arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Zhenyu Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Zhenyu Chen.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
arXiv2026

Log-based, Business-aware REST API Testing

REST APIs enable collaboration among microservices. A single fault in a REST API can bring down the entire microservice system and cause significant financial losses, underscoring the importance of REST API testing. Effectively testing REST APIs requires thoroughly exercising the functionalities behind them. To this end, existing techniques leverage REST specifications (e.g., Swagger or OpenAPI) to generate test cases. Using the resource constraints extracted from specifications, these techniques work well for testing simple, business-insensitive functionalities, such as resource creation, retrieval, update, and deletion. However, for complex, business-sensitive functionalities, these specification-based techniques often fall short, since exercising such functionalities requires additional business constraints that are typically absent from REST specifications. In this paper, we present LoBREST, a log-based, business-aware REST API testing technique that leverages historical request logs (HRLogs) to effectively exercise the business-sensitive functionalities behind REST APIs. To obtain compact operation sequences that preserve clean and complete business constraints, LoBREST first employs a locality-slicing strategy to partition HRLogs into smaller slices. Then, to ensure the effectiveness of the obtained slices, LoBREST enhances them in two steps: (1) adding slices for operations missing from HRLogs, and (2) completing missing resources within the slices. Finally, to improve test adequacy, LoBREST uses these enhanced slices as initial seeds to perform business-aware fuzzing. LoBREST outperformed eight tools (including Arat-rl, Morest, and Deeprest) across 17 real-world services. It achieved top operation coverage on 16 services and line coverage on 15, averaging 2.1x and 1.2x improvements over the runner-up. LoBREST detected 108 5XX bugs, including 38 found by no other tool.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

ComPass: Contrastive Learning for Automated Patch Correctness Assessment in Program Repair

Automated program repair (APR) attempts to reduce manual debugging efforts and plays a vital role in software maintenance. Despite remarkable progress, APR is still limited in generating overfitting patches, i.e., patches passing available test suites but incorrect. This issue, known as patch overfitting, has become a key concern in the APR community, with numerous approaches proposed to address it. Very recent work proposes a pre-trained language model (PLM)-based automated patch correctness assessment (APCA) approach, indicating the potential of such PLMs in reasoning about patch correctness. Despite being promising, it is still far from perfect due to various limitations, such as the training paradigm and training dataset. In this paper, we present ComPass, a PLM-based APCA approach that leverages contrastive learning and data augmentation to address the technical limitations of prior work. Our work is inspired by the opportunity to integrate contrastive learning with recent PLMs in the field of patch correctness assessment, where large-scale labeled patches are difficult to obtain. ComPass utilizes code transformation rules to generate semantic-preserving code snippets for both unlabeled pre-training corpus and labeled fine-tuning patches. ComPass then pre-trains PLMs with contrastive learning, which captures code features with the same semantics but different structures. ComPass finally integrates representation embeddings of patch code snippets and fine-tunes PLMs with a binary classifier jointly to assess patch code correctness. Experimental results on 2274 real-world patches from Defects4J demonstrate that ComPass achieves an accuracy of 88.35%, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baseline APPT.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

CL4SE: Benchmarking Context Learning on Software Engineering

Context engineering has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for unlocking the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Software Engineering (SE) tasks, enabling performance gains at test time without model fine-tuning. Despite its success, existing research lacks a systematic taxonomy of SE-specific context types and a dedicated benchmark to quantify the heterogeneous effects of different contexts across core SE workflows. To address this gap, we propose CL4SE (Context Learning for Software Engineering), a comprehensive benchmark featuring a fine-grained taxonomy of four SE-oriented context types (interpretable examples, project-specific context, procedural decision-making context, and positive & negative context), each mapped to a representative task (code generation, code summarization, code review, and patch correctness assessment). We construct high-quality datasets comprising over 13,000 samples from more than 30 open-source projects and evaluate five mainstream LLMs across nine metrics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that context learning yields an average performance improvement of 24.7% across all tasks. Specifically, procedural context boosts code review performance by up to 33% (Qwen3-Max), mixed positive-negative context improves patch assessment by 30% (DeepSeek-V3), project-specific context increases code summarization BLEU by 14.78% (GPT-Oss-120B), and interpretable examples enhance code generation PASS@1 by 5.72% (DeepSeek-V3). CL4SE establishes the first standardized evaluation framework for SE context learning, provides actionable empirical insights into task-specific context design, and releases a large-scale dataset to facilitate reproducible research in this domain.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

