arXiv subjects

Yunting Yin

Publications and source records attributed to Yunting Yin.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Transfer Learning for Avian Bioacoustics under Sparse Positive Labels

Passive acoustic monitoring is an important tool for biodiversity assessment and wildlife conservation because it supports continuous and non-invasive monitoring of species across large spatial and temporal scales. Robust monitoring remains challenging because many datasets contain sparse positive labels, where species presences may be confirmed while unannotated species cannot be assumed absent. In this work, we study transfer learning under sparse positive labels using BirdCLEF+ 2026 as a target benchmark and BirdCLEF 2021, iNatSounds, WABAD, and BirdSet as external bioacoustic sources. We introduce a multi-source reliability framework that models heterogeneous bioacoustic datasets as distinct supervision sources with differing reliability. Our approach achieves 0.584 macro average precision and 0.860 macro AUC on public BirdCLEF+ 2026 validation labels while outperforming naive source pooling strategies. The strongest gains arise from passive acoustic monitoring datasets and biologically informed source selection. Our findings suggest that transfer learning in bioacoustics is fundamentally a weak supervision and negative transfer problem.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

Interpretable Depression Detection from Social Media Text Using LLM-Derived Embeddings

Accurate and interpretable detection of depressive language in social media can support early identification of mental health conditions and inform timely interventions. In this paper, we investigate the use of large language models (LLMs) and traditional machine learning classifiers for three social media-based mental health prediction tasks: binary depression classification, depression severity classification, and differential diagnosis among depression, PTSD, and anxiety. We compare zero-shot LLMs with supervised classifiers trained on conventional text embeddings, psycholinguistic features, and embeddings derived from LLM-generated mental health summaries. Across multiple publicly available social media text datasets and five-fold cross-validation experiments, we find that zero-shot LLMs exhibit strong performance and generalization in binary depression classification, but struggle with fine-grained severity prediction. In contrast, supervised models trained on LLM summary embeddings often achieve more accurate and consistent performance, particularly for multi-class and ordinal classification tasks. These findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of current LLMs for mental health prediction and suggest that using LLMs as semantic interpreters, rather than solely as end-to-end classifiers, may provide a promising direction for building more effective and interpretable mental health assessment systems.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Debate-Driven Multi-Agent LLMs for Phishing Email Detection

Phishing attacks remain a critical cybersecurity threat. Attackers constantly refine their methods, making phishing emails harder to detect. Traditional detection methods, including rule-based systems and supervised machine learning models, either rely on predefined patterns like blacklists, which can be bypassed with slight modifications, or require large datasets for training and still can generate false positives and false negatives. In this work, we propose a multi-agent large language model (LLM) prompting technique that simulates debates among agents to detect whether the content presented on an email is phishing. Our approach uses two LLM agents to present arguments for or against the classification task, with a judge agent adjudicating the final verdict based on the quality of reasoning provided. This debate mechanism enables the models to critically analyze contextual cue and deceptive patterns in text, which leads to improved classification accuracy. The proposed framework is evaluated on multiple phishing email datasets and demonstrate that mixed-agent configurations consistently outperform homogeneous configurations. Results also show that the debate structure itself is sufficient to yield accurate decisions without extra prompting strategies.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2024

Enhancing Image-Text Matching with Adaptive Feature Aggregation

Image-text matching aims to find matched cross-modal pairs accurately. While current methods often rely on projecting cross-modal features into a common embedding space, they frequently suffer from imbalanced feature representations across different modalities, leading to unreliable retrieval results. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel Feature Enhancement Module that adaptively aggregates single-modal features for more balanced and robust image-text retrieval. Additionally, we propose a new loss function that overcomes the shortcomings of original triplet ranking loss, thereby significantly improving retrieval performance. The proposed model has been evaluated on two public datasets and achieves competitive retrieval performance when compared with several state-of-the-art models. Implementation codes can be found here.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2023

Word Definitions from Large Language Models

Dictionary definitions are historically the arbitrator of what words mean, but this primacy has come under threat by recent progress in NLP, including word embeddings and generative models like ChatGPT. We present an exploratory study of the degree of alignment between word definitions from classical dictionaries and these newer computational artifacts. Specifically, we compare definitions from three published dictionaries to those generated from variants of ChatGPT. We show that (i) definitions from different traditional dictionaries exhibit more surface form similarity than do model-generated definitions, (ii) that the ChatGPT definitions are highly accurate, comparable to traditional dictionaries, and (iii) ChatGPT-based embedding definitions retain their accuracy even on low frequency words, much better than GloVE and FastText word embeddings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Prosody Analysis of Audiobooks

Recent advances in text-to-speech have made it possible to generate natural-sounding audio from text. However, audiobook narrations involve dramatic vocalizations and intonations by the reader, with greater reliance on emotions, dialogues, and descriptions in the narrative. Using our dataset of 93 aligned book-audiobook pairs, we present improved models for prosody prediction properties (pitch, volume, and rate of speech) from narrative text using language modeling. Our predicted prosody attributes correlate much better with human audiobook readings than results from a state-of-the-art commercial TTS system: our predicted pitch shows a higher correlation with human reading for 22 out of the 24 books, while our predicted volume attribute proves more similar to human reading for 23 out of the 24 books. Finally, we present a human evaluation study to quantify the extent that people prefer prosody-enhanced audiobook readings over commercial text-to-speech systems.

cs.SD↗