arXiv subjects

Yulin Yu

Publications and source records attributed to Yulin Yu.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Adoption of Generative AI in the Workplace: Increasing and Shifting the Balance of Productivity and Communication Activity

Generative AI is transforming the workplace by augmenting and automating cognitive tasks, reshaping how organizations work and innovate while raising questions about workplace inequality and the future of work. Despite rapid adoption, empirical evidence on how these tools alter work practices and generate productivity gains remains limited. We examine how AI use affects the quantity and nature of information work using digital trace data from the Microsoft M365 application suite across multiple large international companies. Specifically, we study how generative AI adoption shifts the balance between communication and productivity-oriented activities, such as content creation in Word. Difference-in-Differences analyses show that AI adoption is associated with significant increases in both productivity (21.2%) and communication (7.1%) application actions among users who used the AI system more than 100 times over a 20-week post-adoption period. Among users with 100-500 AI use instances, higher AI usage is also associated with continued increases in both types of activity. The smaller increase in communication represents an overall shift toward individual, documentation-focused work and reflects mixed changes in communication, including decreases in reading and organizing email, compared with more uniform increases in productivity actions. These findings suggest potential efficiency gains and reductions in information overload, while highlighting the need to ensure that AI adoption does not weaken interpersonal communication and the diffusion of diverse information that supports innovation.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

From Searchable to Non-Searchable: Generative AI and Information Diversity in Online Information Seeking

Conversational generative AI systems such as ChatGPT are transforming how people seek and engage with information online. Unlike traditional search engines, these systems support open-ended, conversational inquiry, yet it remains unclear whether they ultimately expand or constrain the diversity of knowledge that users encounter in online search spaces, a primary foundation for knowledge work, learning, and innovation. Using over 200,000 real-world human-ChatGPT interactions, we examine how generative-AI-mediated inquiry reshapes diversity in both user inputs and system outputs through the lens of searchability - whether queries could plausibly be answered by traditional search engines. We find that almost 80% of ChatGPT user queries are non-searchable and span a broader knowledge space and topics than searchable queries, indicating expanded modes of inquiry. However, for comparable searchable queries, AI responses are less diverse than Google search results in the majority of topics. Moreover, the diversity of AI responses predicts subsequent changes in users' inquiry diversity, revealing a feedback loop between AI outputs and human exploration. These findings highlight a tension between expanded inquiry and constrained information exposure, with implications for designing hybrid search and generative-AI systems that better support exploratory knowledge seeking.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Balancing Turnover and Promotion Outcomes: Evidence on the Optimal Hybrid-Work Frequency

Hybrid work policy, especially return-to-office requirements, remains a globally salient topic as workers, companies, and governments continue to debate and disagree. Despite extensive discussions on the benefits and drawbacks of remote and hybrid arrangements, the optimal number of remote days that jointly considers multiple organizational outcomes has not been empirically established. Focusing on two critical career outcomes -- turnover risk and promotion -- we examine how remote work frequency shapes employee trajectories using large-scale observational activity data from a company with over one million employees. We find that increased remote-work frequency is associated with an initial decrease and then an increase in turnover, while promotion likelihood initially rises and then declines. Accordingly, we identify approximately two remote days per week as an optimal balance -- maximizing promotion, a positive outcome for employees, while minimizing turnover, which is undesirable for organizations and may indicate negative employee experiences. These patterns vary across subgroups defined by gender, role type, and leadership status. Several notable results emerge. First, male employees derive greater promotion benefits from remote work than female employees. Second, support workers (non-core business roles) do not experience promotion gains, and the reduction in turnover at their optimal remote-work frequency is marginal compared with employees in core business roles. Third, organizational leaders face greater challenges in remote settings than individual contributors: their turnover risk increases substantially at higher remote frequencies, and their likelihood of promotion decreases as remote frequency rises. We further show that time-allocation patterns partly explain how remote-work frequency influences these career outcomes.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2025