On the Effectiveness of Code Representation in Deep Learning-Based Automated Patch Correctness Assessment

Automated program repair (APR) attempts to generate correct patches and has drawn wide attention from both academia and industry in the past decades. However, APR is continuously struggling with the patch overfitting issue due to the weak test suites. Thus, to address the overfitting problem, the community has proposed an increasing number of approaches to predict patch correctness (APCA approaches). Among them, locally deep learning approaches aimed at automatically match designs has been emerging strongly. Such approaches typically encode input code snippets into well-designed representations and build a binary model for correctness prediction. Despite being fundamental in reason about patch correctness, code representation has not been systematically investigated. To bridge this gap, we perform the first extensive study to evaluate the performance of different code representations on predicting patch correctness from more than 500 trained APCA models. The experimental results on 15 benchmarks with four categories and 11 classifiers show that the graph-based code representation which is ill-explored in the literature, consistently outperforms other representations, e.g., an average accuracy of 82.6% for CPG across three GNN models. Moreover, we demonstrate that such representations can achieve comparable or better performance for three different previous APCA approaches, e.g., filtering out 87.09% overfitting patches by TREETRAIN with AST. We further find that integrating sequence-based representation into heuristic-based representation is able to yield an average improvement of 13.5% on five metrics. Overall, our study highlights the potential and challenges of utilizing code representation to reason about patch correctness, thus increasing the usability of off-the-shelf APR tools and reducing the manual debugging effort of developers in practice.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Large Language Models for Software Testing Education: an Experience Report

The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into software engineering practice is reshaping how software testing activities are performed. LLMs are increasingly used to support software testing. Consequently, software testing education must evolve to prepare students for this new paradigm. However, while students have already begun to use LLMs in an ad hoc manner for testing tasks, there is limited empirical understanding of how such usage influences their testing behaviors, judgment, and learning outcomes. It is necessary to conduct a systematic investigation into how students learn to evaluate, control, and refine LLM-assisted testing results. This paper presents a mixed-methods, two-phase exploratory study on human-LLM collaboration in software testing education. In Phase I, we analyze classroom learning artifacts and interaction records from 15 students, together with a large-scale survey conducted in a national software testing competition (337 valid responses), to identify recurring prompt-related difficulties across testing tasks. The results reveal systematic interaction breakdowns, including missing contextual information, insufficient constraints, rigid one-shot prompting, and limited strategy-driven iteration, with automated test script generation emerging as a particularly heterogeneous and effort-intensive interaction context. Building on these findings, Phase II conducts an illustrative classroom practice that operationalizes the observed breakdowns into a lightweight, stage-aware prompt scaffold for test script generation, guiding students to explicitly articulate execution-relevant information such as environmental assumptions, interaction grounding, synchronization, and validation intent, and reporting descriptive shifts in students' testing-related articulation when interacting with LLMs.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Enhancing and Reporting Robustness Boundary of Neural Code Models for Intelligent Code Understanding

With the development of deep learning, Neural Code Models (NCMs) such as CodeBERT and CodeLlama are widely used for code understanding tasks, including defect detection and code classification. However, recent studies have revealed that NCMs are vulnerable to adversarial examples, inputs with subtle perturbations that induce incorrect predictions while remaining difficult to detect. Existing defenses address this issue via data augmentation to empirically improve robustness, but they are costly, offer no theoretical robustness guarantees, and typically require white-box access to model internals, such as gradients. To address the above challenges, we propose ENBECOME, a novel black-box training-free and lightweight adversarial defense. ENBECOME is designed to both enhance empirical robustness and report certified robustness boundaries for NCMs. ENBECOME operates solely during inference, introducing random, semantics-preserving perturbations to input code snippets to smooth the NCM's decision boundaries. This smoothing enables ENBECOME to formally certify a robustness radius within which adversarial examples can never induce misclassification, a property known as certified robustness. We conduct comprehensive experiments across multiple NCM architectures and tasks. Results show that ENBECOME significantly reduces attack success rates while maintaining high accuracy. For example, in defect detection, it reduces the average ASR from 42.43% to 9.74% with only a 0.29% drop in accuracy. Results show that ENBECOME significantly reduces attack success rates while maintaining high accuracy. For example, in defect detection, it reduces the average ASR from 42.43% to 9.74% with only a 0.29% drop in accuracy. Furthermore, ENBECOME achieves an average certified robustness radius of 1.63, meaning that adversarial modifications to no more than 1.63 identifiers are provably ineffective.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

SWE-Skills-Bench: Do Agent Skills Actually Help in Real-World Software Engineering?

