arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yusufcan Masatlioglu

Publications and source records attributed to Yusufcan Masatlioglu.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Belief Identification in Populations

We study the identification of belief distributions in a population of Bayesian agents from anonymous aggregate belief data. While a single Bayesian agent's full belief can be recovered from beliefs over a suitable collection of binary events, this principle need not extend to populations: event-by-event distributions of beliefs may fail to identify the underlying distribution of priors. We study when this failure is generic and when it is exceptional. Identification is governed by the graph-theoretic structure induced by the observed family of events on the state space. Among $n$-agent distributions, identification is generic if the induced graph is nonseparable, while non-identification is generic if the graph is separable. The results establish both limits and design principles for recovering belief heterogeneity from aggregate belief data.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2026

Decision Making under Dual-System Thinking

This paper introduces the Dual-System Thinking (DST) model, a decision-theoretic framework that integrates psychological dual-process theories into economic modeling. A single cognitive weight parameter governs the relative influence of the automatic and deliberate cognitive systems. Even the simplest form of DST exhibits distinct behavioral patterns, suggesting that the psychological insights of dual-system theory offer a distinct and valuable approach to modeling choice behavior. Empirically, we show that the model can accommodate several empirical findings and outperform well-known models in discrete choice analysis across various contexts. We also apply the model to study optimal list design and rationality in stochastic environments.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2025

Invariant Modeling for Joint Distributions

A common theme underlying many problems in statistics and economics involves the determination of a systematic method of selecting a joint distribution consistent with a specified list of categorical marginals, some of which have an ordinal structure. We propose guidance in narrowing down the set of possible methods by introducing Invariant Aggregation (IA), a natural property that requires merging adjacent categories in one marginal not to alter the joint distribution over unaffected values. We prove that a model satisfies IA if and only if it is a copula model. This characterization ensures i) robustness against data manipulation and survey design, and ii) allows seamless incorporation of new variables. Our results provide both theoretical clarity and practical safeguards for inference under marginal constraints.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2025

Ordered Probabilistic Choice

We introduce a novel perspective by linking ordered probabilistic choice to copula theory, a mathematical framework for modeling dependencies in multivariate distributions. Each representation of ordered probabilistic choice behavior can be associated with a copula, enabling the analysis of representations through established results from copula theory. We provide functional forms to describe the "extremal" representations of an ordered probabilistic choice behavior and their distinctive structural properties. The resulting functional forms act as an "identification method" that uniquely generates heterogeneous choice types and their weights. These results provide valuable tools for analysts to identify micro-level behavioral heterogeneity from macro-level observable data.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2025

Frame-dependent Random Utility

We explore the influence of framing on decision-making, where some products are framed (e.g., displayed, recommended, endorsed, or labeled). We introduce a novel choice function that captures observed variations in framed alternatives. Building on this, we conduct a comprehensive revealed preference analysis, employing the concept of frame-dependent utility using both deterministic and probabilistic data. We demonstrate that simple and intuitive behavioral principles characterize our frame-dependent random utility model (FRUM), which offers testable conditions even with limited data. Finally, we introduce a parametric model to increase the tractability of FRUM. We also discuss how to recover the choice types in our framework.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2025

Revealed Social Networks

The linear-in-means model is the standard empirical model of peer effects and asks that an agent's choice or outcome is a combination of their ideal point and the mean outcome of their group. Using choice data and exogenous group variation, we develop a revealed preference style test for the linear-in-means model. This test is formulated as a linear program and can be interpreted as a condition about differentiating the behavior of each agent in a consistent manner. We then study the identification properties of the linear-in-means model. A key takeaway from our analysis is the close relationship between the dimension of the outcome variable and identification. When the outcome variable is one-dimensional, failures of identification are generic. When the outcome variable is multi-dimensional, we provide natural conditions under which identification is generic.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2023

