arXiv subjects

Yi Zhao

Publications and source records attributed to Yi Zhao.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2026

Measuring Research Difficulty of Academic Papers: A Case Study in Natural Language Processing

With the rapid growth of the number of academic papers, systematically evaluating the difficulty of research and its relationship to academic impact offers important significance for research topic selection and resource allocation. However, current studies lack quantitative assessments of research difficulty and its correlation with academic impact. This paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation system for research difficulty, incorporating factors such as academic collaboration, content, and references. Taking the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) as a case study, we extract both internal and external features from academic papers, compute multiple research difficulty indicators. We assign their weights using the entropy weight method and perform a weighted sum to obtain the research difficulty score of academic papers. This paper uses the citation frequency of academic papers to measure academic impact. To validate our approach, NLP experts assessed the difficulty of a sample of papers, and correlation analyses confirmed the reliability of our measurement. Empirical results reveal that in NLP, factors such as the number of pages, reference count, and participation of high-level institutions are significantly associated with academic impact. Moreover, we identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between research difficulty and academic impact. It suggests that moderately difficult research tends to achieve greater academic impact.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2026

Is Higher Team Gender Diversity Correlated with Better Scientific Impact?

Collaborative research involving scholars of various genders constitutes a prominent theme in scientific research that has garnered substantial attention. While several studies have investigated the connection between gender-specific collaboration patterns and the scientific impact of paper, the specific gender diversity factors that contribute to enhanced scientific impact remain largely unexplored. In this study, we analyze the correlation between gender diversity and the scientific impact of papers using the examples of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Library and Information Science (LIS) domains. Our findings reveal three key observations: First, significant gender disparities exist in both NLP and LIS domains, with underrepresentation of female scholars. The gender disparity is more pronounced in the NLP domain compared to the LIS domain. Second, based on papers from the NLP and LIS domains, we find that papers with different gender compositions achieve varying numbers of citations, with mixed-gender collaborations gradually obtaining higher average citation counts compared to same-gender collaborations. Lastly, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the gender diversity of paper collaborations and the number of citations received by those papers. Based on the most impactful gender diversity calculations, the ideal gender ratio for NLP and LIS teams within a range where one gender constitutes 5% to 15% of the total number of authors. This paper contributes to the exploration of the most impactful gender diversity in collaborative research and offers insights to guide more effective scientific paper collaboration.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2026

LongWebBench: Evaluating Structural and Functional Webpage Generation in Long-Horizon Settings

Recent vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising progress in generating webpages from visual inputs, yet existing evaluations mainly focus on short, single-screen, and largely static webpages. We introduce LongWebBench, a benchmark for evaluating long-horizon webpage generation from both structural and functional perspectives. LongWebBench contains 490 real-world long webpages for structural fidelity evaluation and 507 goal-oriented interaction tasks over 129 webpages for functional evaluation. It employs two complementary protocols: a multi-dimensional VLM-based metric for assessing long-range structural coherence, and a DOM-augmented agent-based pipeline for end-to-end functional verification. We further examine the automatic evaluation protocols through human agreement analysis. Experiments with state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary VLMs under single-image and multi-image settings reveal that structural fidelity degrades as webpage length increases, while visually plausible generations often fail to support executable multi-step interactions. These results highlight the need to evaluate long webpage generation beyond visual similarity, with executable interaction as a core criterion. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/zheny2751-dotcom/LongWebBench.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Guiding World Models with Non-Curated Data

Leveraging offline data is a promising way to improve the sample efficiency of online reinforcement learning (RL). This paper expands the pool of usable data for offline-to-online RL by leveraging abundant non-curated data that is reward-free, of mixed quality, and collected across multiple embodiments. Although learning a world model appears promising for utilizing such data, we find that naive fine-tuning fails to accelerate RL training on many tasks. Through careful investigation, we attribute this failure to the distributional shift between offline and online data during fine-tuning. To address this issue and effectively use the offline data, we propose two techniques: \emph{i)} experience rehearsal and \emph{ii)} execution guidance. With these modifications, the non-curated offline data substantially improves RL's sample efficiency. Under limited sample budgets, our method achieves nearly twice the aggregate score of learning-from-scratch baselines across 72 visuomotor tasks spanning 6 embodiments. On challenging tasks such as locomotion and robotic manipulation, it outperforms prior methods that utilize offline data by a decent margin.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Geometry-Preserving Unsupervised Alignment for Heterogeneous Foundation Models

