arXiv subjects

Yibo Meng

Publications and source records attributed to Yibo Meng.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Navigating Deception on Gay Dating Apps: A Qualitative Study of Users' Experiences, Verification Strategies, and Community Knowledge in China

Gay dating applications have become essential platforms for sexual minority men to seek relationships, intimacy, and community, yet they also expose users to a range of deceptive interactions that remain underexplored in HCI and CSCW research. This study examines how gay male users in China experience, identify, and respond to deception on dating applications. Through semi-structured interviews with 22 participants who used platforms such as Blued, Aloha, Fanka, and Soul, we identify a typology of deceptive practices that users encounter, including relational misrepresentation for sexual access, sustained emotional deception, financial fraud, marketing behavior disguised as ordinary users, and false identity construction. We further analyze the verification and coping strategies that users develop through long-term platform use, such as judging relational intent through interactional pace, identifying financial risk signals, recognizing commercial promotion accounts, and progressively verifying identity authenticity. Finally, we show that risk recognition is not merely an individual capacity but a collaborative practice that gradually emerges through the circulation of experience within the community, the summarization of recurrent deceptive tactics, and the learning of shared rules. Our findings contribute to CSCW scholarship by demonstrating how users of a marginalized community collectively construct practical knowledge about deception, and by revealing that trust assessment on dating platforms operates as a layered, probabilistic, and socially distributed process rather than a binary judgment.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

"You Already Have Me--Why Do You Still Use Blued?" How Gay Dating Apps Shape Intimate Relationships Among Chinese Gay Men

Gay dating applications such as Blued are widely used for meeting partners, yet their role does not end once an intimate relationship is formed. When these platforms persist within an established relationship, they transform from matchmaking tools into a form of relational infrastructure that both partners must continuously manage. Building on existing CSCW and HCI research that has primarily examined how social media triggers jealousy, surveillance, or trust issues in intimate relationships, this study investigates how the persistent presence of gay dating applications shapes the dynamics of intimate relationships among Chinese gay men. Through semi-structured interviews with 23 self-identified gay men aged 19 to 55, we identify a recurring cyclical process: platform signals-such as online status, profile updates, distance indicators, and usage records-trigger suspicion and conflict; partners invest negotiation labor through intent explanation, visibility control, rule formation, or silence; and these negotiations eventually sediment into temporary governance settlements that reduce trigger frequency but remain conditionally stable. We identify four types of governance settlements: infrastructure removal, transparency governance, silence agreements, and layered/open agreements. Each settlement addresses the governance problems of platform presence, visibility distribution, and loyalty boundaries differently, yet none achieves permanent stability due to platforms' reversible entry mechanisms and continuous visibility cues. Our findings extend existing CSCW research on digital technology and intimate relationships by revealing a more complex process than previously documented: platform signals not only trigger emotional responses but prompt partners to engage in sustained relational negotiation through explanation, visibility management, rule formation, or silence.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care

Terminally ill patients generate extensive digital health data through hospital portals, physiological monitoring devices, consumer health applications, and end-of-life care platforms. Yet their ability to control this data is systematically undermined by the structural conditions of terminal care. Through semi-structured in-depth interviews with 21 terminally ill patients, 11 family caregivers, and 8 physicians recruited from tertiary hospitals, this study examines the digital privacy circumstances and subjective attitudes of patients in end-of-life contexts. Thematic analysis reveals five structural dimensions of digital privacy challenge: continuous bodily digitization without meaningful informed consent; cognitive decline driving involuntary proxy control of accounts; inferential data generation exceeding patients' epistemic boundaries; dissolution of individual privacy boundaries amid relational network restructuring; and the absence of institutional governance over post-mortem data. Patient privacy attitudes span three profiles: fundamental absence of privacy awareness, sustained active management under severe tool constraints, and perception of problems followed by resigned abandonment. Interviews with caregivers and physicians reveal benevolent substitution in the name of care needs, expansion of access beyond the initial task, and unresolved boundaries under absent institutional guidance. These findings reveal a compounding privacy vulnerability unique to end-of-life contexts and call for privacy-by-design principles, granular permission mechanisms, and institutional governance frameworks tailored to the needs of dying patients.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

