulas faithfully capture user intent while reducing the burden on the user. We evaluate ClarifySTL on the representative benchmarks DeepSTL and STL-DivEn, as well as our newly introduced AmbiEval benchmark, which is specifically designed to assess the performance of the agents in handling vagueness and ambiguity, including both detection and query generation. The experimental results show that ClarifySTL is effective.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

RealBench: A Repo-Level Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Software Development Practices

Writing code requires significant time and effort in software development. To automate this process, researchers have made substantial progress using Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation. Many benchmarks like HumanEval and EvoCodeBench have been created to evaluate LLMs by requiring them to generate code from natural language requirements. However, in enterprise applications and team development, developers typically write code based on structured designs or specifications rather than raw natural language descriptions. This gap between existing benchmarks and real industry development practices means that current benchmark scores may not accurately reflect how much code generation can help automate software development tasks. To address this gap, we propose RealBench, a repository-level code generation benchmark aligned with real-world industry software development practices. Each example includes both natural language requirements and UML diagrams as system design, matching how developers typically receive specifications. Based on the constructed benchmarks, we conduct a systematic evaluation of advanced LLMs' code generation capabilities when provided with structured system designs. The experimental results reveal key insights in current LLMs' capabilities for repo-level code generation aligned with real-world software development practices. First, we notice that regarding repo-level code generation, LLMs show much worse performance and there are significant performance gaps among LLMs. Second, LLMs are good at finding and creating modules defined in UML diagrams, but the quality of generated modules is often poor due to grammar and logic errors. Third, generating the entire repository at once is the best generation strategy on smaller repositories, while generating a complex repository with the module-by-module strategy works better compared to other strategies.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Low Light Image Enhancement Challenge at NTIRE 2026

This paper presents a comprehensive review of the NTIRE 2026 Low Light Image Enhancement Challenge, highlighting the proposed solutions and final results. The objective of this challenge is to identify effective networks capable of producing clearer and visually compelling images in diverse and challenging conditions by learning representative visual cues with the purpose of restoring information loss due to low-contrast and noisy images. A total of 195 participants registered for the first track and 153 for the second track of the competition, and 22 teams ultimately submitted valid entries. This paper thoroughly evaluates the state-of-the-art advances in (joint denoising and) low-light image enhancement, showcasing the significant progress in the field, while leveraging samples of our novel dataset.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Bridging the Gap between User Intent and LLM: A Requirement Alignment Approach for Code Generation

Code generation refers to automatically producing executable programs from user requirements. Recently, researchers have explored approaches to enhance the correctness of generated code with advanced large language models. Although achieving improvements, existing approaches focus on designing reasoning strategies or post-refinement methods to enhance code generation performance. Despite their differences, all these methods share a common assumption: the LLM can correctly understand the given requirement. However, this assumption does not always hold. To fill this gap, we propose REA-Coder, a requirement alignment approach to enhance the code generation performance of LLMs. REA-Coder involves first identifying the requirement content that does not align with LLMs and aligning the requirements. Then, based on the aligned requirements, LLMs generate code and further verify whether the generated code aligns with the requirements, iterating this process of requirement alignment and code generation until generating correct code or achieving the maximum number of iterations. Experimental results show that REA-Coder outperforms all advanced baselines on four LLMs across five programming benchmarks. Concretely, REA-Coder achieves average improvements of 7.93%, 30.25%, 26.75%, 8.59%, and 8.64% on the five benchmark datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of requirement alignment for improving the code generation performance of LLMs.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating the Formal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through Chomsky Hierarchy

The formal reasoning capabilities of LLMs are crucial for advancing automated software engineering. However, existing benchmarks for LLMs lack systematic evaluation based on computation and complexity, leaving a critical gap in understanding their formal reasoning capabilities. Therefore, it is still unknown whether SOTA LLMs can grasp the structured, hierarchical complexity of formal languages as defined by Computation Theory. To address this, we introduce ChomskyBench, a benchmark for systematically evaluating LLMs through the lens of Chomsky Hierarchy. Unlike prior work that uses vectorized classification for neural networks, ChomskyBench is the first to combine full Chomsky Hierarchy coverage, process-trace evaluation via natural language, and deterministic symbolic verifiability. ChomskyBench is composed of a comprehensive suite of language recognition and generation tasks designed to test capabilities at each level. Extensive experiments indicate a clear performance stratification that correlates with the hierarchy's levels of complexity. Our analysis reveals a direct relationship where increasing task difficulty substantially impacts both inference length and performance. Furthermore, we find that while larger models and advanced inference methods offer notable relative gains, they face severe efficiency barriers: achieving practical reliability would require prohibitive computational costs, revealing that current limitations stem from inefficiency rather than absolute capability bounds. A time complexity analysis further indicates that LLMs are significantly less efficient than traditional algorithmic programs for these formal tasks. These results delineate the practical limits of current LLMs, highlight the indispensability of traditional software tools, and provide insights to guide the development of future LLMs with more powerful formal reasoning capabilities.

cs.CL↗