Agent skills, structured procedural knowledge packages injected at inference time, are increasingly used to augment LLM agents on software engineering tasks. However, their real utility in end-to-end development settings remains unclear. We present SWE-Skills-Bench, the first requirement-driven benchmark that isolates the marginal utility of agent skills in real-world software engineering (SWE). It pairs 49 public SWE skills with authentic GitHub repositories pinned at fixed commits and requirement documents with explicit acceptance criteria, yielding approximately 565 task instances across six SWE subdomains. We introduce a deterministic verification framework that maps each task's acceptance criteria to execution-based tests, enabling controlled paired evaluation with and without the skill. Our results show that skill injection benefits are far more limited than rapid adoption suggests: 39 of 49 skills yield zero pass-rate improvement, and the average gain is only +1.2%. Token overhead varies from modest savings to a 451% increase while pass rates remain unchanged. Only seven specialized skills produce meaningful gains (up to +30%), while three degrade performance (up to -10%) due to version-mismatched guidance conflicting with project context. These findings suggest that agent skills are a narrow intervention whose utility depends strongly on domain fit, abstraction level, and contextual compatibility. SWE-Skills-Bench provides a testbed for evaluating the design, selection, and deployment of skills in software engineering agents. SWE-Skills-Bench is available at https://github.com/GeniusHTX/SWE-Skills-Bench.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

UniUGG: Unified 3D Understanding and Generation via Geometric-Semantic Encoding

Despite the impressive progress on understanding and generating images shown by the recent unified architectures, the integration of 3D tasks remains challenging and largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce UniUGG, the first unified understanding and generation framework for 3D modalities. Our unified framework employs an LLM to comprehend and decode sentences and 3D representations. At its core, we propose a spatial decoder leveraging a latent diffusion model to generate high-quality 3D representations. This allows for the generation and imagination of 3D scenes based on a reference image and an arbitrary view transformation, while remaining supports for spatial visual question answering (VQA) tasks. Additionally, we propose a geometric-semantic learning strategy to pretrain the vision encoder. This design jointly captures the input's semantic and geometric cues, enhancing both spatial understanding and generation. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method in visual representation, spatial understanding, and 3D generation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Spatial4D-Bench: A Versatile 4D Spatial Intelligence Benchmark

4D spatial intelligence involves perceiving and processing how objects move or change over time. Humans naturally possess 4D spatial intelligence, supporting a broad spectrum of spatial reasoning abilities. To what extent can Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve human-level 4D spatial intelligence? In this work, we present Spatial4D-Bench, a versatile 4D spatial intelligence benchmark designed to comprehensively assess the 4D spatial reasoning abilities of MLLMs. Unlike existing spatial intelligence benchmarks that are often small-scale or limited in diversity, Spatial4D-Bench provides a large-scale, multi-task evaluation benchmark consisting of ~40,000 question-answer pairs covering 18 well-defined tasks. We systematically organize these tasks into six cognitive categories: object understanding, scene understanding, spatial relationship understanding, spatiotemporal relationship understanding, spatial reasoning and spatiotemporal reasoning. Spatial4D-Bench thereby offers a structured and comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the spatial cognition abilities of MLLMs, covering a broad spectrum of tasks that parallel the versatility of human spatial intelligence. We benchmark various state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary MLLMs on Spatial4D-Bench and reveal their substantial limitations in a wide variety of 4D spatial reasoning aspects, such as route plan, action recognition, and physical plausibility reasoning. We hope that the findings provided in this work offer valuable insights to the community and that our benchmark can facilitate the development of more capable MLLMs toward human-level 4D spatial intelligence. More resources can be found on our project page.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Diagnosing Quantum Circuits: Noise Robustness, Trainability, and Expressibility

