arXiv subjects

Yingfan Zhou

Publications and source records attributed to Yingfan Zhou.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Learning Password Best Practices Through In-Task Instruction

Users often make security- and privacy-relevant decisions without a clear understanding of the rules that govern safe behavior. We introduce pedagogical friction, a design approach that inserts brief, instructional interactions at the moment of action. We evaluate this approach in the context of password creation, a familiar task with clear quality criteria. We conducted a randomized study with 128 participants across four interface conditions that varied the depth and interactivity of guidance. We assessed three outcomes: (1) rule compliance in a subsequent password task without guidance, (2) accuracy on survey questions tied to password rules, and (3) behavior-knowledge alignment, which captures whether participants who correctly followed a rule also recognized it on the survey. Across the guided conditions, participants corrected most rule violations in the follow-up task and showed high behavior-knowledge alignment. Survey results suggested clearer advantages for some rule types, especially symbol related questions. These results position pedagogical friction as a lightweight intervention for security- and privacy-critical interfaces.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Parameter Identification of a Differentiable Human Arm Musculoskeletal Model without Deep Muscle EMG Reconstruction

Accurate parameter identification of a subject-specific human musculoskeletal model is crucial to the development of safe and reliable physically collaborative robotic systems, for instance, assistive exoskeletons. Electromyography (EMG)-based parameter identification methods have demonstrated promising performance for personalized musculoskeletal modeling, whereas their applicability is limited by the difficulty of measuring deep muscle EMGs invasively. Although several strategies have been proposed to reconstruct deep muscle EMGs or activations for parameter identification, their reliability and robustness are limited by assumptions about the deep muscle behavior. In this work, we proposed an approach to simultaneously identify the bone and superficial muscle parameters of a human arm musculoskeletal model without reconstructing the deep muscle EMGs. This is achieved by only using the least-squares solution of the deep muscle forces to calculate a loss gradient with respect to the model parameters for identifying them in a framework of differentiable optimization. The results of extensive comparative simulations manifested that our proposed method can achieve comparable estimation accuracy compared to a similar method, but with all the muscle EMGs available.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Diff-MSM: Differentiable MusculoSkeletal Model for Simultaneous Identification of Human Muscle and Bone Parameters

High-fidelity personalized human musculoskeletal models are crucial for simulating realistic behavior of physically coupled human-robot interactive systems and verifying their safety-critical applications in simulations before actual deployment, such as human-robot co-transportation and rehabilitation through robotic exoskeletons. Identifying subject-specific Hill-type muscle model parameters and bone dynamic parameters is essential for a personalized musculoskeletal model, but very challenging due to the difficulty of measuring the internal biomechanical variables in vivo directly, especially the joint torques. In this paper, we propose using Differentiable MusculoSkeletal Model (Diff-MSM) to simultaneously identify its muscle and bone parameters with an end-to-end automatic differentiation technique differentiating from the measurable muscle activation, through the joint torque, to the resulting observable motion without the need to measure the internal joint torques. Through extensive comparative simulations, the results manifested that our proposed method significantly outperformed the state-of-the-art baseline methods, especially in terms of accurate estimation of the muscle parameters (i.e., initial guess sampled from a normal distribution with the mean being the ground truth and the standard deviation being 10% of the ground truth could end up with an average of the percentage errors of the estimated values as low as 0.05%). In addition to human musculoskeletal modeling and simulation, the new parameter identification technique with the Diff-MSM has great potential to enable new applications in muscle health monitoring, rehabilitation, and sports science.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2025

Effect of AI Performance, Risk Perception, and Trust on Human Dependence in Deepfake Detection AI system

Synthetic images, audio, and video can now be generated and edited by Artificial Intelligence (AI). In particular, the malicious use of synthetic data has raised concerns about potential harms to cybersecurity, personal privacy, and public trust. Although AI-based detection tools exist to help identify synthetic content, their limitations often lead to user mistrust and confusion between real and fake content. This study examines the role of AI performance in influencing human trust and decision making in synthetic data identification. Through an online human subject experiment involving 400 participants, we examined how varying AI performance impacts human trust and dependence on AI in deepfake detection. Our findings indicate how participants calibrate their dependence on AI based on their perceived risk and the prediction results provided by AI. These insights contribute to the development of transparent and explainable AI systems that better support everyday users in mitigating the harms of synthetic media.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

A Tale of Two Identities: An Ethical Audit of Human and AI-Crafted Personas

As LLMs (large language models) are increasingly used to generate synthetic personas particularly in data-limited domains such as health, privacy, and HCI, it becomes necessary to understand how these narratives represent identity, especially that of minority communities. In this paper, we audit synthetic personas generated by 3 LLMs (GPT4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Deepseek 2.5) through the lens of representational harm, focusing specifically on racial identity. Using a mixed methods approach combining close reading, lexical analysis, and a parameterized creativity framework, we compare 1512 LLM generated personas to human-authored responses. Our findings reveal that LLMs disproportionately foreground racial markers, overproduce culturally coded language, and construct personas that are syntactically elaborate yet narratively reductive. These patterns result in a range of sociotechnical harms, including stereotyping, exoticism, erasure, and benevolent bias, that are often obfuscated by superficially positive narrations. We formalize this phenomenon as algorithmic othering, where minoritized identities are rendered hypervisible but less authentic. Based on these findings, we offer design recommendations for narrative-aware evaluation metrics and community-centered validation protocols for synthetic identity generation.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Can Third-parties Read Our Emotions?

Natural Language Processing tasks that aim to infer an author's private states, e.g., emotions and opinions, from their written text, typically rely on datasets annotated by third-party annotators. However, the assumption that third-party annotators can accurately capture authors' private states remains largely unexamined. In this study, we present human subjects experiments on emotion recognition tasks that directly compare third-party annotations with first-party (author-provided) emotion labels. Our findings reveal significant limitations in third-party annotations-whether provided by human annotators or large language models (LLMs)-in faithfully representing authors' private states. However, LLMs outperform human annotators nearly across the board. We further explore methods to improve third-party annotation quality. We find that demographic similarity between first-party authors and third-party human annotators enhances annotation performance. While incorporating first-party demographic information into prompts leads to a marginal but statistically significant improvement in LLMs' performance. We introduce a framework for evaluating the limitations of third-party annotations and call for refined annotation practices to accurately represent and model authors' private states.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Losing One's Story: How Vulnerable Users Experience Harm in Online Support Seeking

Online support communities are a critical resource for individuals facing distress, stigma, and limited offline support. However, these spaces are not uniformly supportive, particularly for users with little margin for error. In this paper, we examine how vulnerable users experience harm within online support-seeking interactions. Through 25 semi-structured interviews with Reddit users, we show that support seeking is often a constrained practice shaped by structural vulnerability. We introduce the concept of \emph{narrative harm} to describe how participants experience harm through losses of narrative authority, coherence, and space. Their personal disclosures are questioned, reframed, or displaced by others, reflecting asymmetries in voice, credibility, and interpretive power embedded in platform dynamics and moderation regimes. In response, users engage in defensive strategies, including selective self-disclosure, self-silencing, identity separation, and informal mutual aid, shifting the burden of safety onto those already most vulnerable. Our findings highlight how current platform designs insufficiently account for situated vulnerability and redistribute discursive power away from support seekers. We discuss implications for the design of online support systems that better preserve narrative integrity and reduce the burden of safety labor.

cs.HC↗