arXiv subjects

Zeke Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Zeke Wang.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2020

Optimizing Memory Performance of Xilinx FPGAs under Vitis

Plenty of research efforts have been devoted to FPGA-based acceleration, due to its low latency and high energy efficiency. However, using the original low-level hardware description languages like Verilog to program FPGAs requires generally good knowledge of hardware design details and hand-on experiences. Fortunately, the FPGA community intends to address this low programmability issues. For example, , with the intention that programming FPGAs is just as easy as programming GPUs. Even though Vitis is proven to increase programmability, we cannot directly obtain high performance without careful design regarding hardware pipeline and memory subsystem.In this paper, we focus on the memory subsystem, comprehensively and systematically benchmarking the effect of optimization methods on memory performance. Upon benchmarking, we quantitatively analyze the typical memory access patterns for a broad range of applications, including AI, HPC, and database. Further, we also provide the corresponding optimization direction for each memory access pattern so as to improve overall performance.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2020

Benchmarking High Bandwidth Memory on FPGAs

FPGAs are starting to be enhanced with High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) as a way to reduce the memory bandwidth bottleneck encountered in some applications and to give the FPGA more capacity to deal with application state. However, the performance characteristics of HBM are still not well specified, especially in the context of FPGAs. In this paper, we bridge the gap between nominal specifications and actual performance by benchmarkingHBM on a state-of-the-art FPGA, i.e., a Xilinx Alveo U280 featuring a two-stack HBM subsystem. To this end, we propose Shuhai, a benchmarking tool that allows us to demystify all the underlying details of HBM on an FPGA. FPGA-based benchmarking should also provide a more accurate picture of HBM than doing so on CPUs/GPUs, since CPUs/GPUs are noisier systems due to their complex control logic and cache hierarchy. Since the memory itself is complex, leveraging custom hardware logic to benchmark inside an FPGA provides more details as well as accurate and deterministic measurements. We observe that 1) HBM is able to provide up to 425GB/s memory bandwidth, and 2) how HBM is used has a significant impact on performance, which in turn demonstrates the importance of unveiling the performance characteristics of HBM so as to select the best approach. As a yardstick, we also applyShuhaito DDR4to show the differences between HBM and DDR4.Shuhai can be easily generalized to other FPGA boards or other generations of memory, e.g., HBM3, and DDR3. We will makeShuhaiopen-source, benefiting the community

cs.AR↗

arXiv2019

Accelerating Generalized Linear Models with MLWeaving: A One-Size-Fits-All System for Any-precision Learning (Technical Report)

Learning from the data stored in a database is an important function increasingly available in relational engines. Methods using lower precision input data are of special interest given their overall higher efficiency but, in databases, these methods have a hidden cost: the quantization of the real value into a smaller number is an expensive step. To address the issue, in this paper we present MLWeaving, a data structure and hardware acceleration technique intended to speed up learning of generalized linear models in databases. ML-Weaving provides a compact, in-memory representation enabling the retrieval of data at any level of precision. MLWeaving also takes advantage of the increasing availability of FPGA-based accelerators to provide a highly efficient implementation of stochastic gradient descent. The solution adopted in MLWeaving is more efficient than existing designs in terms of space (since it can process any resolution on the same design) and resources (via the use of bit-serial multipliers). MLWeaving also enables the runtime tuning of precision, instead of a fixed precision level during the training. We illustrate this using a simple, dynamic precision schedule. Experimental results show MLWeaving achieves up to16 performance improvement over low-precision CPU implementations of first-order methods.

cs.DS↗