arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Zheng Fang

Publications and source records attributed to Zheng Fang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Super4DR: 4D Radar-centric Self-supervised Odometry and Gaussian-based Map Optimization

Conventional odometry and mapping methods using visual or LiDAR data often struggle under poor illumination and adverse weather conditions. Although 4D radar is suited for such environments, its sparse and noisy point clouds hinder accurate odometry estimation, while the radar maps suffer from obscure and incomplete structures. Thus, we propose Super4DR, a 4D radar-centric framework for learning-based odometry estimation and gaussian-based map optimization. First, we design a cluster-aware odometry network that incorporates object-level cues from the clustered radar points for inter-frame matching, alongside a hierarchical self-supervision mechanism to overcome outliers through spatio-temporal consistency, knowledge transfer, and feature contrast. Second, we propose using 3D gaussians as an intermediate representation, coupled with a radar-specific growth strategy, selective separation, and multi-view regularization, to recover blurry map areas and those undetected based on image texture. Experiments show that Super4DR achieves a 67% performance gain over prior self-supervised methods, nearly matches supervised odometry, and narrows the map quality disparity with LiDAR while enabling multi-modal image rendering.

cs.RO

ClarifyCodeBench: Evaluating LLMs on Clarifying Ambiguous Requirements for Code Generation

Large Language Models have emerged as programming assistants. However, the efficacy of code generation is constrained by the quality of input requirements, which are frequently ambiguous, incomplete, or underspecified. While LLMs excel at one-shot code synthesis, their ability to proactively clarify intent remains underexplored, as a critical trait for robust software engineering. Existing benchmarks largely overlook this interactive bottleneck, assuming perfectly specified prompts that do not reflect the iterative nature of requirement elicitation. To bridge this gap, we introduce ClarifyCodeBench, a novel interactive benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capability in resolving requirement ambiguity. Constructed from real-world programming tasks, ClarifyCodeBench features high-quality manual annotations, including N unique ambiguity types, associated clarification questions, and corresponding ground-truth answers. Furthermore, we formalize two rigorous metrics to assess the interaction quality: Turn-discounted Key Question Rate, which penalizes inefficient questioning, and Optimal Round Adherence, which measures the precision of the elicitation process. We conduct a systematic evaluation of six state-of-the-art LLMs using ClarifyCodeBench. Our empirical results yield three critical insights: 1) Capability Decoupling: Strong code generation performance does not inherently translate to effective requirement clarification; 2) The Reasoning Paradox: While increased computational thinking enhances code correctness, it yields marginal gains in identifying ambiguities; 3) The Multi-ambiguity Ceiling: LLMs' clarification performance degrades sharply as the density of ambiguities increases, revealing a significant bottleneck in handling complex, real-world specifications. Our work underscores the necessity for future AI4SE research to transition from static synthesis to interactive elicitation.

cs.SE