arXiv subjects

Yue Zhou

Publications and source records attributed to Yue Zhou.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Towards Vision-Language Geo-Foundation Model: A Survey

Vision-Language Foundation Models (VLFMs) have made remarkable progress on various multimodal tasks, such as image captioning, image-text retrieval, visual question answering, and visual grounding. However, most methods rely on training with general image datasets, and the lack of geospatial data leads to poor performance on earth observation. Numerous geospatial image-text pair datasets and VLFMs fine-tuned on them have been proposed recently. These new approaches aim to leverage large-scale, multimodal geospatial data to build versatile intelligent models with diverse geo-perceptive capabilities, which we refer to as Vision-Language Geo-Foundation Models (VLGFMs). This paper thoroughly reviews VLGFMs, summarizing and analyzing recent developments in the field. In particular, we introduce the background and motivation behind the rise of VLGFMs, highlighting their unique research significance. Then, we systematically summarize the core technologies employed in VLGFMs, including data construction, model architectures, and applications of various multimodal geospatial tasks. Finally, we conclude with insights, issues, and discussions regarding future research directions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive literature review of VLGFMs. We keep tracing related works at https://github.com/zytx121/Awesome-VLGFM.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Blind Compliance: Benchmarking Task Verification in OCR Reasoning

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on OCR-centric document understanding and text-rich visual reasoning benchmarks. Yet existing evaluations largely assume that every task is valid and answerable. In real-world OCR scenarios, this assumption often fails: questions may rely on illegible text, occluded evidence, nonexistent visual targets, contradictory premises, or missing variables. We study this reliability gap as OCR-grounded Task Verification: before answering, a model should determine whether the Image Premise (IP), Textual Premise (TP), and Question (Q) jointly define an executable task. We introduce VeriOCRBench, a 1,800-sample human-verified benchmark built from source images drawn from 8 OCR-related datasets and spanning 8 real-world image domains, with controlled, image-grounded diagnostic tasks. It contains 1,600 trap-injected invalid tasks across 8 trap types and four verification dimensions---Visual, Contextual, Factual, and Logical---plus 200 trap-free controls for measuring over-refusal. Built with a Visual Atomic Fact (VAF)-anchored pipeline and full human auditing, VeriOCRBench enables decoupled evaluation of task verification, root-cause diagnosis, and over-refusal. Evaluating 15 leading MLLMs reveals persistent blind compliance, diagnosis failures, and prompt-induced over-refusal, exposing a critical reliability gap in current OCR reasoning systems. The code is available at: https://github.com/zy001122/Beyond-Blind-Compliance.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

From Uncertainty to Clinical Risk: Severity-Aware Conformal Planning for Interactive Medical Diagnosis

Interactive medical diagnosis dynamically acquires patient information through multiple rounds of questioning, supporting accurate, efficient, and safe clinical decisions under incomplete evidence. Existing methods commonly guide information acquisition with predictive uncertainty or label ambiguity, but overlook the asymmetric clinical risk of missing severe diseases and lack unified long-horizon planning over whether to continue asking questions or commit to a diagnosis. To address these limitations, we propose Severity-Aware Conformal Clinical Planning, which formulates interactive diagnosis as a risk-sensitive sequential decision problem. The framework maintains complementary diagnostic, safety, and masked-evidence beliefs; calibrates turn-specific diagnostic prediction sets and severity-weighted differential-diagnosis risk on held-out diagnostic trajectories; and introduces the calibrated clinical risk into Monte Carlo Tree Search to jointly evaluate long-horizon Ask and Commit trajectories. Experiments on DDXPlus and MediQ show that our method achieves more accurate diagnoses with fewer questions across multiple large language models, while improving differential-diagnosis quality and reducing high-risk errors in severe cases. These findings validate the value of using clinical risk, rather than predictive uncertainty alone, as a planning signal and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework for information acquisition and risk-aware diagnostic decision making. They also motivate future work on clinical-risk-oriented interactive diagnosis and information-acquisition methods.

cs.AI↗