Yue Yang | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Sensing Which Modality Matters: Evidence-Gated Regularization for Robust VLA Policies

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies fuse multimodal sensory inputs, but training on limited and homogeneous robot demonstrations encourages spurious inter-sensor correlations rather than task-relevant signal, a failure we term modality entanglement. Under real-world occlusions and distractors, this manifests as nuisance sensitivity to corruption of uninformative sensors and single-modality insufficiency when only one informative sensor remains intact. We propose Evidence-Gated Regularization (EGR), a modality-agnostic training objective that introduces zero inference-time overhead. EGR derives a per-frame and per-sensor task-relevance signal to gate two state-conditional consistency objectives: invariance on low-evidence sensors, and single-sensor sufficiency on high-evidence ones. We introduce a benchmark based on BEHAVIOR-1K, comprising a fast inference-only diagnostic suite and 47 rollout-based skills targeting modality entanglement. We validate EGR on this benchmark and on two real-robot setups with fundamentally different embodiments: a bi-manual setup with two Kinova arms and three RGB cameras, and a single-arm MELFA ASSISTA setup combining vision and GelSight tactile sensors. EGR improves simulation success rates (SR) from 12.5% to 16.4% under full modalities (+31%), from 9.4% to 16.5% under uninformative-sensor corruption (+75%), and from 2.8% to 6.1% under single-sensor fallback (+120%). Under physical-object distractors, EGR boosts SR from 30% to 85% on the bi-manual setup (+183%) and from 55% to 70% on the tactile setup (+27%).

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems

As large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MASs) are increasingly applied to long-horizon complex tasks, their reliability has emerged as the core bottleneck hindering their real-world deployment. Existing MAS debugging and repair methods typically rely on rerunning and resampling the entire execution trajectory. However, a fundamental question remains to be answered: do these methods causally repair MAS failures or merely stochastically repair by leveraging the randomness of LLM sampling? To evaluate the effectiveness of MAS repair methods, we introduce SymTrace, a controlled evaluation framework that records the MAS execution trajectory and establishes intervention anchors. During replay, it effectively reconstructs the execution before the anchor using recorded logs and only regenerates the downstream trajectory, thereby enabling the reliable reproduction of MAS failures. We further construct the dataset SymFail, comprising 536 human-annotated failure trajectories with graph-linked locations, categories, and trace evidence. Based on these foundations, we conduct a large-scale empirical study across three mainstream MAS frameworks. Our findings reveal that existing unguided rerun methods are highly unreliable, exhibiting low failure reproduction and repair rates (only 67.97% and 6.90%, respectively). Building upon these findings, we further explore the effectiveness of a symptom-driven intervention method, which successfully repairs 20.15% of the failed cases (a 191.89% improvement to state-of-the-art repair methods). This study aims to provide actionable insights for MAS debugging and repair research, paving the way for the robust deployment of multi-agent systems.

cs.AI↗