Foundation models have driven rapid progress in computer vision, yet the two dominant paradigms, vision-language foundation models (VLMs) and vision-only foundation models (VFMs), remain only partially compatible. VLMs offer language-grounded semantic alignment but are often visually coarse, while VFMs learn discriminative perceptual geometry but lack semantic grounding. We propose GPUA (Geometry-Preserving Unsupervised Alignment), a framework that integrates the complementary strengths of VFMs and VLMs. Inspired by cross-lingual alignment, GPUA treats VFM features as a visual language and learns an orthogonal mapping that translates the VFM space into the VLM semantic space, preserving geometry and narrowing the modality gap without labels or model parameter updates. GPUA is task-agnostic and requires only feature-level access to pretrained models. Experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate improved cross-model compatibility and strong gains in downstream zero-shot recognition and segmentation with negligible overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/Yuteam14/GPUA

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Hyperbolic and Evidence-Prioritized Experts for Large Vision-Language Models

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on multimodal tasks through scaled architectures and extensive training. Recent studies introduce Mixture of Experts (MoE) into LVLMs for improved computational efficiency. However, existing MoE approaches treat visual and linguistic modalities with symmetric architectures, overlooking the inherent asymmetry in how these two modalities are processed. This asymmetry causes two critical issues. First, text and vision form hierarchical rather than parallel relationships, as text queries typically describe partial aspects of complete visual scenes. Euclidean expert space struggles to encode such containment structures. Second, language experts in deeper layers progressively shift from evidence-based processing to parametric memory dependence, losing grounding in the provided visual and linguistic information. To address these issues, we propose AsyMoE, a novel architecture that explicitly models this asymmetry through three specialized expert groups. Intra-modality experts handle modality-specific processing. Hyperbolic inter-modality experts capture hierarchical cross-modal relationships through negative curvature geometry. Evidence-priority language experts suppress parametric memory activation and maintain contextual grounding throughout network depth. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AsyMoE achieves consistent improvements over baseline methods, with average gains of 1.5\% over MoE variants and up to 3.8\% on hallucination-sensitive tasks. AsyMoE activates 25.45\% fewer parameters compared to dense models.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

[CLS] is Not Enough: Multi-Label Recognition via Patch-Level Inference and Adaptive Aggregation

Vision-Language Models such as CLIP exhibit strong zero-shot recognition capability by aligning images with textual concepts, yet they often underperform on multi-label recognition where multiple objects co-exist. A key bottleneck is that the [CLS] token, as a single global visual representation, is insufficient to faithfully encode diverse targets with varying scales, contexts, and co-occurrence patterns. To address this limitation, we present a new multi-label image recognition framework, termed PIAA, which formulates prediction as Patch-level Inference followed by Adaptive Aggregation. Specifically, we first enhance patch-wise predictions from two complementary perspectives: (i) mitigating semantic entanglement in the visual encoder to obtain more discriminative patch representations, and (ii) learning an unsupervised visual classifier to narrow the vision-language modality gap. We then introduce an adaptive aggregation module that consolidates patch-level scores into the final multi-label prediction. Notably, the entire pipeline is fully training-free, requiring no gradient updates or parameter fine-tuning. Experiments show that our method achieves strong improvements with minimal extra computation, exceeding a 6% mAP gain on the challenging NUS-WIDE benchmark over representative baselines. Code is available at https://github.com/akang-wang/PIAA.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Constraints on Self-Interacting Fuzzy Dark Matter from the Stellar Kinematics of the Dwarf Galaxy Leo II

The one-parameter fuzzy dark matter (FDM) model has faced increasingly stringent constraints from both Lyman-$α$ forest observations and local measurements of dwarf galaxies. A natural extension to mitigate these limits is the inclusion of FDM self-interactions. In this study, we derive constraints in the two-dimensional parameter space $(m_a, f_a)$ using the dark matter density profile inferred from a Jeans analysis of the stellar kinematics in the dwarf galaxy Leo II, which has previously been employed to constrain non-interacting FDM. We find that, for a fixed particle mass $m_a$, attractive (repulsive) self-interaction leads to a more concentrated (more diffuse) FDM density profile relative to the non-interacting case, thereby improving (worsening) agreement with the Jeans analysis results. Our results indicate that, for either attractive or repulsive SI with strength $f_a^{-1}\lesssim 10^{-14}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$, the $95\%$ confidence-level lower limits on $m_a$ lies within the range $(1-10)\times10^{-22}\,\mathrm{eV}$, although the precise bounds depend to some extent on the statistical method employed. This analysis simultaneously constrains the two parameters $(m_a, f_a)$ without relying on assumptions about cosmological or galaxy evolution histories, and thus offers a complementary probe to existing constraints.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

