arXiv subjects

Yu Li

Publications and source records attributed to Yu Li.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Reasoning and Tool-use Compete in Agentic RL:From Quantifying Interference to Disentangled Tuning

Agentic Reinforcement Learning (ARL) trains large language models to interleave reasoning with external tool execution to solve complex tasks. Most existing ARL methods train a single set of parameters to support both reasoning and tool-use behaviors, implicitly assuming that joint training leads to improved overall agent performance. Despite its widespread adoption, this assumption has rarely been examined empirically. In this paper, we systematically examine this assumption by introducing Capability Effect Attribution (CEA), which provides quantitative evidence of interference between reasoning and tool-use behaviors. Through an in-depth analysis, we show that these two capabilities often induce misaligned gradient directions, leading to training interference that undermines the effectiveness of joint optimization and challenges the prevailing ARL paradigm. To address this issue, we propose Disentangled Action--Reasoning Tuning (DART), a simple and efficient framework that explicitly decouples parameter updates for reasoning and tool use via separate low-rank adaptation modules. With this simple change alone, DART outperforms all joint-optimization baselines and approaches the 2-Agent upper bound across thirteen benchmarks on retrieval-augmented QA and NL2SQL, further supporting our finding of capability interference under shared optimization.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

ReactBench: A Benchmark for Topological Reasoning in MLLMs on Chemical Reaction Diagrams

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at recognizing individual visual elements and reasoning over simple linear diagrams. However, when faced with complex topological structures involving branching paths, converging flows, and cyclic dependencies, their reasoning capabilities degrade sharply, even on tasks as basic as counting endpoints. Existing benchmarks fail to probe this gap, focusing on semantic comprehension rather than structural reasoning. We introduce ReactBench, a benchmark that reveals fundamental limitations in structural reasoning through chemical reaction diagrams. These real-world scientific diagrams offer an ideal testbed because they naturally span diverse structures from linear chains to cyclic graphs, while requiring both precise local recognition and coherent global reasoning. Our benchmark comprises 1,618 expert-annotated QA pairs across four hierarchical task dimensions. Extensive evaluation across 24 MLLMs reveals a significant performance gap exceeding 30% between anchor-based tasks and holistic structural reasoning tasks. Controlled ablations confirm this bottleneck lies in reasoning, not perception. These findings expose a fundamental deficit in structural understanding and establish directions for advancing visual reasoning.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

SPARK: Skeleton-Guided Reasoning Synthesis from Large-Scale Scientific Literature

Scientific reasoning remains challenging for open-source models, largely due to the lack of high-quality scientific reasoning data. Existing datasets are often dominated by factual recall or formulaic problem solving, with limited emphasis on mechanism understanding, evidence-grounded reasoning, and hypothesis evaluation. To address this, we introduce SPARK (Scientific Paper Abstracted Reasoning sKeleton), a paper-oriented synthesis framework built on Sci-Base, a large-scale corpus of research papers spanning 10 scientific disciplines. Instead of directly converting papers into question-answer pairs, SPARK treats the claim-evidence-derivation structure of a paper as the fundamental unit of reasoning synthesis. Specifically, SPARK (1) distills each paper into a compact reasoning skeleton capturing its central claims and supporting evidence, enabling self-contained question generation, and (2) synthesizes reasoning tasks from four scientific perspectives: mechanistic reasoning, hypothesis falsification, quantitative derivation, and boundary calibration. A final consistency verification stage further removes unsupported or contradictory outputs. Using this framework, we construct Spark-234K, a scientific reasoning dataset with substantially higher difficulty and diversity than existing resources. Experiments show that Spark-234K consistently outperforms existing scientific reasoning datasets while achieving stronger performance with significantly fewer training samples.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

TrainSDC: Characterizing and Mitigating Silent Data Corruption in Large Language Model Training

LLM training is increasingly vulnerable to silent data corruption (SDC), yet existing protection methods largely treat Transformer computations uniformly because their vulnerability remains poorly understood. We present the first systematic characterization of SDC vulnerability across major computation interfaces in both the forward and backward passes of Transformer training. Our analysis reveals two distinct error propagation mechanisms: forward-pass vulnerability is highly location dependent, with faults on the Q/K path producing persistent training deviations, whereas backward-pass vulnerability is largely governed by gradient exponent distributions rather than computation locations. Motivated by these observations, we propose TrainSDC, a characterization-guided protection framework consisting of Q/K-path recomputation, residual-gain monitoring, and exponent-aware gradient scaling. Experiments on Llama 3.2-1B and Qwen3-0.6B show that TrainSDC maintains training behavior close to fault-free execution under both sparse and dense fault injection while introducing only 1.65%-6.76% runtime overhead.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Semantic IDs: Encoding Business-Value Ranking into Document Identifiers for Generative Retrieval

Generative Retrieval (GR) formulates retrieval as a sequence-to-sequence generation task, assigning each document a document identifier (DocID) and retrieving it through autoregressive decoding, making DocID design a critical factor in retrieval quality. However, existing schemes based on discrete representation learning suffer from inherent collision issues and create a mismatch between the DocID's encoding objective and the system's business optimization target. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{Cluster-Ranked Identifier (CRID)}, which decouples DocID into \textit{semantic clustering} and \textit{business-value ranking}, yielding collision-free identifiers that support incremental updates via intra-cluster reranking. We further introduce an analytical framework that decomposes retrieval gains into \textit{personalized preference} and \textit{statistical prior} generalization, revealing how semantic cluster size governs the balance between the two components. Experiments on a Taobao e-commerce corpus of over 300M items show that CRID surpasses the strongest embedding-based retrieval baseline on top-K Hitrate, and delivers +1.06\% GMV in full-traffic deployment.

cs.IR↗