From Neglect to Resignation: Understanding the Evolution of Mobile Privacy

This decade-long longitudinal qualitative study follows 31 smartphone users in China across four interview waves (2014-2023) to examine how mobile privacy understanding evolves alongside shifting computing infrastructures. Findings reveal three stages shaped by distinct interactional mechanisms: early functional acceptance of permission-based data access, growing vigilance triggered by behavioral tracking feedback loops, and eventual resignation as AI-driven inference made ecosystem-level profiling feel inescapable. Rather than a stable attitude, digital resignation emerges through cumulative infrastructure exposure, as each new system layer retroactively reinterpreted earlier permissions and exhausted users' capacity for self-management. The study challenges permission-centric design assumptions and proposes inference visibility, context isolation, and automated privacy agency as system-level responses.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

When Ubiquitous Health Data Stops Helping: Patients' Experience of Breakdowns in the Data-Interpretation-Action Loop at the End of Life

Ubiquitous computing systems in healthcare often assume that greater data visibility improves awareness, interpretation, and action. In end-of-life care, however, this assumption warrants scrutiny. Through semi-structured interviews with 25 terminal-stage patients as primary informants and 8 clinicians as supplementary informants, we examine patients' descriptions of how they encountered, interpreted, acted on, and disengaged from state signals, trajectories, algorithmic outputs, and behavioral audits. Our analysis identifies three recurrent patterns in these descriptions. First, participants described repeated and unresolved sensemaking when visible data lacked explanatory pathways. Second, they described outputs they could understand but whose suggested actions did not fit their changing bodily capacities, care goals, or decision-making roles. Third, they described difficulty disengaging when data remained embedded across care environments. Rather than rejecting data altogether, patients called for less data exposure and a reorientation toward existential support. Based on this analysis, we situate data exposure as a central interaction problem in end-of-life ubiquitous computing and derive design implications for interpretive stability, care-context alignment, and existential support.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

"Can Computing Systems Eventually Disappear?": A Long-Term Tracking Study on the Use of Diabetes Computing Systems by Patients with Diabetes

Ubiquitous computing has long pursued Weiser's vision of technologies that "disappear" into everyday life. As wearable health systems advance, they increasingly substitute for rather than scaffold users' judgment, yet the long-term consequences remain underexplored. We report an eight-year, five-wave longitudinal interview study from 2017 to 2025 with 37 patients with diabetes, complemented by interviews with 15 clinicians, designers, and vendors. Across three technological generations including glucometers, continuous glucose monitoring, and predictive and automated insulin delivery systems, we identify a novel user state, continued use with cognitive disengagement. In this state, devices remain in use but active interpretation and questioning recede, leaving users to respond only to alarms. This state emerges from functional expansion, delegation of interpretive authority, and information fatigue, and is reinforced by clinical prioritization, information compression, and automation. It results in less frequent independent health judgment and a shift from understanding to responding. We argue that future diabetes computing systems should reduce unnecessary cognitive work while preserving users' opportunities to interpret, contextualize, and question system outputs.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

From Prefabricated Content to Situated Generation: A Four-Wave Longitudinal Study of AI-Mediated Museum Surfaces and Spaces

Generative AI changes a basic condition of interactive surfaces and spaces (ISS): visitor-facing content can be produced during interaction rather than fully authored before it. We report a longitudinal qualitative study with 23 Chinese science museum practitioners, interviewed annually from 2023 to 2026 (retention 23 to 19) and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Participants' accounts moved from anticipated epistemic and operational risks, through backstage experimentation and visitor-facing trials, toward situated governance and renewed questions about the purpose of museum interaction. Following these changes over time shows how generative AI reconfigured the design problems of museum ISS: generated content appeared under institutional authority; inference delay became publicly and bodily experienced; concurrent touch, gesture, and speech created ambiguous multi-user intent; and post-generation editing could leave curators selecting within an AI-defined possibility space. We conceptualize the resulting shift as a movement from prefabricated display to situated generation and formulate four design propositions concerning provenance at the point of display, spatially appropriate fallback, multi-intent negotiation, and curatorial control before generation. These propositions are grounded in practitioner accounts rather than evaluations of implemented solutions.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Sensory Comfort Across Multisensory XR Prototypes for Autistic Adults