Multilevel Regression Modeling of Covariance Matrix Outcomes

Covariance matrix outcomes arise naturally in neuroimaging experiments to study brain functional connectivity. It is also of interest to understand how brain network organization varies with subject-level covariates. Existing covariance regression methods operate in a single-level framework and do not accommodate the hierarchically nested data structure in which subjects are grouped into clusters, such as age cohorts in lifespan studies. A Multilevel Covariate-Assisted Principal Regression (MCAP) framework is introduced, which identifies, for each cluster, a linear projection such that a generalized linear mixed effects model can be formulated with the covariates. The cluster-specific projections are modeled on the unit sphere via a von Mises-Fisher distribution, enabling principled borrowing of information across clusters. Model parameters are estimated by maximizing a hierarchical likelihood. For inference, a two-stage bootstrap procedure is proposed. Asymptotic properties of the estimators are established. Simulation studies demonstrate that MCAP substantially outperforms single-level competitors in estimating regression coefficients. Applied to the Human Connectome Project Lifespan Study spanning ages from five to ninety, MCAP identifies a dominant spectral brain network capturing age and sex effects on functional connectivity, and reveals findings including the convergence of neural reorganization patterns in late adulthood and the coordinated lifespan modulation of cross-network regions linked to language and executive function.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Scenario-Guided LLM-based Mobile App GUI Testing

The assurance of mobile app GUI has become increasingly important, as the GUI serves as the primary medium of interaction between users and apps. Although numerous automated GUI testing approaches have been developed with diverse strategies, a substantial gap remains between these approaches and the underlying app business logic. Most existing approaches focus on general exploration rather than the completion of specific testing scenarios, often resulting in missed coverage of critical functionalities. Inspired by the manual testing process, which treats business logic, driven testing scenarios as the fundamental unit of testing, this paper introduces an approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) to comprehend the semantics expressed in app GUIs and their contextual relevance to given testing scenarios. Building upon this capability, we propose ScenGen, a novel scenario-guided LLM-based GUI testing framework that employs a multi-agent collaboration mechanism to simulate and automate the phases of manual testing. ScenGen integrates five agents. The Observer perceives the app GUI state by extracting and structuring GUI widgets and layouts, thereby interpreting the semantic information presented in the GUI. This information is then passed to the Decider, which makes scenario-driven decisions with the guidance of LLMs to identify target widgets and determine appropriate actions toward fulfilling specific testing goals. The Executor executes the decided operations on the app, while the Supervisor verifies whether the execution results align with the intended testing scenario completion, ensuring traceability and consistency in test generation and execution. Finally, the Recorder records the corresponding GUI operations into the context memory as a knowledge base for subsequent decision-making and concurrently monitors runtime bug occurrences.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Optimal Routing for Federated Learning over Dynamic Satellite Networks: Tractable or Not?

Federated learning (FL) is a key paradigm for distributed model learning across decentralized data sources. Communication in each FL round typically consists of two phases: (i) distributing the global model from a server to clients, and (ii) collecting updated local models from clients to the server for aggregation. This paper focuses on a type of FL where communication between a client and the server is relay-based over dynamic networks, making routing optimization essential. A typical scenario is in-orbit FL, where satellites act as clients and communicate with a server (which can be a satellite, ground station, or aerial platform) via multi-hop inter-satellite links. This paper presents a comprehensive tractability analysis of routing optimization for in-orbit FL under different settings. For global model distribution, these include the number of models, the objective function, and routing schemes (unicast versus multicast, and splittable versus unsplittable flow). For local model collection, the settings consider the number of models, client selection, and flow splittability. For each case, we rigorously prove whether the global optimum is obtainable in polynomial time or the problem is NP-hard. Together, our analysis draws clear boundaries between tractable and intractable regimes for a broad spectrum of routing problems for in-orbit FL. For tractable cases, the derived efficient algorithms are directly applicable in practice. For intractable cases, we provide fundamental insights into their inherent complexity. These contributions fill a critical yet unexplored research gap, laying a foundation for principled routing design, evaluation, and deployment in satellite-based FL or similar distributed learning systems.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI

With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), the academic community has faced unprecedented disruptions, particularly in the realm of academic communication. The primary function of peer review is improving the quality of academic manuscripts, such as clarity, originality and other evaluation aspects. Although prior studies suggest that LLMs are beginning to influence peer review, it remains unclear whether they are altering its core evaluative functions. Moreover, the extent to which LLMs affect the linguistic form, evaluative focus, and recommendation-related signals of peer-review reports has yet to be systematically examined. In this study, we examine the changes in peer review reports for academic articles following the emergence of LLMs, emphasizing variations at fine-grained level. Specifically, we investigate linguistic features such as the length and complexity of words and sentences in review comments, while also automatically annotating the evaluation aspects of individual review sentences. We also use a maximum likelihood estimation method, previously established, to identify review reports that potentially have modified or generated by LLMs. Finally, we assess the impact of evaluation aspects mentioned in LLM-assisted review reports on the informativeness of recommendation for paper decision-making. The results indicate that following the emergence of LLMs, peer review texts have become longer and more fluent, with increased emphasis on summaries and surface-level clarity, as well as more standardized linguistic patterns, particularly reviewers with lower confidence score. At the same time, attention to deeper evaluative dimensions, such as originality, replicability, and nuanced critical reasoning, has declined.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

TrigReason: Trigger-Based Collaboration between Small and Large Reasoning Models

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks through extended chains of thought but suffer from high inference latency due to autoregressive reasoning. Recent work explores using Small Reasoning Models (SRMs) to accelerate LRM inference. In this paper, we systematically characterize the capability boundaries of SRMs and identify three common types of reasoning risks: (1) path divergence, where SRMs lack the strategic ability to construct an initial plan, causing reasoning to deviate from the most probable path; (2) cognitive overload, where SRMs fail to solve particularly difficult steps; and (3) recovery inability, where SRMs lack robust self-reflection and error correction mechanisms. To address these challenges, we propose TrigReason, a trigger-based collaborative reasoning framework that replaces continuous polling with selective intervention. TrigReason delegates most reasoning to the SRM and activates LRM intervention only when necessary-during initial strategic planning (strategic priming trigger), upon detecting extraordinary overconfidence (cognitive offload trigger), or when reasoning falls into unproductive loops (intervention request trigger). The evaluation results on AIME24, AIME25, and GPQA-D indicate that TrigReason matches the accuracy of full LRMs and SpecReason, while offloading 1.70x - 4.79x more reasoning steps to SRMs. Under edge-cloud conditions, TrigReason reduces latency by 43.9\% and API cost by 73.3\%. Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/QQQ-yi/TrigReason}{https://github.com/QQQ-yi/TrigReason}

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Single-Dimension Novelty: How Combinations of Theory, Method, and Results-based Novelty Shape Scientific Impact

Scientific novelty drives advances at the research frontier, yet it is also associated with heightened uncertainty and potential resistance from incumbent paradigms, leading to complex patterns of scientific impact. Prior studies have primarily ex-amined the relationship between a single dimension of novelty -- such as theoreti-cal, methodological, or results-based novelty -- and scientific impact. However, because scientific novelty is inherently multidimensional, focusing on isolated dimensions may obscure how different types of novelty jointly shape impact. Consequently, we know little about how combinations of novelty types influence scientific impact. To this end, we draw on a dataset of 15,322 articles published in Nature Communications. Using the DeepSeek-V3 model, we classify articles into three novelty dimensions based on the content of their Introduction sections: theoretical novelty, methodological novelty, and results-based novelty. These dimensions may coexist within the same article, forming distinct novelty configura-tions. Scientific impact is measured using five-year citation counts and indicators of whether an article belongs to the top 1% or top 10% highly cited papers. Descriptive results indicate that results-based novelty alone and the simultaneous presence of all three novelty types are the dominant configurations in the sample. Regression results further show that articles with results-based novelty only re-ceive significantly more citations and are more likely to rank among the top 1% and top 10% highly cited papers than articles exhibiting all three novelty types. These findings advance our understanding of how multidimensional novelty configurations shape knowledge diffusion.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2026

NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment

Novelty is a core requirement in academic publishing and a central focus of peer review, yet the growing volume of submissions has placed increasing pressure on human reviewers. While large language models (LLMs), including those fine-tuned on peer review data, have shown promise in generating review comments, the absence of a dedicated benchmark has limited systematic evaluation of their ability to assess research novelty. To address this gap, we introduce NovBench, the first large-scale benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' capability to generate novelty evaluations in support of human peer review. NovBench comprises 1,684 paper-review pairs from a leading NLP conference, including novelty descriptions extracted from paper introductions and corresponding expert-written novelty evaluations. We focus on both sources because the introduction provides a standardized and explicit articulation of novelty claims, while expert-written novelty evaluations constitute one of the current gold standards of human judgment. Furthermore, we propose a four-dimensional evaluation framework (including Relevance, Correctness, Coverage, and Clarity) to assess the quality of LLM-generated novelty evaluations. Extensive experiments on both general and specialized LLMs under different prompting strategies reveal that current models exhibit limited understanding of scientific novelty, and that fine--tuned models often suffer from instruction-following deficiencies. These findings underscore the need for targeted fine-tuning strategies that jointly improve novelty comprehension and instruction adherence.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

GECAM discovery of a peculiar magnetar X-ray burst (MXB 221120) from SGR J1935+2154 associated with a fast radio burst

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are enigmatic cosmic transients of millisecond duration observed in the radio band. The identification of FRB-associated magnetar X-ray bursts (MXBs) from galactic magnetar SGR J1935+2154 suggests that at least a fraction of FRBs can be produced from magnetar activity. However, the sample size of FRB-associated MXBs is still very small. Here we report a bright and peculiar FRB-associated MXB from SGR J1935+2154 detected by GECAM on November 20, 2022, dubbed MXB 221120. We find that both temporal and spectral properties of MXB 221120 exhibit distinctive features. Its light curve could be generally described by a single FRED function with superposition of several narrow pulses. Interestingly, we identify a possible QPO feature with center frequency of ~18 Hz in this MXB. The time-integrated spectrum is best fitted by a blackbody model with temperature (kT ) of 18.6 keV, rendering it the first thermal spectrum FRB-associated MXB from SGR J1935+2154. Compared to other MXBs with single emission episode, MXB 221120 has longer duration and higher blackbody temperature, making it an outlier in the burst sample. These results indicate that MXB 221120 may be produced by a special mechanism with extreme physical conditions.

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2026

Exploring Novelty Differences between Industry and Academia: A Knowledge Entity-centric Perspective

Academia and industry each possess distinct advantages in advancing technological progress. Academia's core mission is to promote open dissemination of research results and drive disciplinary progress. The industry values knowledge appropriability and core competitiveness, yet actively engages in open practices like academic conferences and platform sharing, creating a knowledge strategy paradox. Highly novel and publicly accessible knowledge serves as the driving force behind technological advancement. However, it remains unclear whether industry or academia can produce more novel research outcomes. Some studies argue that academia tends to generate more novel ideas, while others suggest that industry researchers are more likely to drive breakthroughs. Previous studies have been limited by data sources and inconsistent measures of novelty. To address these gaps, this study conducts an analysis using four types of fine-grained knowledge entities (Method, Tool, Dataset, Metric), calculates semantic distances between entities within a unified semantic space to quantify novelty, and achieves comparability of novelty across different types of literature. Then, a regression model is constructed to analyze the differences in publication novelty between industry and academia. The results indicate that academia demonstrates higher novelty outputs, which is particularly evident in patents. At the entity level, both academia and industry emphasize method-driven advancements in papers, while industry holds a unique advantage in datasets. Additionally, academia-industry collaboration has a limited effect on enhancing the novelty of research papers, but it helps to enhance the novelty of patents. We release our data and associated codes at https://github.com/tinierZhao/entity_novelty.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2026

DiT-HC: Enabling Efficient Training of Visual Generation Model DiT on HPC-oriented CPU Cluster

Generative foundation models have become an important tool for data reconstruction and simulation in scientific computing, showing a tight integration with traditional numerical simulations. At the same time, with the development of new hardware features, such as matrix acceleration units and high-bandwidth memory, CPU-based clusters offer promising opportunities to accelerate and scale such models, facilitating the unification of artificial intelligence and scientific computing. We present DiT-HC, the first system to train and scale the generative model DiT on a next-generation HPC CPU cluster. DiT-HC introduces three key techniques: (1) communication-free tensor parallelism (CFTP) with AutoMem for automated memory-aware dataflow, (2) HCOps, a suite of optimized GEMM and operator kernels leveraging vector and matrix acceleration units, and (3) a custom MPI backend that overlaps computation, communication, and memory movement. Experiments show 8.2 to 87.7 times speedups over native or public CPU libraries and 90.6% weak scaling efficiency on 256 nodes. These results demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale generative model training on CPU clusters and provide new insights for future HPC-AI co-design.

cs.DC↗