Achieving practical quantum advantage on near-term noisy hardware is a central goal of quantum computation. However, without efficient pre-execution diagnostics, circuit design and scheme selection often rely on costly hardware-in-the-loop trial-and-error, inflating experimental overhead and impeding progress. To address this challenge, we introduce 2MC-OBPPP, a polynomial-time classical estimator that, for parameterized quantum circuits, jointly estimates trainability, expressibility, and robustness to noise. For example, our approach visually demonstrates that moderate amplitude damping alleviates barren plateaus (improving trainability) while decreasing expressibility. Moreover, the method produces a spatiotemporal ``noise-hotspot" map that pinpoints the most noise-sensitive qubits/gates, enabling targeted noise suppression. In a representative circuit, interventions on fewer than $2\%$ qubits reduce the error up to $90\%$. Together, before execution, our approach provides an efficient diagnostic benchmark for circuit/scheme design, and in deployment, guides for targeted interventions that substantially reduce the cost of error suppression.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

ATTest: Agent-Driven Tensor Testing for Deep Learning Library Modules

The unit testing of Deep Learning (DL) libraries is challenging due to complex numerical semantics and implicit tensor constraints. Traditional Search-Based Software Testing (SBST) often suffers from semantic blindness, failing to satisfy the constraints of high-dimensional tensors, whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with cross-file context and unstable code modifications. This paper proposes ATTest, an agent-driven tensor testing framework for module-level unit test generation. ATTest orchestrates a seven-stage pipeline, which encompasses constraint extraction and an iterative "generation-validation-repair" loop, to maintain testing stability and mitigate context-window saturation. An evaluation on PyTorch and TensorFlow demonstrates that ATTest significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines such as PynguinML, achieving an average branch coverage of 55.60% and 54.77%, respectively. The results illustrate how agent-driven workflows bridge the semantic gap in numerical libraries while ensuring auditable test synthesis. Source code: https://github.com/iSEngLab/ATTest.git

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

A Systematic Literature Review on Large Language Models for Automated Program Repair

Automated Program Repair (APR) attempts to patch software bugs and reduce manual debugging efforts. Very recently, with the advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), an increasing number of APR techniques have been proposed, facilitating software development and maintenance and demonstrating remarkable performance. However, due to ongoing explorations in the LLM-based APR field, it is challenging for researchers to understand the current achievements, challenges, and potential opportunities. This work provides the first systematic literature review to summarize the applications of LLMs in APR between 2020 and 2025. We analyze 189 relevant papers from LLMs, APR and their integration perspectives. First, we categorize existing popular LLMs that are applied to support APR and outline four types of utilization strategies for their deployment. Besides, we detail some specific repair scenarios that benefit from LLMs, e.g., semantic bugs and security vulnerabilities. Furthermore, we discuss several critical aspects of integrating LLMs into APR research, e.g., input forms and open science. Finally, we highlight a set of challenges remaining to be investigated and the potential guidelines for future research. Overall, our paper provides a systematic overview of the research landscape to the APR community, helping researchers gain a comprehensive understanding of achievements and promote future research.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Can Distillation Mitigate Backdoor Attacks in Pre-trained Encoders?

Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) has become a prominent paradigm for pre-training encoders to learning general-purpose representations from unlabeled data and releasing them on third-party platforms for broad downstream deep learning tasks. However, SSL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where an adversary may train and distribute poisoned pre-training encoders to contaminate the downstream models. In this paper, we study a defense mechanism based on distillation against poisoned encoders in SSL. Traditionally, distillation transfers knowledge from a pre-trained teacher model to a student model, enabling the student to replicate or refine the teacher's learned representations. We repurpose distillation to extract benign knowledge and remove backdoors from a poisoned pre-trained encoder to produce a clean and reliable pre-trained model. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of distillation in mitigating backdoor attacks on pre-trained encoders. Based on two state-of-the-art backdoor attacks and four widely adopted image classification datasets, our results demonstrate that distillation reduces the attack success rate from 80.87% to 27.51%, with only a 6.35% drop in model accuracy. Furthermore, by comparing four teacher architectures, three student models, and six loss functions, we find that the distillation with fine-tuned teacher networks, warm-up-based student training, and attention-based distillation losses yield the best performance.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Selected highlights from STAR experiment

In this paper, we review recent highlights in heavy-ion collisions and proton-proton collisions at top energies from STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) with key contributions from Chinese groups, including the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) bulk properties, electromagnetic probes, heavy flavor and jets, antimatter hyper-nucleus, nuclear structure, global polarization, and nucleon spin structure. These data serve as important ingredients in the physics of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD).

