Zhenjiang Fan | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

When Does Test-Time Search Help World Action Models? An Empirical Audit of Candidate Selection and Simulator Integrity

World-action models increasingly apply test-time scaling, spending extra inference computation on candidate selection and adaptive allocation to improve control. Such gains are credible only when candidates carry exploitable signal, nominal compute savings become real speedup, and evaluation stays reliable. We audit all three on Cosmos Policy and RoboCasa with a premise-first, pre-registered methodology. On clean data, a learned value selector is 1.66 pp worse than random; a hindsight oracle gains only 1.40 pp, with an episode-level interval spanning zero; and 82% of states show identical candidate outcomes, leaving little selection headroom. Token pruning cuts per-forward FLOPs by up to 47% but yields at most a measured 1.15$\times$ end-to-end speedup on the deployed path (1.25$\times$ on a decode-excluded path), short of a 1.5$\times$ target, and our adaptive-allocation experiment is inconclusive under a power gate. We further identify and fix a silent rendering corruption whose rate rises sharply along compute-heavy planning paths while leaving the official direct-policy result unaffected, and release a detector, fix, and scripts. These findings show why test-time scaling should be audited as a chain of premises (decision signal, realized efficiency, evaluationintegrity) rather than by success rate alone. Conclusions are scoped to the tested configuration.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

CALM: A Causal Analysis Language Model for Tabular Data in Complex Systems with Local Scores, Conditional Independence Tests, and Relation Attributes

Causal discovery from observational data is fundamental to scientific fields like biology, where controlled experiments are often impractical. However, existing methods, including constraint-based (e.g., PC, causalMGM) and score-based approaches (e.g., NOTEARS), face significant limitations. These include an inability to resolve causal direction, restrictions to linear associations, sensitivity to violations of the faithfulness assumption, and inefficiency in searching vast hypothesis spaces. While large language models (LLMs) offer powerful reasoning capabilities, their application is hindered by a fundamental discrepancy: they are designed for text, while most causal data is tabular. To address these challenges, we introduce CALM, a novel causal analysis language model specifically designed for tabular data in complex systems. CALM leverages a Mamba-based architecture to classify causal patterns from pairwise variable relationships. It integrates a comprehensive suite of evidence, including local causal scores, conditional independence tests, and relational attributes, to capture a wide spectrum of linear, nonlinear, and conditional causal mechanisms. Trained on a diverse corpus of synthetic data (from linear, mixed, and nonlinear models) and 10 real-world biological datasets with rigorously validated causal relationships, our model ensures robustness and generalizability. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that CALM significantly outperforms existing methods in both simulation studies, achieving over 91% accuracy, and in a real-world application identifying causal factors in Hepatitis C virus progression. This work represents a significant step towards accurate and generalizable causal discovery by successfully adapting the pattern recognition capabilities of language models to the intricacies of tabular data.

cs.LG↗