The Persistence of Retracted Papers on Wikipedia

Wikipedia serves as a key infrastructure for public access to scientific knowledge, but it faces challenges in maintaining the credibility of cited sources--especially when scientific papers are retracted. This paper investigates how citations to retracted research are handled on English Wikipedia. We construct a novel dataset that integrates Wikipedia revision histories with metadata from Retraction Watch, Crossref, Altmetric, and OpenAlex, identifying 1,181 citations of retracted papers. We find that 71.6% of the citations were initially problematic and in need of reader-facing repair, defined as those added before the paper's retraction (51.5%) or introduced afterwards without proper warning (20.1%). While many are eventually corrected, our analysis reveals that these citations persist for a median of 3.68 years (1,344 days). Through survival analysis, we find that bot-mediated flagging (RetractionBot), open access availability, pre-existing online visibility (e.g., Twitter/X mention counts), and page-level organization (e.g., number of categories on a Wikipedia page) are associated with a higher hazard of correction. Conversely, a paper's established scholarly authority--a higher academic citation count--is associated with a slower time to correction. Our findings highlight how the Wikipedia community supports collaborative maintenance but leaves gaps in citation-level repair. We contribute to CSCW research by advancing our understanding of this sociotechnical vulnerability, which takes the form of a community coordination challenge, and by offering design directions to support citation credibility at scale.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Signals in the Noise: Decoding Unexpected Engagement Patterns on Twitter

Social media platforms offer users multiple ways to engage with content--likes, retweets, and comments--creating a complex signaling system within the attention economy. While previous research has examined factors driving overall engagement, less is known about why certain tweets receive unexpectedly high levels of one type of engagement relative to others. Drawing on Signaling Theory and Attention Economy Theory, we investigate these unexpected engagement patterns on Twitter (now known as "X"), developing an "unexpectedness quotient" to quantify deviations from predicted engagement levels. Our analysis of over 600,000 tweets reveals distinct patterns in how content characteristics influence unexpected engagement. News, politics, and business tweets receive more retweets and comments than expected, suggesting users prioritize sharing and discussing informational content. In contrast, games and sports-related topics garner unexpected likes and comments, indicating higher emotional investment in these domains. The relationship between content attributes and engagement types follows clear patterns: subjective tweets attract more likes while objective tweets receive more retweets, and longer, complex tweets with URLs unexpectedly receive more retweets. These findings demonstrate how users employ different engagement types as signals of varying strength based on content characteristics, and how certain content types more effectively compete for attention in the social media ecosystem. Our results offer valuable insights for content creators optimizing engagement strategies, platform designers facilitating meaningful interactions, and researchers studying online social behavior.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2024

Exit Ripple Effects: Understanding the Disruption of Socialization Networks Following Employee Departures

Amidst growing uncertainty and frequent restructurings, the impacts of employee exits are becoming one of the central concerns for organizations. Using rich communication data from a large holding company, we examine the effects of employee departures on socialization networks among the remaining coworkers. Specifically, we investigate how network metrics change among people who historically interacted with departing employees. We find evidence of ``breakdown" in communication among the remaining coworkers, who tend to become less connected with fewer interactions after their coworkers' departure. This effect appears to be moderated by both external factors, such as periods of high organizational stress, and internal factors, such as the characteristics of the departing employee. At the external level, periods of high stress correspond to greater communication breakdown; at the internal level, however, we find patterns suggesting individuals may end up better positioned in their networks after a network neighbor's departure. Overall, our study provides critical insights into managing workforce changes and preserving communication dynamics in the face of employee exits.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2024

Does the Use of Unusual Combinations of Datasets Contribute to Greater Scientific Impact?

Scientific datasets play a crucial role in contemporary data-driven research, as they allow for the progress of science by facilitating the discovery of new patterns and phenomena. This mounting demand for empirical research raises important questions on how strategic data utilization in research projects can stimulate scientific advancement. In this study, we examine the hypothesis inspired by the recombination theory, which suggests that innovative combinations of existing knowledge, including the use of unusual combinations of datasets, can lead to high-impact discoveries. Focusing on social science, we investigate the scientific outcomes of such atypical data combinations in more than 30,000 publications that leverage over 5,000 datasets curated within one of the largest social science databases, ICPSR. This study offers four important insights. First, combining datasets, particularly those infrequently paired, significantly contributes to both scientific and broader impacts (e.g., dissemination to the general public). Second, infrequently paired datasets maintain a strong association with citation even after controlling for the atypicality of dataset topics. In contrast, the atypicality of dataset topics has a much smaller positive impact on citation counts. Third, smaller and less experienced research teams tend to use atypical combinations of datasets in research more frequently than their larger and more experienced counterparts. Lastly, despite the benefits of data combination, papers that amalgamate data remain infrequent. This finding suggests that the unconventional combination of datasets is an under-utilized but powerful strategy correlated with the scientific impact and broader dissemination of scientific discoveries