Multisensory XR may support informal learning for autistic adults, but sensory-friendly design often emphasizes reducing input. We conducted a mixed-methods, counterbalanced within-subjects study with 20 Chinese autistic adults who evaluated five complete XR configurations presenting the same popular-science content. Comfort differed substantially across the configurations (Friedman chi-square(4) = 46.39, p < .001, Kendall's W = .58). L3 received the lowest mean rating (2.97/5) and was tied for lowest for 16/20 participants, whereas L5 received the highest mean rating (4.43/5) and was tied for highest for 17/20. Participants described the static configurations in terms of clarity and self-pacing, L3 in terms of abruptness, simultaneous demands, insufficient warning, and limited disengagement, and L4/L5 in terms of gradual transitions, opportunities to disengage, and coordinated narrative cues. The study provides a configuration-level account of sensory comfort and identifies participant-described qualities that can inform future controlled studies of multisensory XR.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

When Data Becomes Judgment: Misaligned Interpretations and Accountability in Food Delivery Platforms

Food delivery platforms mediate service encounters through real-time tracking data. While presented as objective, such data often obscures the situational constraints shaping delivery work, producing systematic misalignments between user perception and courier experience. This study presents a socio-technical analysis of real-time mobile tracking systems in the wild. Through semi-structured interviews with 23 users and 17 couriers on Chinese food delivery platforms, we identify two interrelated dynamics. First, users operate within a data-as-behavior interpretive framework, translating spatial and temporal anomalies into moralized judgments of courier negligence. Second, couriers engage in anticipatory data management, a form of hidden digital labor in which they reshape their physical behavior to produce interface-legible trajectories rather than physically optimal ones. Together, these findings expose a burden-shifting mechanism---characterizing the systemic outcomes of decontextualized interface design rather than explicit designer intent---in current tracking architectures, demonstrating how current tracking architectures leave gig workers bearing much of the explanatory burden. We propose design directions toward contextual transparency, redistributing this explanatory burden from individual workers to the platforms that possess the logistical context to bear it.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Where Does the Human End? Creative Agency with Generative AI across Five Years of Chinese Digital Painting

As generative AI enters creative work, practitioners must decide where AI assistance ends and human authorship begins. Human-agent interaction (HAI) research has examined AI as a tool, collaborator, consultant, and competitor. The longitudinal problem is how these roles are revised as systems become more capable, public, and economically embedded. We report a five-year interview study with 17 Chinese digital painters, based on annual semi-structured interviews from 2021 to 2025. Participants described recurring but non-uniform patterns of protective resistance, pragmatic task delegation, and, for some, reflective agency repartitioning. Early resistance protected observation, originality, signature, and ownership from AI. Later delegation placed AI in bounded tasks such as references, backgrounds, rough sketches, and client-facing drafts. By 2025, some participants built hybrid workflows around human-only zones, while others described fatigue, precarity, or difficulty locating a remaining human role. Peer norms, emotional climates, and production pressures shaped which delegations felt useful, acceptable, or exhausting. Copyright, authorship, and creative labor remained recurring limits on what participants were willing to delegate. We frame these accounts as longitudinal agency partitioning, the situated work of deciding which stages, responsibilities, values, and claims remain human in creative human-agent interaction. We discuss design implications for revisable agency-boundary controls, provenance scaffolds, and community-facing authorship norms.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Using Grounded Theory for Agent Behavior Analysis at Scale

