arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Ye Yuan

Publications and source records attributed to Ye Yuan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Dual-Metric Partitioning with Adaptive Kernel Execution for Efficient GCN Acceleration

Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) are widely used for large graph-structured data, including social, citation, and e-commerce networks, but their deployment is constrained by irregular memory access and severe GPU workload imbalance. These challenges arise in two dimensions: width imbalance from power-law degree distributions and depth imbalance from heterogeneous neighborhood connectivity.We present DualGCN, a GPU acceleration framework addressing both dimensions through dual-metric graph partitioning and adaptive kernel execution. DualGCN combines node degree, reflecting aggregation width, with neighborhood density estimated by anonymous random walks, capturing multihop connectivity and access depth. This hybrid workload metric enables connectivity-aware partitioning of large graphs into sparse and dense regions while reducing workload imbalance from linear to logarithmic complexity. DualGCN then selects partition-specific execution strategies: sparse partitions use warp-level parallelism and coalesced memory access, whereas dense partitions exploit instruction-level parallelism to hide latency and improve GPU utilization. Experiments on twelve real-world graph datasets show that DualGCN consistently accelerates GCN computation, achieving average speedups of 2.53x, 3.8x, and 2.13x over cuSPARSE, GNNAdvisor, and ACCEL, respectively. These results demonstrate that jointly optimizing graph partitioning and kernel execution provides an effective solution for processing large-scale graph and socialnetwork workloads.

cs.DB

QUACK: Questioning, Understanding, and Auditing Communicated Knowledge in Multimodal Social Deduction Agents

Social deduction games have become a popular testbed for probing reasoning, deception, coordination, and belief modeling in Large Language Model (LLM) agents. However, most environments are scored only by game outcomes such as win rates and largely remain to text-only interaction, making it difficult to tell whether an agent's language is actually grounded in what it perceived and did, or to identify the failure modes underlying its behavior. To address this gap, we introduce QUACK, an open-source environment and evaluation framework for auditing the grounding of agent language in multimodal social reasoning. QUACK evaluates agents at three levels: game outcomes, behavioral trajectories, and utterance-level consistency. Its core Statement Verification Pipeline reconstructs each agent's ground-truth trajectory from engine logs and checks every discussion claim against it, automatically flagging spatial hallucination, unsupported accusation, deception collapse, and language-action inconsistency. Evaluating three frontier VLMs in both homogeneous and cross-model adversarial settings, we find that even the strongest agent hallucinates 15.1% of its verifiable spatial claims and 11.5% of accusations are strictly unsupported. We release the full engine, evaluation framework, toolkit, and logs in https://github.com/AAAAA-Academia-Attractions/QUACK.

cs.CL

CARE: Privacy-Compliant Agentic Reasoning with Evidence Discordance

Large language model (LLM) systems are increasingly used to support high-stakes decision-making, but they typically perform worse when the available evidence is internally inconsistent. Such a scenario exists in real-world healthcare settings, with patient-reported symptoms contradicting medical signs. To study this problem, we introduce MIMIC-DOS, a dataset for short-horizon organ dysfunction worsening prediction in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We derive this dataset from the widely recognized MIMIC-IV, a publicly available electronic health record dataset, and construct it exclusively from cases in which discordance between signs and symptoms exists. This setting poses a substantial challenge for existing LLM-based approaches, with single-pass LLMs and agentic pipelines often struggling to reconcile such conflicting signals. To address this problem, we propose CARE: a multi-stage privacy-compliant agentic reasoning framework in which a proprietary LLM provides guidance by generating structured categories and transitions without accessing sensitive patient data, while a local LLM uses these categories and transitions to support evidence acquisition and final decision-making. Empirically, under controlled retrospective evaluation on MIMIC-DOS, CARE achieves the best overall performance across key metrics among the evaluated LLMs and agentic workflows, showing that it can more robustly handle conflicting clinical evidence while preserving privacy.

cs.CL