nucl-ex↗
arXiv2026

May the Feedback Be with You! Unlocking the Power of Feedback-Driven Deep Learning Framework Fuzzing via LLMs

Deep Learning (DL) frameworks have served as fundamental components in DL systems over the last decade. However, bugs in DL frameworks could lead to catastrophic consequences in critical scenarios. A simple yet effective way to find bugs in DL frameworks is fuzz testing (Fuzzing). Existing approaches focus on test generation, leaving execution results with high semantic value (e.g., coverage information, bug reports, and exception logs) in the wild, which can serve as multiple types of feedback. To fill this gap, we propose FUEL to effectively utilize the feedback information, which comprises two Large Language Models (LLMs): analysis LLM and generation LLM. Specifically, analysis LLM infers analysis summaries from feedback information, while the generation LLM creates tests guided by these summaries. Furthermore, based on multiple feedback guidance, we design two additional components: (i) a feedback-aware simulated annealing algorithm to select operators for test generation, enriching test diversity. (ii) a program self-repair strategy to automatically repair invalid tests, enhancing test validity. We evaluate FUEL on the two most popular DL frameworks, and experiment results show that FUEL can improve line code coverage of PyTorch and TensorFlow by 4.48% and 9.14% over four state-of-the-art baselines. By the time of submission, FUEL has detected 104 previously unknown bugs for PyTorch and TensorFlow, with 93 confirmed as new bugs, 53 already fixed. 14 vulnerabilities have been assigned CVE IDs, among which 7 are rated as high-severity with a CVSS score of "7.5 HIGH". Our artifact is available at https://github.com/NJU-iSE/FUEL

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Taming Barren Plateaus in Arbitrary Parameterized Quantum Circuits without Sacrificing Expressibility

Quantum algorithms based on parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) have enabled a wide range of applications on near-term quantum devices. However, existing PQC architectures face several challenges, among which the ``barren plateaus" phenomenon is particularly prominent. In such cases, the loss function concentrates exponentially with increasing system size, thereby hindering effective parameter optimization. To address this challenge, we propose a general and hardware-efficient method for eliminating barren plateaus in an arbitrary PQC. Specifically, our approach achieves this by inserting a layer of easily implementable quantum channels into the original PQC, each channel requiring only one ancilla qubit and four additional gates, yielding a modified PQC (MPQC) that is provably at least as expressive as the original PQC and, under mild assumptions, is guaranteed to be free from barren plateaus. Furthermore, by appropriately adjusting the structure of MPQCs, we rigorously prove that any parameter in the original PQC can be made trainable. Importantly, the absence of barren plateaus in MPQCs is robust against realistic noise, making our approach directly applicable to near-term quantum hardware. Numerical simulations demonstrate that MPQC effectively eliminates barren plateaus in PQCs for preparing thermal states of systems with up to 100 qubits and 2400 layers. Furthermore, in end-to-end simulations, MPQC significantly outperforms PQC in finding the ground-state energy of a complex Hamiltonian.

quant-ph↗
arXiv2026

Collision energy and system size dependence of longitudinal flow decorrelation in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC energies

In heavy-ion collisions, the initial collision geometry and its fluctuations drive the collective expansion of final-state hadrons in the transverse plane. However, longitudinal fluctuations induce event-plane twist and flow magnitude asymmetries, collectively known as longitudinal flow decorrelation. Using a multi-phase transport (AMPT) model, we systematically investigate the dependence of collision energy and system size of this phenomenon with Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 19.6, 27, 54.4, 200 GeV and isobar collisions (Zr+Zr and Ru+Ru) at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV. The results reveal two distinct decorrelation components: $r_n(η)$, which includes flow magnitude asymmetry and event-plane twist, and $R_n(η)$ which arises purely from event-plane twist. Both $r_n(η)$ and $R_n(η)$ decrease linearly with $η$ and exhibit a significant dependence on collision energy and the size of the system. Through the slope parameters $F_n$ in the linear parametrization $r_n(η) = 1-2F_nη$, we can quantify the strength of decorrelation. We further observe that both $F_2$ and $F_3$ demonstrate a pronounced power-law scaling behavior with collision energy, following the relation $F_n \propto log \sqrt{s_{NN}}$. These results provide valuable insights into the three-dimensional modeling of the initial stage and the evolution of relativistic heavy-ion collisions.

nucl-th↗