cs.DL↗

arXiv2023

Large-Scale Analysis of New Employee Network Dynamics

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digital transformations across industries, but also introduced new challenges into workplaces, including the difficulties of effectively socializing with colleagues when working remotely. This challenge is exacerbated for new employees who need to develop workplace networks from the outset. In this paper, by analyzing a large-scale telemetry dataset of more than 10,000 Microsoft employees who joined the company in the first three months of 2022, we describe how new employees interact and telecommute with their colleagues during their ``onboarding'' period. Our results reveal that although new hires are gradually expanding networks over time, there still exists significant gaps between their network statistics and those of tenured employees even after the six-month onboarding phase. We also observe that heterogeneity exists among new employees in how their networks change over time, where employees whose job tasks do not necessarily require extensive and diverse connections could be at a disadvantaged position in this onboarding process. By investigating how web-based people recommendations in organizational knowledge base facilitate new employees naturally expand their networks, we also demonstrate the potential of web-based applications for addressing the aforementioned socialization challenges. Altogether, our findings provide insights on new employee network dynamics in remote and hybrid work environments, which may help guide organizational leaders and web application developers on quantifying and improving the socialization experiences of new employees in digital workplaces.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2022

Characterizing the Structure of Online Conversations Across Reddit

The proliferation of social media platforms has afforded social scientists unprecedented access to vast troves of data on human interactions, facilitating the study of online behavior at an unparalleled scale. These platforms typically structure conversations as threads, forming tree-like structures known as "discussion trees." This paper examines the structural properties of online discussions on Reddit by analyzing both global (community-level) and local (post-level) attributes of these discussion trees. We conduct a comprehensive statistical analysis of a year's worth of Reddit data, encompassing a quarter of a million posts and several million comments. Our primary objective is to disentangle the relative impacts of global and local properties and evaluate how specific features shape discussion tree structures. The results reveal that both local and global features contribute significantly to explaining structural variation in discussion trees. However, local features, such as post content and sentiment, collectively have a greater impact, accounting for a larger proportion of variation in the width, depth, and size of discussion trees. Our analysis also uncovers considerable heterogeneity in the impact of various features on discussion structures. Notably, certain global features play crucial roles in determining specific discussion tree properties. These features include the subreddit's topic, age, popularity, and content redundancy. For instance, posts in subreddits focused on politics, sports, and current events tend to generate deeper and wider discussion trees. This research enhances our understanding of online conversation dynamics and offers valuable insights for both content creators and platform designers. By elucidating the factors that shape online discussions, our work contributes to ongoing efforts to improve the quality and effectiveness of digital discourse.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2022

Unique in what sense? Heterogeneous relationships between multiple types of uniqueness and popularity in music

How does our society appreciate the uniqueness of cultural products? This fundamental puzzle has intrigued scholars in many fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, and marketing. It has been theorized that cultural products that balance familiarity and novelty are more likely to become popular. However, a cultural product's novelty is typically multifaceted. This paper uses songs as a case study to study the multiple facets of uniqueness and their relationship with success. We first unpack the multiple facets of a song's novelty or uniqueness and, next, measure its impact on a song's popularity. We employ a series of statistical models to study the relationship between a song's popularity and novelty associated with its lyrics, chord progressions, or audio properties. Our analyses performed on a dataset of over fifty thousand songs find a consistently negative association between all types of song novelty and popularity. Overall we found a song's lyrics uniqueness to have the most significant association with its popularity. However, audio uniqueness was the strongest predictor of a song's popularity, conditional on the song's genre. We further found the theme and repetitiveness of a song's lyrics to mediate the relationship between the song's popularity and novelty. Broadly, our results contradict the "optimal distinctiveness theory" (balance between novelty and familiarity) and call for an investigation into the multiple dimensions along which a cultural product's uniqueness could manifest.

cs.CY↗