Understanding agent behavior requires methods that scale to thousands of trajectories and surface new patterns in long, often unfamiliar tasks where pre-built classifiers fall short. We propose to bring grounded theory into agent trajectory analysis: a six-decade-old qualitative method from the social sciences, with a principled saturation criterion and an auditable trail from data to theory. We propose AutoTraceGT (Automated Trace analysis through Grounded Theory), the first multi-agent pipeline that automates grounded theory on agent trajectories. It iteratively performs open, axial, and theoretical coding until saturation, producing a behavioral taxonomy tailored to each task. Across six trajectory corpora, AutoTraceGT produces codebooks that recover 73-91 percent of the failure modes in human-annotated taxonomies and surface additional patterns that those taxonomies miss. The emergent theoretical narrative aligns with prior expert accounts. Used as a deductive feature space, the codebook outperforms zero-shot and few-shot LLM baselines on downstream failure prediction. These results suggest Grounded Theory offers a scalable analytic tool for ML researchers and agent developers studying what agents actually do.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Balancing Safety and Autonomy: Accessibility-Oriented Interventions in Generative AI for Cognitive Impairment

Generative AI systems are increasingly used by older adults with cognitive impairment for everyday tasks such as information seeking, health management, and communication. While these systems provide flexible, language-based support, their open-ended outputs introduce risks of over-reliance, misinterpretation, and inappropriate decision-making. Prior work has focused on usability and adoption, with limited attention to how system design shapes users' participation in decision-making and the distribution of agency in care contexts. We present a qualitative study of 45 individuals with cognitive impairment and their caregivers. We identify five accessibility-oriented mechanisms: AI Capability Constraint, Human Oversight Embedding, Cognitive Engagement Maintenance, Human-AI Relationship Regulation, and Risk Transparency and Control, through which systems structure interaction. These mechanisms both support and constrain users by redistributing decision-making across users and caregivers. We show that their effects vary by impairment level: while protective mechanisms support users with severe impairment, they can restrict autonomy for those with mild impairment. As impairment progresses, tensions become less visible as user participation diminishes. Our findings highlight the need for dynamic designs that balance safety and autonomy in AI-supported care.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Wearing Trust: How Older Adults Calibrate Reliance on Health Wearables Through Bodily Experience and Everyday Use

Older adults increasingly use health wearables, yet often cannot inspect the properties that matter for reliance. Through 31 semi-structured interviews in China, we examined how participants judged whether wearable outputs were reliable enough for everyday use. Participants relied on brand and price, visible interface activity, lived interaction experience, and comparison with bodily sensation. These cues supported conditional trust, but did not reveal sensor validity, data continuity, or failure conditions. We describe this mismatch as an observability gap and outline design directions for showing signal quality, reliability by context, human-system fit, and alert provenance.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

SphUnc: Hyperspherical Uncertainty Decomposition and Causal Identification via Information Geometry

Reliable decision-making in complex multi-agent systems requires calibrated predictions and interpretable uncertainty. We introduce SphUnc, a unified framework combining hyperspherical representation learning with structural causal modeling. The model maps features to unit hypersphere latents using von Mises-Fisher distributions, decomposing uncertainty into epistemic and aleatoric components through information-geometric fusion. A structural causal model on spherical latents enables directed influence identification and interventional reasoning via sample-based simulation. Empirical evaluations on social and affective benchmarks demonstrate improved accuracy, better calibration, and interpretable causal signals, establishing a geometric-causal foundation for uncertainty-aware reasoning in multi-agent settings with higher-order interactions.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

TempoNet: Slack-Quantized Transformer-Guided Reinforcement Scheduler for Adaptive Deadline-Centric Real-Time Dispatchs

