arXiv subjects

Ying Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Ying Liu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Adaptive Fused Prior Transfer for Controllable Generative Image Compression

Learned image compression achieves competitive rate-distortion performance, but very-low-bitrate reconstruction remains challenging because the transmitted representation cannot preserve fine textures and local structures. Perceptual and generative codecs synthesize missing details using reconstruction priors, while controllable codecs allow one model to cover different bitrate and reconstruction preferences. However, existing codebook-based controllable designs generally rely on single-codebook reconstruction priors. We propose Adaptive Fused Prior Transfer for Controllable Generative Image Compression (AFP-GIC), a controllable codec that transfers an adaptive fused prior from a frozen pretrained AdaCode model. Encoder-side fused-prior features guide latent formation, while the decoder predicts a compatible fused prior from the compressed representation and selected control variables, enabling prior-guided reconstruction without transmitting the fused prior itself. A motivating analysis shows that better decoder-side fused-prior alignment tightens a reconstruction-error upper bound and that the fused-prior family contains single-codebook choices as special cases. Under the unified benchmark, AFP-GIC achieves 18.1% lower decoder latency and uses 31.10 million (20.5%) fewer inference parameters than DC-VIC. Experiments on Kodak, CLIC2020, and DIV2K show competitive PSNR and SSIM, with the clearest perceptual gains in NIQE scores and very-low-bitrate visual comparisons.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2026

READY or Not: Reliable Enterprise Agent Deployment

An AI agent can perform well on benchmarks and still be unsuitable for deployment. Existing AI-agent benchmarks measure whether an agent can complete realistic professional work, whereas enterprise deployment asks a different question: whether an agent can meet a required reliability level, under acceptable human oversight, and at tolerable cost. We introduce Reliable Enterprise Agent Deployment (READY), a framework for qualifying AI agents for deployment on enterprise workflows. READY preserves each workflow's own definition of successful execution while applying a common qualification procedure. Given an agent, a workflow, and a class of candidate oversight policies, READY measures the reliability and operating cost of the human-AI system, selects the minimum-cost policy that satisfies a specified reliability target, and statistically qualifies it on held-out cases. The resulting deployment profile characterizes the supported operating point: reliability, human-oversight burden, and cost. READY is implemented as an open testbed that decouples workflow specification, execution, evaluation, and qualification, and runs on existing agent-evaluation infrastructure. In an end-to-end clinical-audit case study spanning 16 agent systems and 750 cases, READY reveals differences hidden by autonomous performance: two systems separated by only 0.3 points in autonomous accuracy (72.8% vs. 72.5%) require 39.2% versus 29.6% human review, respectively, to qualify at the same 76% reliability target under the evaluated oversight policy. READY thus shifts enterprise agent evaluation from how well can the agent perform the work? to under what conditions, and at what cost, can it be reliably deployed? By making those conditions explicit and statistically testable, READY provides a basis for comparing agent systems, setting oversight requirements, and making evidence-based deployment decisions.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Learning to Look Again: Loss-Gap Supervision for Free-form Crop Routing in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) fail many detail-centric questions for a concrete reason: the answer is visible in the image, yet lost after the image is compressed into a low-resolution global view. Allocating more visual tokens to every query improves some OCR and document cases, but it spends computation indiscriminately and can disturb tasks that rely on global context. We propose GapSight, a framework for learning visual re-reading: a VLM first takes a global glance, then selectively returns to a free-form region when the question calls for local evidence. The supervision comes from the target model's own failure signal. Offline, we compare answer loss or multiple-choice option margin under a global-only view and candidate crop-augmented views; crops that improve the target answer become model-specific review labels. A lightweight free-form crop router distills these labels into a one-shot inference policy that predicts whether to review, expected utility, and a continuous crop box from the global state. Across LLaVA-1.5-7B, InternVL2.5-8B, and Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct, GapSight improves the Base no-zoom baseline on six benchmarks spanning OCR, documents, charts, infographics, VStarBench, and MME-RealWorld-Lite. On InternVL2.5-8B, GapSight raises the six-benchmark average from 52.25 to 64.29, above CropVLM (57.16), ViCrop (55.84), and ZoomRefine (54.43). Mechanism analyses show that the router rescues concrete wrong answers, adapts its action rate by task, and forms a favorable token-performance profile. These results position loss-gap supervision as a practical route to teaching VLMs when and where to look again.

cs.CV↗