arXiv subjects

Yiming Gai

Publications and source records attributed to Yiming Gai.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ExplainRoute: A Pre-Deployment Audit Framework for Non-Answer-Giving Programming Tutors

Programming tutors should support learners' own explanations rather than immediately providing model answers. We present ExplainRoute, a pre-deployment audit framework for non-answer-giving programming tutors. Given a code line and a learner explanation, it estimates the explanation state and selects one of two bounded responses: a Feynman-style self-explanation prompt or a Socratic scaffold. The framework exposes its state, strategy, cited code fragment, and leakage risk through a machine-checkable contract. Unlike benchmarks that rank tutors by fluency alone, ExplainRoute audits information boundaries, response polarity, failure closure, and the value of learner-explanation visibility before classroom deployment. We evaluate it offline on the 1,770-pair SelfCode corpus using a code-group split, with 443 pairs reserved in 11 untouched holdout groups. The evaluation compares direct answers, fixed open self-explanation, fixed Socratic scaffolding, adaptive routing, and an adaptive no-state ablation. Contract validity reaches 100% for all pedagogical conditions. Adaptive routing matches the frozen reference rule on 60.5% of records, with state macro-F1 of 0.238 (Open: 0.229; Socratic: 0.246), showing no reliable adaptive advantage. An independent language-model judge scores adaptive responses 4.516/5, outperforming the no-state ablation (2.819/5) but slightly below fixed open self-explanation (4.598/5) and Socratic scaffolding (4.658/5). A blinded rubric evaluation on a stratified 40-row subset confirms that visible learner explanations improve information value while adaptive routing does not outperform fixed strategies. The contribution is a validated audit protocol and a boundary finding, rather than evidence of improved learning, retention, or causal instructional effectiveness.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Model Responses: A Multi-Factor Scoring System

The remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in linguistic tasks underscores an urgent need for comprehensive evaluation of their response quality. Prevailing methods, often confined to singular dimensions, fall short of capturing the full spectrum of model capabilities. This study introduces a multifactor scoring paradigm, integrating accuracy, conciseness, factual consistency, readability, and coherence, complemented by a graphical user interface (GUI) for visualizing outcomes. Evaluations on the TruthfulQA dataset unveil mainstream LLMs' strengths in reasoning tasks (peaking at a composite score of 0.6104) alongside pervasive limitations in navigating complex facts and ambiguities. Transcending the narrow lens of traditional metrics, this framework offers a transparent, adaptable avenue to illuminate model potential and deficiencies. Though presently focused on English tasks, its horizons beckon toward multilingual domains. This work carves a novel path for knowledge engineering and model refinement.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Modality Relevance is not Modality Utility: Post-hoc Selective Modality Escalation for Cost-Aware Multimodal RAG

Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds a generator in evidence drawn from heterogeneous modalities -- text, tables, and images. The dominant deployment choice is binary and made before the model has tried to answer: either run a cheap text(+table) pipeline, or pay for an expensive vision-language model (VLM) over every image. Recent adaptive systems improve on this by selecting the modality or fidelity pre-retrieval, from a question-conditioned predictor of which modality will be needed. We show that this is the wrong decision point. Through an oracle headroom analysis on MultiModalQA, we find that the relevance of a modality to a question is a weak predictor of whether that modality is actually needed to answer correctly: a large fraction of questions whose gold support includes an image are nonetheless answerable from text and tables alone, and a pre-retrieval router that escalates on apparent visual relevance over-escalates substantially relative to an oracle. We propose \textbf{post-hoc selective modality escalation}: answer cheaply from text and tables, run a verifier on the (query, draft answer, evidence) tuple that localizes which modality is missing, and pay for VLM evidence only there. A calibrated value-of-escalation router then decides whether the expected accuracy gain justifies the visual cost. On MultiModalQA, our router recovers the accuracy of an always-on VLM pipeline while issuing far fewer visual calls, and closes most of the gap to the oracle escalation rate. The result extends a routing-signal hierarchy established for retrieval depth and reasoning hops to a third axis -- modality -- under a single cost-aware selective-escalation view.

cs.IR↗