Coherent Distorted Beliefs

Many models of economics assume that individuals distort objective probabilities. We propose a simple consistency condition on distortion functions, which we term distortion coherence, that ensures that the function commutes with conditioning on an event. We show that distortion coherence restricts belief distortions to have a particular function form: power-weighted distortions, where distorted beliefs are proportional to the original beliefs raised to a power and weighted by a state-specific value. We generalize our findings to allow for distortions of the probabilities assigned to both states and signals, which nests the functional forms widely used in studying probabilistic biases (e.g., Grether, 1980 and Benjamin, 2019). We show how coherent distorted beliefs are tightly related to several extant models of motivated beliefs: they are the outcome of maximizing anticipated expected utility subject to a generalized Kullback-Liebler cost of distortion. Moreover, in the domain of lottery choice, we link coherent distortions to explanations of non-expected utility like the Allais paradox: individuals who maximize subjective expected utility maximizers conditional on coherent distorted beliefs are equivalent to the weighted utility maximizers studied by Chew [1983].

econ.TH↗
arXiv2023

Context-Dependent Heterogeneous Preferences: A Comment on Barseghyan and Molinari (2023)

Barseghyan and Molinari (2023) give sufficient conditions for semi-nonparametric point identification of parameters of interest in a mixture model of decision-making under risk, allowing for unobserved heterogeneity in utility functions and limited consideration. A key assumption in the model is that the heterogeneity of risk preferences is unobservable but context-independent. In this comment, we build on their insights and present identification results in a setting where the risk preferences are allowed to be context-dependent.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2021

Attention Overload

We introduce an Attention Overload Model (AOM) in which alternatives compete for attention, so each alternative's consideration probability weakly decreases as the choice problem expands. This nonparametric restriction has a search-capacity foundation. We identify exactly which preference rankings are compatible with observed choices and establish sharp bounds on latent attention. We then consider heterogeneous preferences in settings where alternatives are presented in a list, establishing nonparametric identification results for attention and the distribution of preferences. We also develop high-dimensional inference and finite-sample methods for these models. Using the travel-mode experiment of Wang and Zhu (2025), we illustrate the methods and find that recovered pairwise preference shares closely match subjects' self-reported rankings.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2021

Correlated Choice

We study random joint choice rules, allowing for interdependence of choice across agents. These capture random choice by multiple agents, or a single agent across goods or time periods. Our interest is in separable choice rules, where each agent can be thought of as acting independently of the other. A random joint choice rule satisfies marginality if for every individual choice set, we can determine the individual's choice probabilities over alternatives independently of the other individual's choice set. We offer two characterizations of random joint choice rules satisfying marginality in terms of separable choice rules. While marginality is a necessary condition for separability, we show that it fails to be sufficient. We provide an additional condition on the marginal choice rules which, along with marginality, is sufficient for separability.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2020

Choice with Endogenous Categorization

We propose and axiomatize the categorical thinking model (CTM) in which the framing of the decision problem affects how agents categorize alternatives, that in turn affects their evaluation of it. Prominent models of salience, status quo bias, loss-aversion, inequality aversion, and present bias all fit under the umbrella of CTM. This suggests categorization is an underlying mechanism of key departures from the neoclassical model of choice. We specialize CTM to provide a behavioral foundation for the salient thinking model of Bordalo et al. (2013) that highlights its strong predictions and distinctions from other models.

econ.TH↗
arXiv2017

A Random Attention Model

This paper illustrates how one can deduce preference from observed choices when attention is not only limited but also random. In contrast to earlier approaches, we introduce a Random Attention Model (RAM) where we abstain from any particular attention formation, and instead consider a large class of nonparametric random attention rules. Our model imposes one intuitive condition, termed Monotonic Attention, which captures the idea that each consideration set competes for the decision-maker's attention. We then develop revealed preference theory within RAM and obtain precise testable implications for observable choice probabilities. Based on these theoretical findings, we propose econometric methods for identification, estimation, and inference of the decision maker's preferences. To illustrate the applicability of our results and their concrete empirical content in specific settings, we also develop revealed preference theory and accompanying econometric methods under additional nonparametric assumptions on the consideration set for binary choice problems. Finally, we provide general purpose software implementation of our estimation and inference results, and showcase their performance using simulations.

econ.EM↗