arXiv subjects

Zhangcheng Qiang

Publications and source records attributed to Zhangcheng Qiang.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Ontology Interoperability: A Comprehensive Framework for Industrial-Scale Applications

Different ontologies with conflicting and overlapping concepts cause havoc in the design, develop, and deploy of ontology-driven applications. In this work, we propose a comprehensive ontology interoperability framework for industrial-scale ontology-driven applications. The framework employs three state-of-the-art semantic techniques in different phases of the ontology engineering (OE) life cycle: ontology design patterns (ODPs) in the design phase, ontology matching and versioning (OM\&OV) in the develop phase, and ontology validation (OVA) in the deploy phase, to achieve better ontology interoperability.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Crowd-OM: Crowdsourcing for Ontology Matching Validation

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) pose new challenges for ontology matching (OM). While OM systems built on LLMs have shown remarkable capabilities in discovering more matching candidates, traditional OM validation that relies on domain experts has become overwhelming. Although crowdsourcing can expose OM validation to large online communities, bias and errors from diverse annotators can reduce the quality of crowdsourcing for OM validation. In this study, we explore the use of crowdsourcing for OM validation and introduce a novel quality assurance crowdsourcing system called Crowd-OM. In order to ensure the quality of crowdsourcing for OM validation, we propose three domain-specific mechanisms, namely differential trustworthiness, coherence pre-filling, and time-dependent modelling. Crowd-OM can be integrated with existing OM systems to enable human-in-the-loop validation. The evaluation shows its effectiveness in handling various annotators and different annotation scenarios. We discuss two real-world use cases and current limitations for improvement.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

OM4OV: Leveraging Ontology Matching for Ontology Versioning

Due to the dynamics of the Semantic Web, version control is necessary to manage changes in widely used ontologies. Despite the long-standing recognition of ontology versioning (OV) as a crucial component of efficient ontology management, many approaches treat OV as similar to ontology matching (OM) and directly reuse OM systems for OV tasks. In this study, we systematically analyse similarities and differences between OM and OV and formalise an OM4OV framework to offer more advanced OV support. The framework is implemented and evaluated in the state-of-the-art OM system Agent-OM. The experimental results indicate that OM systems can be effectively reused for OV tasks, but without the necessary extensions, can produce skewed measurements, poor performance in detecting update entities, and limited explanations of false mappings. To tackle these issues, we propose an optimisation method called the cross-reference (CR) mechanism, which builds on existing OM alignments to reduce the number of matching candidates and to improve overall OV performance.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Ontology-Compliant Knowledge Graphs

Ontologies can act as a schema for constructing knowledge graphs (KGs), offering explainability, interoperability, and reusability. We explore \emph{ontology-compliant} KGs, aiming to build both internal and external ontology compliance. We discuss key tasks in ontology compliance and introduce our novel term-matching algorithms. We also propose a \emph{pattern-based compliance} approach and novel compliance metrics. The building sector is a case study to test the validity of ontology-compliant KGs. We recommend using ontology-compliant KGs to pursue automatic matching, alignment, and harmonisation of heterogeneous KGs.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Agent-OM: Leveraging LLM Agents for Ontology Matching

Ontology matching (OM) enables semantic interoperability between different ontologies and resolves their conceptual heterogeneity by aligning related entities. OM systems currently have two prevailing design paradigms: conventional knowledge-based expert systems and newer machine learning-based predictive systems. While large language models (LLMs) and LLM agents have revolutionised data engineering and have been applied creatively in many domains, their potential for OM remains underexplored. This study introduces a novel agent-powered LLM-based design paradigm for OM systems. With consideration of several specific challenges in leveraging LLM agents for OM, we propose a generic framework, namely Agent-OM (Agent for Ontology Matching), consisting of two Siamese agents for retrieval and matching, with a set of OM tools. Our framework is implemented in a proof-of-concept system. Evaluations of three Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) tracks over state-of-the-art OM systems show that our system can achieve results very close to the long-standing best performance on simple OM tasks and can significantly improve the performance on complex and few-shot OM tasks.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A Systematic Comparison and Evaluation of Building Ontologies for Deploying Data-Driven Analytics in Smart Buildings

Ontologies play a critical role in data exchange, information integration, and knowledge sharing across diverse smart building applications. Yet, semantic differences between the prevailing building ontologies hamper their purpose of bringing data interoperability and restrict the ability to reuse building ontologies in real-world applications. In this paper, we propose and adopt a framework to conduct a systematic comparison and evaluation of four popular building ontologies (Brick Schema, RealEstateCore, Project Haystack and Google's Digital Buildings) from both axiomatic design and assertions in a use case, namely the Terminological Box (TBox) evaluation and the Assertion Box (ABox) evaluation. In the TBox evaluation, we use the SQuaRE-based Ontology Quality Evaluation (OQuaRE) Framework and concede that Project Haystack and Brick Schema are more compact with respect to the ontology axiomatic design. In the ABox evaluation, we apply an empirical study with sample building data that suggests that Brick Schema and RealEstateCore have greater completeness and expressiveness in capturing the main concepts and relations within the building domain. The results implicitly indicate that there is no universal building ontology for integrating Linked Building Data (LBD). We discuss ontology compatibility and investigate building ontology design patterns (ODPs) to support ontology matching, alignment, and harmonisation.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

How Does A Text Preprocessing Pipeline Affect Ontology Matching?

The classical text preprocessing pipeline, comprising Tokenisation, Normalisation, Stop Words Removal, and Stemming/Lemmatisation, has been implemented in many systems for ontology matching (OM). However, the lack of standardisation in text preprocessing creates diversity in the mapping results. In this paper, we investigate the effect of the text preprocessing pipeline on 8 Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) tracks with 49 distinct alignments. We find that Tokenisation and Normalisation (categorised as Phase 1 text preprocessing) are more effective than Stop Words Removal and Stemming/Lemmatisation (categorised as Phase 2 text preprocessing). We propose two novel approaches to repair unwanted false mappings that occur in Phase 2 text preprocessing. One is a pre hoc logic-based repair approach used before text preprocessing, employing an ontology-specific check to find common words that cause false mappings. The other repair approach is the post hoc large language model (LLM)-based approach, used after text preprocessing, which utilises the strong background knowledge provided by LLMs to repair non-existent and counter-intuitive false mappings. The experimental results indicate that these two approaches can significantly improve the matching correctness and the overall matching performance.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

OAEI-LLM: A Benchmark Dataset for Understanding Large Language Model Hallucinations in Ontology Matching

Hallucinations of large language models (LLMs) commonly occur in domain-specific downstream tasks, with no exception in ontology matching (OM). The prevalence of using LLMs for OM raises the need for benchmarks to better understand LLM hallucinations. The OAEI-LLM dataset is an extended version of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) datasets that evaluate LLM-specific hallucinations in OM tasks. We outline the methodology used in dataset construction and schema extension, and provide examples of potential use cases.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

OAEI-LLM-T: A TBox Benchmark Dataset for Understanding Large Language Model Hallucinations in Ontology Matching

Hallucinations are often inevitable in downstream tasks using large language models (LLMs). To tackle the substantial challenge of addressing hallucinations for LLM-based ontology matching (OM) systems, we introduce a new benchmark dataset OAEI-LLM-T. The dataset evolves from seven TBox datasets in the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), capturing hallucinations of ten different LLMs performing OM tasks. These OM-specific hallucinations are organised into two primary categories and six sub-categories. We showcase the usefulness of the dataset in constructing an LLM leaderboard for OM tasks and for fine-tuning LLMs used in OM tasks.

cs.AI↗