Real-time schedulers must reason about tight deadlines under strict compute budgets. We present TempoNet, a reinforcement learning scheduler that pairs a permutation-invariant Transformer with a deep Q-approximation. An Urgency Tokenizer discretizes temporal slack into learnable embeddings, stabilizing value learning and capturing deadline proximity. A latency-aware sparse attention stack with blockwise top-k selection and locality-sensitive chunking enables global reasoning over unordered task sets with near-linear scaling and sub-millisecond inference. A multicore mapping layer converts contextualized Q-scores into processor assignments through masked-greedy selection or differentiable matching. Extensive evaluations on industrial mixed-criticality traces and large multiprocessor settings show consistent gains in deadline fulfillment over analytic schedulers and neural baselines, together with improved optimization stability. Diagnostics include sensitivity analyses for slack quantization, attention-driven policy interpretation, hardware-in-the-loop and kernel micro-benchmarks, and robustness under stress with simple runtime mitigations; we also report sample-efficiency benefits from behavioral-cloning pretraining and compatibility with an actor-critic variant without altering the inference pipeline. These results establish a practical framework for Transformer-based decision making in high-throughput real-time scheduling.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Living Inside the Black Box: Behavioral Probing and Adaptation in Mandatory Wearable Sensing

Wearable sensing systems in high-stakes institutional contexts translate behavioral data into consequential judgments, yet wearers have little access to how those judgments are made. We present a qualitative study of 24 individuals who experienced mandatory electronic monitoring in China's community corrections system. We show that participants built what we term sensor literacy under constraint, a practical form of risk-oriented knowledge developed through uncertainty, behavioral probing, and adaptation. We identify two orientations across rule domains. Where participants had mapped system behavior, they sometimes regained limited flexibility. Where uncertainty remained costly, they contracted movement and discretionary activity beyond formal rules. Some former wearers described residual habits of calculation after device removal. We discuss design implications for making institutional sensing intelligible to wearers, including sensor uncertainty, usable documentation, and evaluation after device wearing.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Between Knowledge and Care: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Generative AI for T2DM Self-Management from Patient and Physician Perspectives

Generative AI is increasingly used for everyday health guidance, yet its clinical appropriateness in chronic disease contexts remains poorly understood. This paper presents a two-part mixed-methods study on \revise{Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)}, examining how patients and physicians assess AI-generated health information. \revise{Study~1} analyzes 784 \revise{participant reported} patient queries to characterize seven informational need categories and \revise{develops a structured five dimensional physician rating rubric informed by patient query categories and clinician priorities} (\textit{Accuracy, Safety, Clarity, Integrity, Action Orientation}). \revise{Study~2} engages seven physicians scoring responses from four AI models and discussing evaluative reasoning through in-depth interviews. Models perform well on factual explanation and lifestyle guidance but consistently underperform on medication reasoning and emotional support. Two \revise{analytic concepts} emerge \revise{from the data}. The \textit{pre-visit primer} \revise{frames AI as preparation for clinical encounters rather than as a replacement for physicians}. The \textit{fluency illusion} \revise{describes how polished language may convey epistemic authority that the clinical content does not support}. Patients and physicians converged on three shared limitations (role boundaries, emotional inadequacy, personalization gaps) while diverging in evaluative emphasis, \revise{which informed} four design directions, task-aware orchestration, risk-aware fallback, dynamic personalization, and emotionally attuned interaction.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Reading the Same Data Differently: Interpretive Labor Across System Boundaries in Electronic Monitoring

Electronic monitoring (EM) systems are increasingly used in community corrections to enforce spatial, temporal, and behavioral rules through continuous sensing. While prior work has examined EM as a criminal justice tool or as a mechanism for compliance, less is known about how sensed data become meaningful in everyday practice. This poster examines EM as a dual-sided sensing system in which supervised individuals and authorities reason about the same data stream from different positions. Based on semi-structured interviews with 26 supervised individuals and 12 authorities in China's community corrections system, we show that supervised individuals infer system logic from outcomes with limited visibility into how data are interpreted, while authorities reconstruct behavior from ambiguous traces using contextual knowledge, professional experience, and institutional procedures. We call this structural divergence interpretive misalignment. It emerges from asymmetric access to data, context, and reasoning processes, and it shapes behavior through probing, strategic adaptation, over-compliance, disengagement, and contestation. We contribute a CSCW account of continuous sensing as distributed interpretive work and identify design opportunities for making data-to-decision processes more legible, contestable, and accountable across system sides.

cs.HC↗